serious?????????????? after 20 years you think i dont know that ? are you my holy spiritKnow that you are accountable to the Lord for what you preached, James 3:1.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
serious?????????????? after 20 years you think i dont know that ? are you my holy spiritKnow that you are accountable to the Lord for what you preached, James 3:1.
I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with this stuff which is pretty basic and found in several commentaries. It does not alter the fact that 1 John 1:8-10 is in the Bible. Note that John uses the 1st Person Plural, 'We.' John is including himself with his readers. If John and his readers say that they have no sin, they are deceiving themselves. Therefore they confess their sins and are forgiven. If they were to suggest that they had not sinned, they would be making God out to be a liar. Was John a liar? If he wasn't he had sins that he needed to confess.So you believe it is 1 John 3:9 that must change. Interesting. But there is a simpler answer than corrupting the clear meaning, but you have to know who is writing this, and in this case it is a Jew - John. When you understand Semitic writing styles in advanced studies, you immediately recognize that 1 John 1 has a list of contrasts. Has anyone asked themselves why 1 John 1:8 and 1 John 1:10 are not together? Wouldn't they both need to have 1 John 1:9 as the answer? A Greek would have combined them. But, again, John's a Hebrew. The solution is in the third odd ball, 1 John 1:6 - darkness, which would also need verse 9 as the answer to the darkness. Now we can recognize that 6, 8 and 10 are all darkness contrasting with the light verses. Does a Christian continually walk in darkness? Of course not, they are lying to themselves and need to repent, and just as in 8 and 10 there is no truth in them. In other words, they do not belong to Christ (Romans 8:9).
1 John 1:5-10 is a list of contrasts. Light vs. Darkness. John does the same thing in chapter 3, those of Jesus vs. those of the devil. Though the man-made verse numbering didn't recognize the style and made it harder to see; but chapter one is very clear, as each verse is either of light or of darkness.
5 6 7 8 9 10
5 This is the message which we have heard from Him and declare to you, that God is light and in Him is no darkness at all. 6 If we say that we have fellowship with Him, and walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth. 7 But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us.
appreciate all replies ..i preached on righteousness this morning what was given to me.. know some of you can hash out of we can sin or not after being saved . i have no more need chase wild rabbits
I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with this stuff which is pretty basic and found in several commentaries. It does not alter the fact that 1 John 1:8-10 is in the Bible. Note that John uses the 1st Person Plural, 'We.' John is including himself with his readers. If John and his readers say that they have no sin, they are deceiving themselves. Therefore they confess their sins and are forgiven. If they were to suggest that they had not sinned, they would be making God out to be a liar. Was John a liar? If he wasn't he had sins that he needed to confess.
The fact that the Present Tense in Greek denotes continuity is also pretty basic and is found in any Greek grammar, and in every commentary on 1 John that I possess. To continue in a sin is to be walking in darkness, so we need to be confessing our sins and to be putting them to death (Colossians 3:5). However, we will never be rid of them (cf. Romans 7:22-23; Galatians 5:17), which is why we need to be constantly confessing them, and if you are not confessing your sins because you think you don't have any, well........just read 1 John 1:8-10 again, particularly noting the portions that you have underlined.
This is just wrong. The whole passage is written in the Present Tense. He's not saying, "If we used to say that we had no sin we would have been deceiving ourselves and the truth would not have been in us," which is what you're trying to make him say, but the grammar of the text won't let you do it.Yes, WE must all test ourselves to see if we are of God. It is a teaching. Of course 1 John 1:8-10 is in the Bible, but so is 1 John 1:6 the key to unlocking the truth that 8 and 10 are before conversion.
Why do we try to make things more complicated than they are?good post hope to see more construtive replies
How can this person ever be wrong? She is well above everyone else. And believes that the apostle John was seriously in error.This is just wrong.
Why do we try to make things more complicated than they are?
God first declares us righteous (imputed righteousness), and then works out His righteousness in us by the power of the Holy Spirit. That is called walking in the Spirit.
This does not mean that anyone will be sinlessly perfect (as some deluded, self-deceived individuals claim). It does mean that sin must not and cannot have dominion over righteousness for those who are genuinely saved.
This is just wrong. The whole passage is written in the Present Tense. He's not saying, "If we used to say that we had no sin we would have been deceiving ourselves and the truth would not have been in us," which is what you're trying to make him say, but the grammar of the text won't let you do it.
Your own righteousness is filthy rags before God (Isaiah 64:6), quite unable to cover up your sin. You cannot stand before God dressed in that.
'......That I may gain Christ, and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith............Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected, but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me..........' (Philippians 3:8-12).
'I will greatly rejoice in the LORD,
My soul shall be joyful in my God;
For He has clothed me with the garments of salvation,
He has covered me with the robe of righteousness.....' (Isaiah 61:10).
The very first couple, when they fell into sin, needed a covering for that sin. The covering that they made themselves was totally unsuitable; God could see right through it to the sin beneath (Genesis 3:7ff). It was God Himself who supplied a covering for the guilty couple, and for that, and innocent creature had to die (Genesis 3:21), prefiguring the suffering and death of the Lord Jesus Christ to provide us with a suitable covering.
i have asked this question many times..some think they have to be rightWhy do we try to make things more complicated than they are?
so we can never sin ?Nonsense. How can WE be the righteousness of God in Him if we sin? In Him is no sin.
lol i done forgot your postYou are welcome. I was curious to know what you thought of my post : ) I hope it didn't come off like another wild rabbit chase.
Hope your message went well, and blessings in Christ.
Hidden
lol i done forgot your post
i would like to have sort through all the wild junk firstLoL! Well, it's probably still there if you ever decide to do some backtracking <chuckle> : )
It was God Himself who supplied a covering for the guilty couple, and for that, and innocent creature had to die (Genesis 3:21), prefiguring the suffering and death of the Lord Jesus Christ to provide us with a suitable covering.
Apples and oranges discuss steak....the meat of the matter will evade them. Credit to you that you have the patience. Sad for Christians that they think a God was nailed to a piece of wood, and the best He could do was produce such shaky and unsure salvation. Good to know the truth, pray for those that do not. Good that we have confidence in Christ's saving grace.Believe what you like. It is your life.
But, for you to say "covering" instead of "take away" is a sure sign you believe the false teaching, even morphing God's clothing for a covering for Adam and Eve to be sufficient to cover their sin. Wrong. That is comparable only to the blood of bulls and goats if it applies at all. And just as with the OT sacrifices, their sin was still there. And that is what you believe also with the blood of Jesus! That the sins are only covered, not taken away! What a heresy.
Hebrews 10:4 "4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins.
1 John 3:5 "5 And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin.
1 John 3:9 "Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God." Of course, that is the verse you tried to change.
You mentioned commentaries, but not what they say? Need to know whose commentary you are reading instead of the Word of God.
Just say, "Thanks, Captain Obvious..."serious?????????????? after 20 years you think i dont know that ? are you my holy spirit
Was John a liar? If he wasn't he had sins that he needed to confess.
This does not mean that anyone will be sinlessly perfect (as some deluded, self-deceived individuals claim).
so we can never sin ?