Retrobyter
Active Member
Shabbat shalom, ATP.
I promise you that I will do the research with an open mind; however, there is aBIG HUGE DIFFERENCE between some thought or idea being “biblical” and that thought or idea having “Scriptural authentication.”
For instance, I can show you “biblical” proof that "one must be born again AND be baptized to be ‘saved.'” HOWEVER, the "Scriptural authentication" of one’s justification by God is to be found ONLY in the trading of places that is performed for us when God exchanges our sin for His righteousness. (2 Corinthians 5.) There is absolutely NOTHING that can rest upon whether we do or don’t do something to merit the grace of God. (I believe that you know this; therefore, I can use it for an example.)
Thus, one cannot add “submitting to baptism” as a prerequisite for God’s justification of an individual. It must be ALL OF GOD or it is not "OF GOD" at all! Even the “work” of being baptized is still a “WORK” - a GOOD DEED one must perform to get on God’s “good side!” Actually, baptism is simply an INDICATOR that shows one has been justified by God. In our country (the USA), that is not such a trustworthy indicator, because it bears little or no consequence. HOWEVER, in Islamic countries, baptism is a SERIOUS INDICATOR because it could get a person KILLED! In Jewish cultures, it could get a person DISOWNED and SHUNNED!
Therefore, Jonathan Cahn (which is a very good Jewish name indicating that he has priestly and Levitical heritage), had better show that his theory comes from verses that can be shown to apply to ANY nation, or they will not have Scriptural authentication. (Just letting you know how the research will be focused.)
Actually, the Bible speaks of neither a "7-year tribulation period" nor a "3.5-year great tribulation period.” Again, that is the RHETORIC that proponents of these positions have used, and that rhetoric is strictly the position-speak of their theology (specifically, their eschatological viewpoint). I personally believe that it is a "2000-year (so far) tribulation period” with a “balloon payment” at the end!ATP said:I believe in a PRE-WRATH rapture, because scripture does not speak of a seven year tribulation, it only speaks of a 3.5 year GREAT tribulation.
Incorrect brother. Those passages refer to the "Coming of the Son of Man". That term is only in connection to the first resurrection, rapture and God's wrath poured out. These three things do not represent the second coming. The second coming only refers to Jesus returning to defeat the Antichrist, destroy evil, and establish His millennial kingdom. The second coming is described in Rev 19:11-16.
Well, it seems to me you are not aware, or you wouldn't of taken Matthew 24:30; 25:31-33; and Luke 21:27 out of context.
Matt 24:40-41 has rapture written all over it. If you extend beyond these two verses, which you are supposed to do when studying scripture you will see the term "the coming of the Son of Man" and "the thief". These two terms refer specifically to the first resurrection and rapture.
Matt 24:36-44 NIV “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. 37As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 40Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. 41Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left. 42“Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. 43But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into. 44So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.
Wow. Where do I even start. Actually it is very biblical, Isa 9:10 was literally manifested physically using a Gazit Stone, a Sycamore, an Erez Tree and The Utterance in New York City. The proof is in the DVD'S, everything you need to know is there. But based upon your ignorance and lack of caring I highly doubt you will buy it. You can probably watch it for free on youtube, but I doubt you will do that too. You see, in order to learn about something you would have to take the time to read the book or watch the DVD'S. Are you willing to do this?....
Book - The Harbinger: by Jonathan Cahn
DVD - The Harbinger Decoded starring Jonathan Cahn
DVD - The Isa 9:10 Judgment: starring Jonathan Cahn
Wake up Retrobyter, and open your eyes. The time is now! America in these videos was casting judgment on themselves! LOL The Utterance of two or three witnesses can be found here...
Tom Daschle - youtube / watch?v=ukYiWd3T9sk
John Edwards - youtube / watch?v=Ts1IOn57a6s
Obama - youtube / watch?v=5HBJ9v5KxPo
Deut 19:15 NIV One witness is not enough to convict anyone accused of any crime or offense they may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.
2 Cor 13:1 NIV This will be my third visit to you. "Every matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."
- ATP
I promise you that I will do the research with an open mind; however, there is a
For instance, I can show you “biblical” proof that "one must be born again AND be baptized to be ‘saved.'” HOWEVER, the "Scriptural authentication" of one’s justification by God is to be found ONLY in the trading of places that is performed for us when God exchanges our sin for His righteousness. (2 Corinthians 5.) There is absolutely NOTHING that can rest upon whether we do or don’t do something to merit the grace of God. (I believe that you know this; therefore, I can use it for an example.)
Thus, one cannot add “submitting to baptism” as a prerequisite for God’s justification of an individual. It must be ALL OF GOD or it is not "OF GOD" at all! Even the “work” of being baptized is still a “WORK” - a GOOD DEED one must perform to get on God’s “good side!” Actually, baptism is simply an INDICATOR that shows one has been justified by God. In our country (the USA), that is not such a trustworthy indicator, because it bears little or no consequence. HOWEVER, in Islamic countries, baptism is a SERIOUS INDICATOR because it could get a person KILLED! In Jewish cultures, it could get a person DISOWNED and SHUNNED!
Therefore, Jonathan Cahn (which is a very good Jewish name indicating that he has priestly and Levitical heritage), had better show that his theory comes from verses that can be shown to apply to ANY nation, or they will not have Scriptural authentication. (Just letting you know how the research will be focused.)