The parable is not addressed to just one individual steward.
The parable is clearly talking about one servant even though it has application for all.
V.42 says faithful and wise manager - singular - not managers.
V.43 says "that servant" will be rewarded, not those servants.
V.45 says "the servant" will be punished, not those servants.
Jesus was addressing the public and, after Peter's question, He switched to the singular.
Again, you are using the word 'condemned' here but that is not said in this parable. I am not sure that being cut in sunder means being cut in half. It may well indicate being severed from his position. We use such terminology today don't we? Severance pay? And, if he was cut in half, then how or why would he be beaten with many stripes? (12:47)
You are being highly imaginative and haven't considered what it means to be assigned a place with the unbelievers. Can you come up with just one, only one, commentary which even hints at your interpretation? I have about 30 and none do.
Peter's question was in response to the parable. The parable was not the result of Peter's question.
Peter's question was in v.41, the parable came next and switches to the singular.
[/quote]That this parable speaks to the Second Coming of Christ[/quote]
I believe the PreTrib Rapture is a false doctrine.
God bless,
Mick