That is unusual-- very refreshing actually. Thank you.
For starters, the focus of the Sadducees question in
Matthew 22:23-30, isn't actually about marriage in Heaven. The real underlying focus on the question is the Sadducees trying to show that the idea of a resurrection is ridiculous, because they didn't believe in it and wanted to trip Christ up. Hence Christ's focus on the resurrection, which is the real issue of the Sadducees lack of understanding.
I don't believe that man by him/herself can create a bond that last into the eternities -- we lame sinners just don't have that power. Rather, it must be done with Christ's power: enacted with His priesthood authority and with two people whom have fully embraced Him. They hypothetical example in Matthew 22 doesn't include that authority in the bonds at all. Lacking His power/authority the bond dissolves, and the individuals involved are then single angels.
Now, of course Christ have gone on to this tangent of priesthood authority/power. But such would have not have tackled the bigger elephant in the room: the Sadducees lack of belief in the resurrection in the first place.
Therefore, I don't see any contradiction between Matthew 22 and my beliefs.
Of course I acknowledge and respect that other people have different views on this, both the big subject and the smaller subjects like priesthood authority. I respect that have have zero interest in trying to change anyone's mind. Just sharing my thoughts here.