Nope. There was flood legends in South America.
Flood Legends from the Americas, Part 3: Mexico to South America
And there were flood legends in North America. Take your pick.
Source:
List of flood myths - Wikipedia
I actually was not going to ask that. I am not generally focused on the Creation issues all that much anymore, but I do ask these things when I am faced with those who fall into the general consensus of what is commonly known as Liberalism by Conservative Christianity (Whether you accept that label or not). I know Answers in Genesis believe that a dog on the Ark was not many kinds of dogs but only one dog kind and not breeds of dogs. They believe that this theory is supported by Science in genetics. You can check out that article
here. I really cannot confirm or deny this. I am not a genetics or animal expert and neither was I there to witness the event. I simply believe God's Word that the flood was global because it says the flood waters covered the highest mountains and the high hills under the whole of heaven were covered.
Genesis 7:19-22
“And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth;
and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail;
and the mountains were covered. And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.”
So it sounds like you lean more towards a local flood because you don't believe all the animals could have fit on the Ark. So yes. This kind of belief falls into the Liberal camp once again.
This is simply a mockery of God's Word.
2 Peter 3:5-7
“For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.”
So you are looking for the truth? This does not make any sense. If person is a Christian, they have already found the truth and they don't need to keep seeking for what they have already found. Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6). Jesus says to God the Father His Word is truth (John 17:17). Daniel calls the Scriptures as the Scripture of truth (See: Daniel 10:21). So if you are still seeking for truth, then you have not accepted these truths in His Word? Now, a person can learn more truths within God's Word (the Bible), but the truth is available to them at their fingertips by opening the pages of the Bible.
Did I say KJB denomination? I said a KJB Only church. Meaning, they hold to King James Bible as the one and only authority for all matters of faith and practice.
Uh huh. So what do you have as an alternative that is better?
You keep boasting in your superiority of knowledge on this topic, and yet you are not edifying anyone with it.
How does that help anyone?
There is a difference between man made rules vs. rules found in New Testament given to us by Jesus and His followers. Do you believe we should keep the commands of Jesus and His followers? Do you see that the Bible has to be corrected sometimes on this issue or topic?
Do you not realize God is in control of life and death? There are no accidents in life. Nothing in life can happen without God's sovereign approval. Job lost all his children. But he still worshiped God. It was a test of faith in God. The Lord gives, and the Lord takes away. Death is not the end. So put down your weapon. I mean, if we are to take your mentality here, then you would probably ended up killing the apostle Paul. In fact, I remember talking online with a Christian who worked for something like SWAT. He was about to take down one of his targets, but something held him back in pulling the trigger. He later talked with this guy he was about to shoot and his potential victim witnessed to him about Jesus Christ. It's how he came to the faith. So the man he was about to shoot led him to Jesus Christ.
So that is your opinion and not anything that is remotely established. Jesus criticized many on a wide variety of topics. That does not equate with your accusation of sounding culty. Do you not also try to nail others down on other topics you feel are really important? Is there not a truth you feel is worth fighting for? Critical from a biblical perspective by a Christian is only done to correct as 2 Timothy 3:16 says we can do. Do you not know that the Bible talks about how others held to false doctrines (false beliefs)? Do you not think that we are supposed to correct (criticize) other's false beliefs? Is that not why we are having a Bible discussion in the first place? No Bible discussion or debate would exist if we did not criticize the other belief we felt was wrong. So I don't see this as being exclusive to cult talk. That just silly. You need to prove that this a defining characteristic of cults and not others. By your definition everyone who talks on Christian forums would be culty. So far you have not really demonstrated this as being true.
Thank you. But I don't think that is proper English. I don't think one person can be a cult. Usually a cult involves a following of the radical unhealthy crazy beliefs of one person or a group of people. No followers and there is no cult.
Cult - Wikipedia
The question about ice cream was sarcasm. Did you really not think it was not sarcasm?
Anyways, I was asking you to explain in your own words what the Sodomites were intending to do the two angels.
Yet you are evasive with the truth on this point.
There is nothing to prove. It's obvious. Even sin and still be saved Eternal Security Proponents know that Genesis 19 is talking about Sodomy or homosexuality. To say so otherwise is to be really way off in left field somewhere.
Wow. This is crazy. Wow. That's... just like. Wow. You actually believe this? Amazing.
Anyways, this belief would make you a liberal according to the general consensus of evangelical Christianity and even basic informational websites reporting on such a topic or issue.
Either way you slice it... the result is God's Holy Word that is perfect.
So you believe all bibles have errors in them? If so... who gets to decide what is true or false?
You? Some scholar? Where is the final authority rest?
So then you or the scholar becomes the final word of authority over the Bible that you and or the scholar needs to correct. Is this why you are still seeking for truth?