What I mean is your Fake News statistics are worthless
Oh I see, but your statisitcs are completely reliable and backed up by actual research?????? Wow if I had a nickel for everytime I heard this line about teh shots.
The hospitals are not at fault and you can't sue the jab mfgrs! What, you don't know that?
Yes you can sue the hospitals and the manufacturers if they put something other than a covid vaccine in the vials. You cannot sue them for side effects.
This issue is not "how" it's diagnosed - it's the "when" and "where" - which is "all the time" and "all over the place since the jabs started"...and if you'd turn off the Fake News and consume some decent conservative news, you'd know that. I bet you haven't even heard of Project Veritas, let alone watched their videos which is doing the job the Fake News refuses to do.
YOu really don't check your facts much do you?
The incidence of myocarditis is approximately
1.5 million cases worldwide per year. Incidence is usually estimated between 10 to 20 cases per 100,000 persons. The overall incidence is unknown and probably underdiagnosed. In the United States, the frequency of myocarditis is difficult to ascertain as many cases are subclinical.
From the reported hospital data to NIH and WHO reporting agencies. This is before covid shots.
Associations between COVID-19 and myocarditis were estimated using a multiple logit model with the following covariates: three-way interaction between COVID-19, sex, and age group, including lower-order interactions and main effects; race/ethnicity; payer type; hospital U.S. Census region; and hospital urbanicity. Adjusted risk differences (aRDs, measure of absolute risk) were calculated as the difference between 1) the adjusted predicted risk for myocarditis (outcome) among patients with COVID-19 (exposed group) and 2) adjusted predicted risk for myocarditis among patients without COVID-19 (unexposed group); adjusted risk ratios (aRRs, measure of relative risk) were calculated as the ratio of the adjusted predicted risk among exposed to the adjusted predicted risk among unexposed§§ (
7,
8). All models used standard errors clustered on a unique hospital identifier. R (version 4.0.2; R Foundation) and Stata (version 15.1; StataCorp) were used to conduct all analyses. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.¶¶
During 2020, the number of myocarditis inpatient encounters (4,560) was 42.3% higher than that during 2019 (3,205). Peaks in myocarditis inpatient encounters during April–May 2020 and November 2020–January 2021 generally aligned with peaks in COVID-19 inpatient encounters (
Figure 1).
Within the cohort of 36,005,294 patients, 1,452,773 (4.0%) received a diagnosis of COVID-19 during March 2020–January 2021, and 5,069 (0.01%) received a diagnosis of myocarditis during March 2020–February 2021. Overall, 4,339 (85.6%) patients with myocarditis were identified by an inpatient encounter. Patients with myocarditis were slightly older than patients without myocarditis (median age = 54 years versus 50 years) and were more commonly male (59.3% versus 41.7%) (Supplementary Table,
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109261).
Among patients with myocarditis, 2,116 (41.7%) had a history of COVID-19; this percentage was similar among males (42.4%) and females (40.9%) and differed by age group, with the lowest percentages among persons aged 16–24 years (23.7%) and 25–39 years (24.1%) and the highest among adults aged ≥75 years (64.6%) (
Table). Among the 2,116 patients with COVID-19 and myocarditis, 1,895 (89.6%) received a diagnosis of COVID-19 and myocarditis during the same month; the remaining patients received a myocarditis diagnosis 1 month (139; 6.6%) or ≥2 months (82; 3.9%) after their COVID-19 diagnosis.
During March 2020–January 2021, the risk for myocarditis was 0.146% among patients with COVID-19 and 0.009% among patients without COVID-19. Among patients with COVID-19, the risk for myocarditis was higher among males (0.187%) than among females (0.109%) and was highest among adults aged ≥75 years (0.238%), 65–74 years (0.186%), and 50–64 years (0.155%) and among children aged <16 years (0.133%).
Now all this gibberish means is this:
Your reporters are using the 5's instead of the actual numbers because the actual numbers show only small amounts of people above the norm. So a few added cases skew the %'ages much higher and makes it look more dangerous.
Once again the death rate for myocarditis is very very small and the full cure rate is very very high!
Whose publishing your textbooks? CNN? Fox News? The same people who crucified Dr. Malone, Dr. Tenpenny, and anyone else who won't toe your propagandist line?
As far as "not one documented", let's get something straight: this is an EXPERIMENTAL JAB that's only been around since yesterday, industrially speaking. It's essentially undergoing "trials" AFTER the product has gone to market, sidestepping arguably DECADES of testing, and the healthcare industry is forced to make educated guesses at this point, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that there is a definite connection between the jab and the explosion of cases of medical crises and deaths, both in number and previously unaffected demographics.
First off, cool your jets and slow down the hysterics.
Second off I have a daughter who is the chief reproting agent for her hospital and is on conference calls to state and federal officials reporting covid cases, shots and reported reactions. She has full access to teh data. Also the CDC, Harvard Med and the NIH. so unless you are a die hard conspiracy theorist those are solid credentials.
3. Yes the vaccine was brought to market quicker than nearly all drugs. Teh government got rid of a lot if red tape! Yes far less human clinincal tirlas were done. But the risk of covid was considered greater than potential problems of the shot. The irony here is most people scream that it takes so long to get a potential life saving drug to market, and when one hits quick- now a whole new bunch of people are screaming it wasn't tested enough.
4. Your explosion is like a lady finger firecracker, which is miniscule. As of August this year VAERS had 900,000 +or- reported cases of adverse reactions (ranging from death to sore arm) Even doubling that for unreported- over 90% of those reported are minor adverse effects. So that leaves 180,000 cases of reactions stronger than a sore arm , swelling or flu like symptoms. Approx 650,000,000 doses have been given.
So the total adverse reaction possibility is: .000267% IOW The odds of you not having any adverse reaction is 99.99973% SWo much for your explosion of cases!
Just like there was "no evidence of election fraud" in 2020, right? Biden legitimately won in the most "fair and secure" election ever where 180M votes were cast by 133M voters, right?
Because the authorities told you "no evidence", right?
This is just a red herring. One does not equate to the other. YOu can believe there was election fraud (I do myself) but without evidence it is just a belief without fact.
.