And that's the verse that signals it. Not all of Israel is actually Israel according to God.
And not all are of Christ who are called Christian.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And that's the verse that signals it. Not all of Israel is actually Israel according to God.
As far as I know, 144,000 souls are the original Israel. And?not all who are born Israel are of Israel though right
love your avatar btw :)
And that's the verse that signals it. Not all of Israel is actually Israel according to God.
not all who are born Israel are of Israel though right
love your avatar btw :)
ha well i do at least, yesThat say they are Jews and are not ...has many perspectives to consider. One being in do we say we are ...yet deny His name in deeds?
Not sure what you mean? Do you mean not taking the mark of the beast and worshipping man instead of God? Can you clarify? One thing that has stood out is Joseph and how his brothers came to bow before him. They forgot it wasn’t Joseph who stored up for the famine and prepared the store but instead God. They meant evil against their brother but God meant it for good, to save many alive. Wasn’t until recently it also maybe became clear they didn’t (the tribes) go unpunished but went into bondage as they had sold their brother into. Genesis 50:19 And Joseph said unto them, Fear not: for am I in the place of God?ha well i do at least, yes
One being in do we say we are ...yet deny His name in deeds?
for clarificationha well i do at least, yes
i mean taking the mark, and worshipping man, "serving my country" we call it now i guess, yes, i did those things, and i find myself pretty much exclusively plowing my own ground today too!Do you mean not taking the mark of the beast and worshipping man instead of God? Can you clarify
this and the previous one are um much better understood as commentaries on our male and female sides, and our "sons" and "daughters," spiritually speaking. imo.Genesis 30:1-2 And when Rachel saw that she bare Jacob no children, Rachel envied her sister; and said unto Jacob, Give me children, or else I die. [2] And Jacob's anger was kindled against Rachel: and he said, Am I in God's stead, who hath withheld from thee the fruit of the womb?
ok, the Job passage is a whole diff can of worms, and i am not overjoyed at that tranny, "according to thy wish in God's stead" is um not what the original was saying imo, at least in todays english. That was Elihu talking there? ya...and we would first have to spend like the rest of the day understanding Elihu's ("God is Yahu" <a personal fave> or perhaps "He is my God") role in the matter of Job, the man "Righteous in his own eyes," which would require us to first understand that Job was in sin and reaped ezackly what he sowed, which which Prot is going to sit still for that lol right.Job 33:6 Behold, I am according to thy wish in God's stead: I also am formed out of the clay.
Worshipping clay or God? Maybe you meant nothing there in “denial” but if so can you share the perspective?
ok, the Job passage is a whole diff can of worms, and i am not overjoyed at that tranny, "according to thy wish in God's stead" is um not what the original was saying imo, at least in todays english. That was Elihu talking there? ya...and we would first have to spend like the rest of the day understanding Elihu's ("God is Yahu" <a personal fave> or perhaps "He is my God") role in the matter of Job, the man "Righteous in his own eyes," which would require us to first understand that Job was in sin and reaped ezackly what he sowed, which which Prot is going to sit still for that lol right.Job 33:6 Behold, I am according to thy wish in God's stead: I also am formed out of the clay.
Worshipping clay or God? Maybe you meant nothing there in “denial” but if so can you share the perspective?
Not sure what you mean? Do you mean not taking the mark of the beast and worshipping man instead of God? Can you clarify? One thing that has stood out is Joseph and how his brothers came to bow before him. They forgot it wasn’t Joseph who stored up for the famine and prepared the store but instead God. They meant evil against their brother but God meant it for good, to save many alive. Wasn’t until recently it also maybe became clear they didn’t (the tribes) go unpunished but went into bondage as they had sold their brother into. Genesis 50:19 And Joseph said unto them, Fear not: for am I in the place of God?
Two other times the similar is said:
Genesis 30:1-2 And when Rachel saw that she bare Jacob no children, Rachel envied her sister; and said unto Jacob, Give me children, or else I die. [2] And Jacob's anger was kindled against Rachel: and he said, Am I in God's stead, who hath withheld from thee the fruit of the womb?
which i hope i did not give the impression that i get Job ok, bc i sure do not. What i have discovered is that despite what is widely believed it likely predates the rest of our Bible, it is the first "poetic" Book, and Job repented of something, twice, that God seemed to immediately contradict. I get some very tiny pieces, maybeJob 33:6 Behold, I am according to thy wish in God's stead: I also am formed out of the clay.
Worshipping clay or God? Maybe you meant nothing there in “denial” but if so can you share the perspective?
ok, the Job passage is a whole diff can of worms, and i am not overjoyed at that tranny, "according to thy wish in God's stead" is um not what the original was saying imo, at least in todays english. That was Elihu talking there? ya...and we would first have to spend like the rest of the day understanding Elihu's ("God is Yahu" <a personal fave> or perhaps "He is my God") role in the matter of Job, the man "Righteous in his own eyes," which would require us to first understand that Job was in sin and reaped ezackly what he sowed, which which Prot is going to sit still for that lol right.
but to attempt some sort of reply imo the v has been misinterped, bc misxlated, and so the Q is moot, sorry. "Worshipping clay" is not in view imo, and all of these men spoke what they "knew," satan's dialectic iow, which iow closely mirrors our (not yours and mine right now) forum interactions today, mostly all stating "facts" and agreeing with each other--if at all--in raised voices?
“Predates the rest of our Bible” this used to concern me as I doubted Job. Not any more. God’s words to Job alone make it necessary for the whole of the word. Get what you are saying about Job...it appears (imo) he was the same as Saul/Paul...who had his own righteousness and had heard of God but then sees Him.which i hope i did not give the impression that i get Job ok, bc i sure do not. What i have discovered is that despite what is widely believed it likely predates the rest of our Bible, it is the first "poetic" Book, and Job repented of something, twice, that God seemed to immediately contradict. I get some very tiny pieces, maybe
@VictoryinJesus“Predates the rest of our Bible” this used to concern me as I doubted Job. Not any more. God’s words to Job alone make it necessary for the whole of the word. Get what you are saying about Job...it appears (imo) he was the same as Saul/Paul...who had his own righteousness and had heard of God but then sees Him.
@VictoryinJesus
Job is amazing: "Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him" (Job 13.15). True faith indeed.
Queen James Anglish rolleyesYou don’t have to apologize for my error. I’m glad you pointed it out. Still not clear as I wasn’t familiar with the mistranslation(that happens to me a lot).
bada bing. Big clue to Job imofarouk, hate to disagree but I might have to. Job 13:15 Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him: but I will maintain mine own ways before him.
I’ve always loved that verse too and still do, but it is the “but I will maintain mine own ways before him.”
ha, dont be so sure that they arent connected imo :)Elihu was the younger of the elders...and waited to speak ...there were three friends then a fourth. Where did he come from? Not that they are connected but it does make me think of the fiery furnace and the fourth in the form of the Son of God.
sorry, no idea what a "daysman" is?it is the depth of Elihu’s words which also make me consider the daysman. Job 9:32-33 For he (God)is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him, and we should come together in judgment. [33] Neither is there any daysman betwixt us, that might lay his hand upon us both.
I am the same as you in God's sightSo the “thy wish in God’s stead” or “thy wish in God’s place” may be wrong or mistranslated. But haven’t we asked for that? An image of a man sitting on the throne? Same as they asked for a different king. Doesn’t man still often ask for a go between instead of praying directly to God?
ya, nice imo. That Job predates the rest of our Bible is a theory, but i guess it was maybe adapted from a much older tale, by Hammurabi i think? could be wrong“Predates the rest of our Bible” this used to concern me as I doubted Job. Not any more. God’s words to Job alone make it necessary for the whole of the word. Get what you are saying about Job...it appears (imo) he was the same as Saul/Paul...who had his own righteousness and had heard of God but then sees Him.
Queen James Anglish rolleyes
bada bing. Big clue to Job imo
ha, dont be so sure that they arent connected imo :)
sorry, no idea what a "daysman" is?
I am the same as you in God's sight
Look, you and I both belong to God
Behold, I am toward God as you are
I am just like you before God
Behold, I belong to God like you
Behold, I am according to thy wish in God's stead
the first five i get; the last one is gibberish to me, wadr, not saying it is misxlated or wrong for 200 years ago though, sorry didnt mean that
although i gotta agree with your point here, yup!
ya, nice imo. That Job predates the rest of our Bible is a theory, but i guess it was maybe adapted from a much older tale, by Hammurabi i think? could be wrong
ya, nice imo. That Job predates the rest of our Bible is a theory, but i guess it was maybe adapted from a much older tale, Hammurabi“Predates the rest of our Bible” this used to concern me as I doubted Job. Not any more. God’s words to Job alone make it necessary for the whole of the word. Get what you are saying about Job...it appears (imo) he was the same as Saul/Paul...who had his own righteousness and had heard of God but then sees Him.
ah well, dang nice, ty, ill hafta think on that one a little. Seems to contradict the intent displayed in the first five to me right nowI look at it like...Job lamented that there was no mediator, right? So, he says, according to you wish, I am a man like you and have come in"stead" of God. To me, he is Jesus being foretold.
once again to be saved you must be living have life/breath in you and a clear mind .not never has there ever been a person saved after they have died read your bible might i add this is not my thoughts but scriptureAnd take it up with Paul since he's the one who said all Israel will be saved.
I'll wait for the scripture.once again to be saved you must be living have life/breath in you and a clear mind .not never has there ever been a person saved after they have died read your bible might i add this is not my thoughts but scripture