This is what I call...here a bit, there a bit...
Can’t even answer a simple one like how we put in Christ by faith alone?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This is what I call...here a bit, there a bit...
Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.Romans 10:15
1) "And how shall they preach?" (pos de keruksosin) "And how may they herald, preach, or proclaim." To preach in civilized societies some unit of that society, or a friendly society, must give an open door to the preacher to preach. His message must be delivered with permission granted by the civil government, 1Pe_2:13-15.
2) "Except they be sent?" (ean me apostalosin) "if they are not commissioned," sent with authority and a live-hood provided? Administrative and enlistment labors must be authorized. "By what authority doest thou these things?" is a proper question, Mar_11:28; Jesus sent the church, calls preachers, who then are sent by the church as missionaries, Mat_21:23; Mat_28:18-20; Joh_20:21; Act_1:8; Act_13:1-4; 2Co_5:18.
3) "As it is written," (kathaper gegraptai) "As it has been written," in harmony with the writing of Isa_52:7.
4) "How beautiful are the feet," (hos horaioi hoi podes) "How beautiful or desirable are the feet"; The idea is that of a runner, a courier, a news-bearer who brings good news - a message of help and hope and delivery.
5) "Of them that preach the gospel of peace," (ton evangeli zomenon) "Of those who herald the good news," of salvation and peace, thru faith in Jesus Christ. Note that the good news of the coming Messiah was even a matter of beauty in Old Testament days, as the same plan of salvation was preached then, as now, by true prophets, Isa_61:1-2; Luk_4:18-19; Gal_5:13.
6) "And bring glad tidings of good things!" (agatha) "And bring glad tidings of good things!" good things that accompany salvation such as peace, joy, love, hope, faith, etc., Act_26:16-18; 1Co_2:9; 1Co_3:8; 2Co_5:1; 2Ti_4:7-8; Rev_22:12. That a new body awaits every believer in the resurrection, and rewards done, based on deeds done and service rendered to the Lord in this life and in the church in particular, in this age is a message of good tidings, in life and in death, Eph_3:21.
Indeed, that poses no break in and of itself. But it was that which was named by Peter and Paul that that does cause a break. Once "false teachers" were in the mix, the spirit of God did not remain with them.Thanks Scott. I don't feel you are "butting in". I appreciate everyone's opinion. You present an interesting theory.
How was there a 'breaking of succession of authority among men' when the Apostles LITERALLY replaced Judas (a man) with another man (Matthias)? And when the Apostles voted for a SUCCESION OF AUTHORITY AMONG MEN they referenced Scripture as their justification for SUCCESION OF AUTHORITY AMONG MEN (Acts 1:20). That is the first vs that destroys your theory.
Obeying does not justify the actions of false teachers, prophets, or leaders...it only vindicates those under them.The 2nd vs that destroys your theory is that Scripture makes it clear that we are to Obey those who rule over us and be submissive to them (Hebrews 13). So Scott, did that only pertain to the NT Christians? Did they and only they have to abide by this instruction in Scripture? Is your theory that once the last Apostle died there was no longer an AUTHORITY OF MEN to be submissive too?
That only tells of Paul's good intentions, and even so, he foretold how it would not go according to his desire for them.The 3rd vs that destroys your theory is what Paul told Timothy, 'what you have heard from me through many witnesses entrust to faithful people who will be able to teach others as well. That passage literally says that the teaching AUTHORITY AMONG MEN will be passed down to "faithful people" who will then teach others? Or did that AUTHORITY AMONG MEN end at some point? Notice how it was PAUL who wrote that? So your theory that Paul was teaching that there is a 'breaking of succession of authority among men' is bizarre since it was Paul that taught that there is a SUCCESION OF AUTHORITY AMONG MEN!
I have several other verses AND Christian historical writings that destroy your theory...but I will leave it at that.
Mary
Can’t even answer a simple one like how we put in Christ by faith alone?
Thanks Scott.Indeed, that poses no break in and of itself. But it was that which was named by Peter and Paul that that does cause a break. Once "false teachers" were in the mix, the spirit of God did not remain with them.....
Ok....soooooo that makes no sense. I agree with you that an apostle (small 'a') is one who is sent. But I am asking you about the last Apostle (capital 'A', one of the 12). Is your theory that when the Apostle John died there was no longer an AUTHORITY OF MEN to be submissive too? And your theory that "succession continues to all who receive Him" makes no sense. That makes EVERY Christian a successor to the Apostles.As for the last apostle, an apostle is simply one sent...of which succession continues to all who receive Him--not partakers only, but those who He has also received....
Also...Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.
Whoever teaches otherwise and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching that is in accordance with godliness, 4 is conceited, understanding nothing, and has a morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words. From these come envy, dissension, slander, base suspicions, 5 and wrangling among those who are depraved in mind and bereft of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain.
But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive opinions.
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.
Etc...Etc...
Those are the people I am exposing. Those that are destroying the word of God.
Mary
Your theory makes absoultly NO SENSE. Pauls "good intentions" was to teach Timothy the TRUTH and Pauls intention was to have Timothy teach other "faithful men" the TRUTH but Paul's intentions "did not go according to his desire for them"????????? Seriously?That only tells of Paul's good intentions, and even so, he foretold how it would not go according to his desire for them.
A question for youYour theory makes absoultly NO SENSE. Pauls "good intentions" was to teach Timothy the TRUTH and Pauls intention was to have Timothy teach other "faithful men" the TRUTH but Paul's intentions "did not go according to his desire for them"????????? Seriously?
The TRUTH was not passed down to other "faithful men" after Timothy got the Truth from Paul? Is that your theory???? The Truth was lost for all time after Timothy died?![]()
According to Bruder’s Concordance the word apostle appears about eighty times and denotes often not all the disciples of the Lord, but some of them specially called.A question for you
Do you believe there are still apostles running around?
Who are some of them specially called?According to Bruder’s Concordance the word apostle appears about eighty times and denotes often not all the disciples of the Lord, but some of them specially called.
So, yes, I believe there are "apostles running around"!
What do you believe Johann?
oops....you missed this question: What do you believe Johann?Who are some of them specially called?
There are no modern apostles roaming around, they are not sent and have not the exousia from God nor a witnessoops....you missed this question: What do you believe Johann?
I answered your question....Please don't dodge mine!![]()
Fascinating theory...There are no modern apostles roaming around, they are not sent and have not the exousia from God nor a witness
The men of The Church are "them" that are "specially called". Just like Scripture says: Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.Who are some of them specially called?
Who taught you this?There are no modern apostles roaming around, they are not sent and have not the exousia from God nor a witness
Please listen and learnFascinating theory...
Scripture says So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers, 12 to equip his people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up 13 until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.
Scripture says God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues.
Where does Scripture say those appointments in the church ended OR will end? Or have you been taught that there was a point in Christian history it (authority) ended?
Curious Mary
He would not remain with all who would take up the name of Christ and stand in the holy place, under the banner of the church.Thanks Scott.
You said that "the spirit of God did not remain with THEM" (emphasis mine). Who is "them"?
Curious Mary
I expect that it does not make sense to those who have been taught differently and adopted the error of "A" for men chosen for being the least of men, that Christ alone would prove worth. By the same (non-sensical) logic, you might also give all the sons of David an "A."Ok....soooooo that makes no sense. I agree with you that an apostle (small 'a') is one who is sent. But I am asking you about the last Apostle (capital 'A', one of the 12). Is your theory that when the Apostle John died there was no longer an AUTHORITY OF MEN to be submissive too? And your theory that "succession continues to all who receive Him" makes no sense. That makes EVERY Christian a successor to the Apostles.