Years ago I used to ask myself if Jesus came to show us a way of life, or to set up a church.Catholics agree with Protestants that Scripture is a "standard of truth" — even the preeminent one — but not in a sense that rules out the binding authority of authentic apostolic Tradition and the Church. The Bible doesn't teach that. Catholics agree that Scripture is materially sufficient. In other words, on this view, every true doctrine can be found in the Bible, if only implicitly and indirectly by deduction. But no biblical passage teaches that Scripture is the formal authority or rule of faith in isolation from the Church and Tradition. Sola scriptura can't even be deduced from implicit passages.
Ephesians 4 Refutes the Protestant "Proof Text"
"All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work" (2 Tim. 3:16-17).
This passage doesn't teach formal sufficiency, which excludes a binding, authoritative role for Tradition and the Church. Protestants extrapolate onto the text what isn't there. If we look at the overall context of this passage, we can see that Paul makes reference to oral Tradition three times (cf. 2 Tim. 1:13-14, 2:2, 3:14). And to use an analogy, let's examine a similar passage:
"And his gifts were that some should be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the cunning of men, by their craftiness in deceitful wiles. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ" (Eph. 4:11-15).
If 2 Timothy 3 proves the sole sufficiency of Scripture, then, by analogy, Ephesians 4 would likewise prove the sufficiency of pastors and teachers for the attainment of Christian perfection. In Ephesians 4, the Christian believer is equipped, built up, brought into unity and mature manhood, and even preserved from doctrinal confusion by means of the teaching function of the Church. This is a far stronger statement of the perfecting of the saints than 2 Timothy 3, yet it does not even mention Scripture.
So if all non-scriptural elements are excluded in 2 Timothy, then, by analogy, Scripture would logically have to be excluded in Ephesians. It is far more reasonable to recognize that the absence of one or more elements in one passage does not mean that they are nonexistent. The Church and Scripture are both equally necessary and important for teaching.
My conclusion is that without a church, Christianity could not exist.
It's truly a miracle that the Jewish people and country has been able to exist. I imagine any other people, American Indians, Italians, Indians --- take them out of their land and culture for 3 or 4 generations and the original population will be completely changed and forgotten.
Second, one has to accept that a church is necessary to pass on the teachings of Jesus. He commanded that the Apostles go and teach all nations --- how does one do that without an organized group?
One has to belong to the Church, but one also needs a church.
It seems to me that man is incapable even of doing God's work.
The CC became tainted by man.
The Protestant church has become tainted by man.
Some circles do ask themselves if perhaps Jesus' plan has failed.
Even the Holy Spirit cannot remove enough of the sin nature in us to do what we're supposed to do...keep the church holy.
I know that the CC teaches that although man is sinful, the church itself remains holy. As if the church were a "being" and entity unto itself.
I don't understand this very well.
I do see that except for the shism in 1,000 the CC has managed to remain united whereas the Protestant church cannot do this.
So, I don't know, is the Holy Spirit working in the Protestant church?
I do ask myself every now and then.
(I used to be Catholic and am now Protestant by doctrine)
P.S. We need both a church AND to learn Jesus' way of life.