Arnie Manitoba
Well-Known Member
Axe .... my whole point is that these arguments are a waste of time
Any real investigator uses facts , not rhetoric
Any real investigator uses facts , not rhetoric
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Actually, I don't see anyone arguing. I see a bunch of people considering the "angles", considering the info being disseminated and discussing the credibility or in-credibility of the "facts" as we are being told they are. Most if not all the facts seem to be lacking reasoned credibility and so we are discussing what these points are and why. Then, I see a person calling everyone "suckers" as if that person knows the real truth.IAmAWitness said:^^^ Likes to start arguments to waste everyone else's time, as long as he's having a good time. He doesn't care about others feelings. ^^^
^^^ He came to start an argument here and then to appear more righteous than you says, "Arguments are a big waste of time." ^^^
I do not believe most of the mainstream mediaIAmAWitness said:Calling them suckers, and then trying to start a whole debate about why the conspiracy theorists will not listen to reason and are paranoid for rejecting the mainstream media since according to him they would not lie to us for anything.
"Inaccuracies of the media?" Excuse me? The media is reporting everything as fact. The inaccuracies you are talking about are just a smoke screen. Address James' 80 points!Arnie Manitoba said:Because of the inaccuracies by the media ..... the ground is then fertile for the alternative explanations from the conspiracy theorists .... such as ..... nobody got fingerprints from the van load of nuns with the blown out back window and somebody saw an owl which means the Illuminati are behind the whole thing.
Very good, James.James Forthwright said:Why should someone who reportedly resides in Canuckistan be so enthralled with the political machinations of their southern neighbor? As far as I know, militant armed US citizens have no plans to invade The Great White North. Your tuuk seems screwed on a bit too tight, Arnie.
For your information, IMO, there's not a hairsbreadth difference between the two major US political parties.
Arnie, every chance you get you deflect from the conversation. Are you fighting so hard because you don't want people to think that you are really what you are calling others? You look extremely foolish in light of Jame's 100 points.Arnie Manitoba said:I do not believe most of the mainstream media
Nor do I believe the conspiracy theories presented by alternative media
Neither group tells the truth , that is my point
Anyone who believes them wholeheartedly are being sucked into believing something that is not true
For that reason I feel free to call them suckers.
Nobody likes to be called a sucker .... it is a personal embarrassment that can cut deep
But it has the beneficial effect that people start to be careful "not to be suckered"
That folks , was my whole intent... dont be suckered by the nonsense out there
There are still a lot of people who think OJ Simpson was innocent
There are still a lot of people who think detective mark Fuhrman set up OJ in a conspiracy
There are still a lot of people who think Rodney King was the subject of racism
There are still a lot of people who think the JFK assassination was a conspiracy
There are still a lot of people who think 911 was an inside conspiracy
Pick any topic you want ..... including Sandy Hook ..... the media presents one version .... often incorrect because at first NOBODY KNOWS FOR SURE WHAT WAS HAPPENING at the time.
Even when the mainstream media has access to all the facts ..... they still screw up their reports ... most journalist are clueless ..... not all of them , but the 23 year old reporter knows more about her fingernails and hair than the news she is reporting on live camera at Sandy Hook .
Because of the inaccuracies by the media ..... the ground is then fertile for the alternative explanations from the conspiracy theorists .... such as ..... nobody got fingerprints from the van load of nuns with the blown out back window and somebody saw an owl which means the Illuminati are behind the whole thing.
The girl pictured with the president was the dead girls sisterPeltast said:I have only just become aware of controversy surrounding the Sandy Hook shooting.
Things I have picked up on include: illogical statements from witnesses, at least one photoshopped photo, the killer may have died the previous day, and one victim may have met the president two days post-mortem.
So I'm baffled. What really happened? Was there a shooting? Was anyone really killed?
What should trouble Christians here about you Arnie is that it is a standard premise of most of your posts that you are entitled to say who is a Christian and who is not. But that is not the case Arnie and it is disgusting that you still cannot understand this. You need to move on and understand that you have no power to judge anyone else and we're all equal in that regard.Arnie Manitoba said:Hey guys .... in my post # 70 ..... I added items #105 to #111 as you can see
i just made it up and typed it out .... took me about 6 minutes ..... dont believe a word of it ..... it is nonsense.
As far as the other Sandy Hook nonsense .... I wish you wouldn't believe it either
That stuff is for dummies who cannot think for themselves
It troubles me when purported Christians fall for that stuff ... and that is my motive here.
You are confusedIAmAWitness said:What should trouble Christians here about you Arnie is that it is a standard premise of most of your posts that you are entitled to say who is a Christian and who is not. But that is not the case Arnie and it is disgusting that you still cannot understand this. You need to move on and understand that you have no power to judge anyone else and we're all equal in that regard.
I wonder what Arnie thinks about "Fast and Furious". He probably thought Christians were stupid suckers when they smelled something that stunk (conspiracy). And now we know that Eric Holder (Attorney General) was being a very bad boy and these firearms were NOT stolen from Arizona or New Mexico Gun Stores.IAmAWitness said:What should trouble Christians here about you Arnie is that it is a standard premise of most of your posts that you are entitled to say who is a Christian and who is not. But that is not the case Arnie and it is disgusting that you still cannot understand this. You need to move on and understand that you have no power to judge anyone else and we're all equal in that regard.
Not everything our governments do makes sense to the peasantsAxehead said:I wonder what Arnie thinks about "Fast and Furious". He probably thought Christians were stupid suckers when they smelled something that stunk (conspiracy). And now we know that Eric Holder (Attorney General) was being a very bad boy and these firearms were NOT stolen from Arizona or New Mexico Gun Stores.
But Arnie doesn't think evil people plot secretly to do bad things. He is the living definition of his very own ad hominems.
You reveal more each time in your posts. We are "peasants". Are you a peasant, too? You still sidestep questions. What did you think of "Fast and Furious" gun running and the government's coverup of it?Arnie Manitoba said:Not everything our governments do makes sense to the peasants
Let me give you an example of a "smart" thing the USA did in the middle east
Saddam Hussein had billions of dollars from selling Iraqi oil to the USA
To get some of that money back the USA sold him all his military equipment
A lot of it was becoming outdated anyway .... the USA uses the money to build newer equipment for themselves
Plus it armed Iraq against a takeover by Iran back then
Better to have Iran & Iraq fight each other than fighting us
By selling Iraq military equipment meant squat because the USA took over Iraq very easily with stealth fighter and smart bombs
Whereas all Iraq had was some outdated surplus US equipment
And the USA had all the oil money back and now controls Iraq for all practical purposes
Point is ..... we must acknowledge it was a "smart move" to sell Saddam the equipment back in the 1980's
But the peasant does not think on such a level
They prefer the conspiracy theories that require the IQ of a rock to beleive
Don't lie about it now. You have spread these attacks throughout this forum far and wide. Attacks against Jehovah's Witnesses, Unitarians, attacks against me and meshak, and trying to say these people are not saved.Arnie Manitoba said:You are confused
I have never gone around deciding who is christian or not
An example of a peasant in the way i used the term would be like the folks who still think OJ is innocentAxehead said:You reveal more each time in your posts. We are "peasants". Are you a peasant, too? You still sidestep questions. What did you think of "Fast and Furious" gun running and the government's coverup of it?
How did America get repaid for the expenditures of the Iraq war? We did not get any oil. Seems like we were real dumb. How about all the money we are printing and jacking up debt? How smart is that?
Two wars, two trillion dollars and what was accomplished?