bbyrd009
Groper
- Nov 30, 2016
- 33,943
- 12,082
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States Minor Outlying Islands
so prophecy whores would get their panties all in a bunch, would be my guessRestricted the flow why?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
so prophecy whores would get their panties all in a bunch, would be my guessRestricted the flow why?
You can snip anything.
i don't really get that, because that area was known as "Mideast" even then, and "East" is generally acknowledged to be Oriental i thinkYou don't know prophecy, the Kings of the East fight for the Beast and they fight against Jesus Christ.
The verse was never the point.i beg your pardon? I don't think every single thing you are posting is complete nonsense, ok, you've posted some good stuff too
yes, i'm fam with it. unfortunately that is a contested verse, and i haven't spent any time digging into the original to discover whether "I AM," "I Am" and "I am" would even be written the same way. I notice in this example all three are used by diff translations
then they are doomed, and i have nothing to worry about, right?the Kings of the East fight for the Beast and they fight against Jesus Christ.
fwiw you are hardly the first person to bring this upanyone that knows Bible prophecy would instantly recognize these prophecies.
well, i see you're in the right section--one i try really hard to stay out of--so i gotta say i am surprised, i would think the guys in here would love to have a mass debate with you :)I should not even care how people respond.
I thought I would get preteris. historist, post trib, mid trib, pretty trib, futurist, etc, arguments against.
But it's been nonsense.
I just don't want to get into trouble if it does happen and I didn't say anything.
in the contested verse? Do you think that is the only way to "understand I AM?"The point was the one Jesus Christ made.
What was Jesus Christ saying to them?in the contested verse? Do you think that is the only way to "understand I AM?"
assuming it is even valid; strikes me as some Trinitarian scribitude personally, but i don't know.
Then we are all saved.then they are doomed, and i have nothing to worry about, right?
It's only another month.fwiw you are hardly the first person to bring this up
I always just took it to mean they lowered the Euphrates River and crossed from east to west.i don't really get that, because that area was known as "Mideast" even then, and "East" is generally acknowledged to be Oriental i think
that's a diff "I am" than @ "I AM WHO I AM," and for whatever reason i cannot for the life of me find "Understand I AM" at the moment, but i bet it agrees with "I AM WHO I AM"Wow. Everyone just makes up complete nonsense and posts it.
Read something.
John 8:58 "Very truly I tell you," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!"
what does that have to do with them being Oriental and not IS?I always just took it to mean they lowered the Euphrates River and crossed from east to west.
a diff "I am," as i said, assuming the verse is even validWhat was Jesus Christ saying to them?
You're not even 50 and you knew our Father Abraham?
Truly I say to you, even before Abraham was I Am.
The word was God, all things were made by him.
Now Father glorify me with the glory that I had with you before the world was made.
That's the point.
thank God then maybe we will get a break here lol.It's only another month.
Thank you 'bbyrd' that is super useful. Had tried to find beginnings of threads and had a hard time doing so.no--if you click just to the right of the name at the top of a quote, it will take you back to it, and so on
I don't understand.what does that have to do with them being Oriental and not IS?