World economic forum kept refering to an individual but not by name

[teamventure]

Infront of diplomats from all around the world, a speaker Prince Charles kept refering to an unnamed individual, with phrases like: "he must have trillions of dollars at his disposal." Instead of we or our.

It is clear to me that not only do they have the antichrist picked out, but he's already active behind the scenes.
They know who he is but we won't know until the time.

Everytime a leader has rose to prominence and people have speculated if they are the antichrist that in itself has proven that person unqualified because he won't be revealed until the time.

They have him picked out and aren't dropping any names.

Edit: here's the video:

 

[bt159722]

From which video or article are you talking about?

 

[ButterflyJones]

This was formerly their most recent live feed. Activity begins at 9:37.

Live: World Economic Forum 2023 opening and special address | WEF 2023

Opening plenary with message by the WEF Chairperson Klaus Schwab, message by the Swiss confederation, followed by a special address. EC President Ursula von ...

www.youtube.com

Is this what the OP is referring to?

 

[Cassandra]

The Antichrist will be a leader who is also a religious figure.

 

[ButterflyJones]

The Antichrist will be a leader who is also a religious figure.

The Pope?
He's an avowed ecumenist and the dictator one of if not the smallest sovereign nations, with the largest population of "citizens".

 

[teamventure]

This was formerly their most recent live feed. Activity begins at 9:37.

Live: World Economic Forum 2023 opening and special address | WEF 2023

Opening plenary with message by the WEF Chairperson Klaus Schwab, message by the Swiss confederation, followed by a special address. EC President Ursula von ...

www.youtube.com

Is this what the OP is referring to?

Yes that's it.

 

[ButterflyJones]

Yes that's it.

I was hoping to review a transcript that often times accompanied YT videos, but didn't see a link.

 

[teamventure]

The Antichrist will be a leader who is also a religious figure.

I think you are confusing the antichrist with the false prophet who will be a religious leader.

 

[ewq1938]

I think you are confusing the antichrist with the false prophet who will be a religious leader.

The Ac is also called the false prophet. He has many names.

 

[quietthinker]

What specifically qualifies the AntiChrist?

 

[Truth7t7]

The Pope?
He's an avowed ecumenist and the dictator one of if not the smallest sovereign nations, with the largest population of "citizens".

It's my opinion that the Pope is in line for the job of (The False Prophet) the Antichrist or (The Beast) will be a King/Ruler of Jewish/Hebrew decent

The Future Human Man, The Antichrist Seen Below In (Daniel) 11:37 Will Be A Hebrew/Jew In Decent, His Fathers Worshipped The True Hebrew (God Of His Fathers)

(Daniel) 11:36-37KJV
36 And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.

Examples: God Of His Fathers

(2 Kings) 21:22KJV
22 And he forsook the Lord God of his fathers, and walked not in the way of the Lord.

(2 Chronicles) 21:10KJV
10 So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day. The same time also did Libnah revolt from under his hand; because he had forsaken the Lord God of his fathers.

 

[Truth7t7]

The Ac is also called the false prophet. He has many names.

Your claim is "False" (The Beast) and (The False Prophet) will be separate individual living humans

Revelation 19:20KJV
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

 

[ewq1938]

Your claim is "False" (The Beast) and (The False Prophet) will be separate individual living humans

Revelation 19:20KJV
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

Your claim is false. The beast with ten horns is an empire of ten kings and kingdoms spread out within 7 mountains not a person, Rev 17.

No biblical writer ever spoke of the AC and some other person with him. Everyone only spoke of one person by himself, aside from ten kings he uses to rule the world.

 

[Wrangler]

Your claim is "False" (The Beast) and (The False Prophet) will be separate individual living humans

Revelation 19:20KJV
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

Your claim is false. The beast with ten horns is an empire of ten kings and kingdoms spread out within 7 mountains not a person, Rev 17.

No biblical writer ever spoke of the AC and some other person with him. Everyone only spoke of one person by himself, aside from ten kings he uses to rule the world.

@Truth7t7 quoted Rev 19:20 that obviously refers to 2 people. No response to that verse?

 

[Davy]

The Pope?
He's an avowed ecumenist and the dictator one of if not the smallest sovereign nations, with the largest population of "citizens".

No. The coming Antichrist-false-Messiah will claim to be the Jewish Messiah of The Bible. He will claim to be the one the orthodox Jews have been waiting for.

 

[ewq1938]

@Truth7t7 quoted Rev 19:20 that obviously refers to 2 people. No response to that verse?

The beast is not a person, nor is it a literal beast. My response was Rev 17, which explains what the beast is and it is not explained as a person. Since when is a person ten kingdoms within 7 areas of land?

 

[ButterflyJones]

Your claim is false. The beast with ten horns is an empire of ten kings and kingdoms spread out within 7 mountains not a person, Rev 17.

No biblical writer ever spoke of the AC and some other person with him. Everyone only spoke of one person by himself, aside from ten kings he uses to rule the world.

The Anti-Christ doesn't appear in the Book of Revelation.

They are referred to in 1st John.

 

[ewq1938]

The Anti-Christ doesn't appear in the Book of Revelation.

They are referred to in 1st John.

He is referred to in Rev and other books but by other names.

 

[Davy]

The beast is not a person, nor is it a literal beast. My response was Rev 17, which explains what the beast is and it is not explained as a person. Since when is a person ten kingdoms within 7 areas of land?

It actually is... a person also though. The 1st beast of Rev.13 is about a kingdom beast. But the "another beast" of Rev.13:11 forward is about a beast person that will come to work those great signs, wonders, and miracles to deceive the whole world with.

Rev.17 when speaking of the 7th king that is still to come, that will be the Rev.13:11 "another beast".

Thus, we should never care what a preacher says when it counters the written Scripture. And there are certain denominational seminary factions that try to teach there is no Antichrist person written of, which is a lie.

 

[ButterflyJones]

No. The coming Antichrist-false-Messiah will claim to be the Jewish Messiah of The Bible. He will claim to be the one the orthodox Jews have been waiting for.

There is a teaching in YouTube that makes that case and says Jesus was the Antichrist prophesied in those passages. There's even a reference to the icons that appear in the RCC bearing various symbols besides the image of Jesus, including Jesus hand gestures, that confirm the point.

The producer of the teaching looked at the scriptures objectively as literature only, not having a religious bias, to make the case.