prophecy questions about God's Timelines - invitation...

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Ronald D Milam

Active Member
Jan 12, 2022
975
128
43
59
Clanton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Not in Revelation 1:5.
He is already called Jesus Christ in that verse, so he is already understood to be the Lord. (smile), SMH.

Identify the word "Anti-Christ" in the verse.

Then identify the OT Hebrew or Aramaic word for "Anti-Christ".

Then throw your Scofield RB back in the round file from whence it came.
Anti-Christ is a CATCH ALL for like 33 different names, The Little Horn, the Beast, the Assyrian, the Wicked One, etc. etc. The fact you make this childlike point proves you are not being serious, and that I have detroyed all of your points. We use Anti-Christ because John points to "THAT Anti-Christ" in his epistle. We can call him cornbread if you want to, its just a tag. That's why your point us nonsensical.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
4,572
1,871
113
73
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
He is already called Jesus Christ in that verse, so he is already understood to be the Lord. (smile), SMH.
He is already called Messiah the Prince in Daniel 9:25. Capitalization is irrelevant. :laughing:
Anti-Christ is a CATCH ALL for like 33 different names, The Little Horn, the Beast, the Assyrian, the Wicked One, etc. etc. The fact you make this childlike point proves you are not being serious, and that I have detroyed all of your points. We use Anti-Christ because John points to "THAT Anti-Christ" in his epistle. We can call him cornbread if you want to, its just a tag. That's why your point us nonsensical.
So Anti-Christ is a CATCH ALL for Messiah in Daniel 9:26.

Riiiiiiiiight.

There is only one individual identified as a prince in Daniel 9:25-26. He is Messiah.

The grammatical antecedents/referents of all "he's" in Daniel 9:27 resolve back to Him.

That's why your Anti-Christ is a figment of premil/dispen hallucination.

Unknown in post-apostolic orthodox NT Christianity before the 19th century.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rwb

Ronald D Milam

Active Member
Jan 12, 2022
975
128
43
59
Clanton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
He is already called Messiah the Prince in Daniel 9:25. :laughing:
Goodness you are awful at prophecy. Once again, you are feigning ignorance, its childish. The Messiah who DIES is not the Prince to come because he has ALREADY COME. If you cant understand it, leave it alone.

So Anti-Christ is a CATCH ALL for Messiah in Daniel 9:26.

Riiiiiiiiight.
The Anti-Christ is a CATCH ALL for the prince to come, not the Messiah who dies after week 69. I shall not debate it with you further because you know exactly the point being made. If not you should stop trying to teach this to anyone else. PERIOD. Its like a teacher who doesn't know 2 + 2 = 4, either way, you do nit need to be teaching math of you do not understand 2 + 2 = 4.

I know more about prophecy than you have time to learn.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
4,572
1,871
113
73
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Goodness you are awful at prophecy. Once again, you are feigning ignorance, its childish. The Messiah who DIES is not the Prince to come because he has ALREADY COME. If you cant understand it, leave it alone.


The Anti-Christ is a CATCH ALL for the prince to come, not the Messiah who dies after week 69. I shall not debate it with you further because you know exactly the point being made. If not you should stop trying to teach this to anyone else. PERIOD. Its like a teacher who doesn't know 2 + 2 = 4, either way, you do nit need to be teaching math of you do not understand 2 + 2 = 4.

I know more about prophecy than you have time to learn.

Until you can cease your blasphemous attempts to contort Christ into antichrist, you should leave this prophecy to the united testimony of historic Christianity and those who have faithfully proclaimed and adhered to it for two millennia.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,852
3,273
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
How do you propose this will come to pass?
Future Events Unfulfilled

Revelation 11:2KJV
2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.

Daniel 12:7-9KJV
7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.
8 And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?
9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.

Daniel 9:27KJV
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
3,362
1,444
113
72
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Reformed Preterist Eschatology Is A Farce

Sprinkling Infant Baptism found in many reformed churches today is a farce, found no place in scripture

If you want to discuss the beliefs of Reformed doctrine, why not start a thread on that subject, and stop trying to make the topic we're on about what you think Reformed doctrine teaches?
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
3,362
1,444
113
72
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This is true because the prince to come only comes 2000 some odd years later, when he makes the Agreement (Covenant in Hebrew simply means Agreement) with Israel and "THE MANY" which simply means Israel joins the E.U.

This seems to be fanciful thinking! What Scripture proof supports what you allege here? I don't find the E.U. mentioned anywhere in Scripture???
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
11,785
2,521
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So, you do not accept Martin Luther, and on another post you disparage Isaac Newton on the grounds that reformed eschatology wrongly count 490 years instead of 490 days. You also dismiss Moses sabbatical years as being the same thing Daniel’s weeks.

Would you like me to provide quotes from the early Church in support of the traditional view? If not, I’ll just leave you to your opinion.
Man, I get tired of some claimed Christians that keep trying to use Sir Isaac Newton as a competent Bible interpretation source!

Newton did NOT have Biblical literacy. He also delved into the Occult. And he tried... to predict the very last day of this world (which Jesus Himself said NO MAN KNOWS!).

So his Bible commentaries are not to be trusted for those in Christ Jesus.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,852
3,273
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you want to discuss the beliefs of Reformed doctrine, why not start a thread on that subject, and stop trying to make the topic we're on about what you think Reformed doctrine teaches?
I'm well aware of reformed preterist eschatology, I'm well aware of reformed infant baptism, no need to start a thread, these teachings are a farce, and projected to show reformed beliefs

The OP surrounds God's timeliness, and reformed preterism has to do with these timelines, Infant baptism shows error in reformed theology

Reformed churches aren't above scrutiny in debate, being exposed in their theology

Jesus Is The Lord
 
Last edited:

GRACE ambassador

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2021
2,391
1,550
113
71
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Precious friends @covenantee, @rwb, @jeffweeder, @MatthewG?

Is this Preterism "all prophecy fulfilled in 70 AD"?:

C.H. Spurgeon (1865) (Reformed baptist?)
“Did you ever regret the absence of the burnt-offering, or the red heifer, of any one of the sacrifices and rites of the Jews? Did you ever pine for the feast of tabernacle, or the dedication? No, because, though these were like the old heavens and earth to the Jewish believers, they have passed away, and we now live under a new heavens and a new earth, so far as the dispensation of divine teaching is concerned. The substance is come, and the shadow has gone: and we do not remember it.” (Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, vol. xxxvii, p. 354).

1) we now live (since 70 AD) under a figurative and symbolic "new heavens and new earth"?

2) there is symbolically and figuratively "no more time," we now live in eternity?

3) This is Very Confusing, not found in God's Word Of Truth, Rightly Divided:

As I stated earlier I am not much of (still TONS "Of YEARS"? to learn to be) a prophecy expert, and seems as if I should remain with my original calling of studying to be Approved Unto God as a Mystery expert...

Study to Be APPROVED Open Bible.png
Precious friend(s):

Grace, Peace, And JOY In Christ, And In His Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided (+ I and II)
!
 
Last edited:

GRACE ambassador

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2021
2,391
1,550
113
71
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Infant baptism shows error in reformed theology

Reformed churches aren't above scrutiny in debate,
I attended a reformed assembly for a few months, until I asked about infant baptism, and they
gave me a booklet that said: "we know it is not in Scripture, but it is our tradition."

Needless to say, Even as a "babe In Christ," I RAN!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Truth7t7

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,852
3,273
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I attended a reformed assembly for a few months, until I asked about infant baptism, and they
gave me a booklet that said: "we know it is not in Scripture, but it is our tradition."

Needless to say, I RAN!
Yes the tradition is called following "Roman Catholicism", in my opinion no different

Many Reformed branches have bowed their knee to Rome, also ecumenical communion, homosexuality, ordination of women, etc

The Lutheran Missouri Synod is about the last stand in my observation?
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
3,362
1,444
113
72
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I attended a reformed assembly for a few months, until I asked about infant baptism, and they
gave me a booklet that said: "we know it is not in Scripture, but it is our tradition."

Needless to say, I RAN!

It seems 7t7 has accomplished his goal! He cannot biblically support his doctrine, so rather than answer the questions submitted to him, he seeks to change the subject. Now he has you also turning the topic of this thread into questioning what Reformed doctrine teaches. Very discouraging. If you wish to discuss the doctrine of Reformed Theology, please start a new thread on that subject.
 

GRACE ambassador

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2021
2,391
1,550
113
71
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It seems 7t7 has accomplished his goal! He cannot biblically support his doctrine, so rather than answer the questions submitted to him, he seeks to change the subject. Now he has you also turning the topic of this thread into questioning what Reformed doctrine teaches. Very discouraging. If you wish to discuss the doctrine of Reformed Theology, please start a new thread on that subject.
I apologize for derailing my OWN thread; so 'preterism' is not reformed? I noted that
CH Spurgeon was a reformed baptist? Seems to be IF I question "his belief," I question
reformed belief???

Did you see my (probably third?-to-final) post #130?
 
Last edited:

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
4,572
1,871
113
73
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
I'm well aware of reformed preterist eschatology, I'm well aware of reformed infant baptism, no need to start a thread, these teachings are a farce, and projected to show reformed beliefs

The OP surrounds God's timeliness, and reformed preterism has to do with these timelines, Infant baptism shows error in reformed theology

Reformed churches aren't above scrutiny in debate, being exposed in their theology

Jesus Is The Lord
Infant baptism is a farce, but your second cutoff of Messiah is not a farce?
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,852
3,273
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It seems 7t7 has accomplished his goal! He cannot biblically support his doctrine, so rather than answer the questions submitted to him, he seeks to change the subject. Now he has you also turning the topic of this thread into questioning what Reformed doctrine teaches. Very discouraging. If you wish to discuss the doctrine of Reformed Theology, please start a new thread on that subject.
You wander off topically the time, pot, kettle black!

P.S. it's Grace ambassadors thread, are you going to be the hall monitor now, smiles
 

Christian Gedge

Well-Known Member
Jul 24, 2022
317
394
63
Waikato
5loaves2fishes.wixsite.com
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
@ Truth7t7 Im trying to assemble the posts relating to whether Daniel's 'weeks' were 7-day weeks or 7-year weeks. Please forgive me if some of these posts are out of sequence. If this what you are saying, I would like to make the point Covenantee made, "Africanus, Eusebius, Tertullian, and Jerome wrote more than 1,000 years before the Reformation." I am about to quote some of these early church statements shortly. I hope that we can look at them objectively without the unnecessary comments about the reformers. I will show that 7-year weeks were the understanding from the very beginning in the church.
Daniel's 70 weeks are 490 future literal days, and will start when a future command goes forth to build Jerusalem To Messiah that they wait for in deception

I'm surprised to hear you say this Truth7t7. Are you aware that the Church Fathers and historians treated them as 7 "weeks of years" - not "weeks of days?" - Africanus, Eusebius, Tertulian, Jerome, Luther and more - Would you like to hear their quotes?

Africanus, Eusebius, Tertullian, and Jerome wrote more than 1,000 years before the Reformation.

I have God's words in my hands, no different than the reformers

Daniel wrote 70 weeks, if he intended to mean 490 years he would have written (Four Hundred Ninety Years) he didn't, it's that simple

on another post you disparage Isaac Newton on the grounds that reformed eschatology wrongly count 490 years instead of 490 days. You also dismiss Moses sabbatical years as being the same thing Daniel’s weeks.

Would you like me to provide quotes from the early Church in support of the traditional view? If not, I’ll just leave you to your opinion.

Provide all the quotes you want, Daniel 9:24 states (Seventy Weekks) not (Four Hundred Ninety Years) its that simple

Your claim is false, you promote standard reformed eschatology in false teachings

Reformed Preterist Eschatology Is A Farce

Your reformed preterist teaching has nothing to offer but error from truth

If you want to discuss the beliefs of Reformed doctrine, why not start a thread on that subject, and stop trying to make the topic we're on about what you think Reformed doctrine teaches?

I'm well aware of reformed preterist eschatology, I'm well aware of reformed infant baptism, no need to start a thread, these teachings are a farce, and projected to show reformed beliefs

It seems 7t7 has accomplished his goal! He cannot biblically support his doctrine, so rather than answer the questions submitted to him, he seeks to change the subject. Now he has you also turning the topic of this thread into questioning what Reformed doctrine teaches. Very discouraging. If you wish to discuss the doctrine of Reformed Theology, please start a new thread on that subject.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truth7t7

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
11,785
2,521
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Precious friends @covenantee, @rwb, @jeffweeder, @MatthewG?

Is this Preterism "all prophecy fulfilled in 70 AD"?:

C.H. Spurgeon (1865) (Reformed baptist?)
“Did you ever regret the absence of the burnt-offering, or the red heifer, of any one of the sacrifices and rites of the Jews? Did you ever pine for the feast of tabernacle, or the dedication? No, because, though these were like the old heavens and earth to the Jewish believers, they have passed away, and we now live under a new heavens and a new earth, so far as the dispensation of divine teaching is concerned. The substance is come, and the shadow has gone: and we do not remember it.” (Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, vol. xxxvii, p. 354).

1) we now live (since 70 AD) under a figurative and symbolic "new heavens and new earth"?

2) there is symbolically and figuratively "no more time," we now live in eternity?

3) This is Very Confusing, not found in God's Word Of Truth, Rightly Divided:

As I stated earlier I am not much of (still TONS "Of YEARS"? to learn to be) a prophecy expert, and seems as if I should remain with my original calling of studying to be Approved Unto God as a Mystery expert...

View attachment 29029
Precious friend(s):

Grace, Peace, And JOY In Christ, And In His Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided (+ I and II)
!
The way I see it, Spurgeon was using that new heavens and a new earth idea as a figure of speech. I'm pretty sure he well knew we have not literally reached God's new heavens and a new earth time yet.

But hey, some folks on the 'Kingdom Now' theories actually do... believe that Christ's literal Kingdom is... here and now on earth, through us, and that it is our job to convert all nations today in order to bring His literal Kingdom now, without waiting for His return. Some of those folks support Satan's plans for a "one world government", i.e., New World Order.
 

Adventageous

Active Member
Oct 28, 2022
367
95
28
Noneya
archive.org
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
... Who is "the prince" (Vespasian or Titus?) and who are "the people (Roman soldiers?) of the prince"?

Thanks again for all your excellent help...
People of the Prince that shall come:


Dan 9:26 KJB - And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

Dan 9:26 HOT - ואחרי השׁבעים שׁשׁים ושׁנים יכרת משׁיח ואין לו והעיר והקדשׁ ישׁחית עם נגיד הבא וקצו בשׁטף ועד קץ מלחמה נחרצת שׁממות׃

Dan 9:26 HOT Str#/wRMAC - ואחריH310 השׁבעיםH7620 שׁשׁיםH8346 ושׁניםH8147 יכרתH3772 משׁיחH4899 ואיןH369 לו והעירH5892 והקדשׁH6944 ישׁחיתH7843 עםH5971 נגידH5057 הבאH935 וקצוH7093 בשׁטףH7858 ועדH5704 קץH7093 מלחמהH4421 נחרצתH2782

Dan 9:26 HOT translit. - w'achárëy haSHävuiym shiSHiym ûsh'nayim yiKärët mäshiyªch w'ëyn lô w'häiyr w'haQodesh yash'chiyt am nägiyd haBä w'qiTZô vaSHe†ef w'ad qëtz mil'chämäh nechéretzet shomëmôt
Even if one does not read Hebrew (which is unnecessary), but simply the English, carefully, and with the bible in mind in other places, which shed light upon these events, we can know for certain, that the "prince that shall come" was indeed Jesus Christ. How can we know from the English (KJB)?

[1] in Daniel 9:25, Jesus is called "Messiah the Prince" (משׁיח נגיד;
משׁיחH4899 נגידH5057; mäshiyªch nägiyd)

[2] in Daniel 9:26a, Jesus is again called "Messiah" (משׁיח; משׁיחH4899; mäshiyªch) and thus Daniel 9:26 is simply enlarging upon Daniel 9:25's "Messiah (a.) the Prince (b.)", when vs 26 says, "Messiah (a.) ... the prince (b.) that shall come ..."; in other words "the ruler" that was prophesied to be sent by God to rule all (Isaiah 9:6,7; Micah 5:2; Matthew 2:6).

[3] the word "prince" (נגיד ; נגידH5057; nägiyd) is only used for Jesus Christ the Messiah in all of Daniel, see Daniel 9:25,26, 11:22 ("prince of the covenant") as the anointed ruler thereof. Other examples in scripture of this are seen in the anointed kings of Israel (see 1 Samuel 25:30; 2 Samuel 6:21, 7:8; 1 Kings 1:35, 14:7, 16:2; 1 Chronicles 5:2, 11:2, 17:7, 28:4, 29:22; 2 Chronicles 6:5, 11:22), the anointed rulers of the priests (1 Chronicles 9:11,20, 12:27; 2 Chronicles 31:12,13, 35:8; Jeremiah 20:1; Nehemiah 11:11; or those associated, 1 Chronicles 26:24, 27:4), the leaders of the tribes of Israel (1 Chronicles 27:16), generals/captains over others (1 Chronicles 13:1; 2 Chronicles 11:11; Psalms 76:12), or as one like Job (Job 31:37). (There are a few rare instances in scripture where the word can be used in a general sense for any ruler or captain over others (Job 29:10), even an opposing ruler/s, captains (see 2 Chronicles 23:21; Ezekiel 28:2), but the context is always clear in these instances; and it can mean a few other things in rare instances (Proverbs 8:6)).

[4] Gabriel and Daniel (Daniel 10:20), under guidance of the Holy Ghost, when referring to a foreign power and its leadership thereof, as a 'prince' (such as in the case of Grecia), another word is used instead, which is (שׂר ;שׂר H8269; sar; which means 'ruler'), and thus the word, "prince" (נגיד ; נגידH5057; nägiyd)" in Daniel 9, in its own context and surrounding, is not a reference to the Roman ruler (Caesar) in Daniel 9, though the word "sar" can be applied.

[5] the entire context of Daniel 9 is the Messiah and His people,​
[a.] Daniel 9:24a, "thy (Daniel's) people", the Israelites
[b.] Daniel 9:24b, "thy (Daniel's) holy city, earthly Jerusalem
[c.] Daniel 9:24c,d,e,f,g,h - dealing with the sins of the professed people of God and the ministration of the Great High Priest/Jesus and his work on earth and in Heaven.
[d.] Daniel 9:25a, "the commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem" (found in Ezra 6:14, 7:1-28)
[e.] Daniel 9:25b, "Messiah the Prince" - Jesus Christ
[f.] Daniel 9:26a, "Messiah" - Jesus Christ
[g.] Daniel 9:26b, "the people of the prince" - Israelites
[h.] Daniel 9:26b, "of the prince that shall come" - Jesus, being ruler over "the people" sent of God, that was to "come"
[i.] Daniel 9:26c, "the city and the sanctuary" - earthly Jerusalem
[j.] Daniel 9:27a, "And he ..." - Jesus (Pronoun pointing back to a Noun, context, Messiah the Prince, Messiah ... the prince that shall come)
[k.] Daniel 9:27b "confirm the covenant with many for one week" - Jesus confirms the New Covenant with the Apostles (Hebrews 2:3) for the first half of the week (3 1/2 years unto AD 31, His death) and then confirms with the rest of the people through His Apostles, for 3 1/2 more years, unto the stoning of Stephen (AD 34) and the rejection of it by the Sanhedrin, as they had done to Jesus.
[l.] Daniel 9:27c, "he shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease" - Jesus (Pronoun pointing back to the Noun, Messiah the Prince), did this by His death, and thus there are no more sacrifices for sins as Hebrews 10:26, etc, explains.
[m.] Daniel 9:27d, "he shall make it (earthly sanctuary) desolate" - Jesus (Pronoun pointing back to a Noun) leaves and does not return to earthly Jerusalem, neither to the earthly temple ever again, see Matthew 23:38; Luke 13:35.​
[6] there are previous examples given to us in scripture, and Daniel himself experienced one of them.​
[a.] In the first destruction of Jerusalm and its Temple by Babylon and King Nebuchadnezzar, this very King is used by God to punish rebellious Israel, because they (the people) had rejected God, and so God withdrew, and allowed the city/temple to be destroyed. What brought the destruction? Israel's sins. Nebuchadnezzar is even called by God, "my servant" (Jeremiah 25:9).

[b.] In the events of Moses and the Israelites attempting to cross over into the promised land. Balak and Balaam came along, and could do nothing to affect them, that is until the people sinned, and so God withdrew His protection, and allowed destruction to come.​
There are numerous examples of this in scripture, see the book of Judges, etc.

Therefore, the same events repeated, as per Ecclesiastes 1:9, 3:15; in that when "the people" (of God) rejected the "Messiah the Prince", the "Messiah ... the prince that shall come" (as promised by God), they actually destroyed their own city and temple, because they rejected the protection God offered in Christ Jesus. When Jesus said, "Your house is left unto you desolate", it was in exact fulfillment of Daniel as was the statement of Jesus in reference to the destruction (Matthew 23:36) that would be brought about by such rejection and refusal to repent of sin and accept Him, their Messiah, their rightful Prince.

Did the Roman armies actually destroy Jerusalem? Only in after effect (as the Babylonians), for if the Jewish leadership had accepted the Messiah their prince, no such destruction could have come, for God would have dwelt in it, and its sanctuary.

The entire context of Daniel 9, is about God's people, sin, deliverance and the Messiah.

Who destroyed the city? God's own professed people by their neglect and refusal. Even as the human city/temple may so be destroyed:​
1Co_3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

Mat_5:14 Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.​
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: covenantee and rwb

Adventageous

Active Member
Oct 28, 2022
367
95
28
Noneya
archive.org
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
  • speaking through Stephen, when?:
"...they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears,and ran upon him with one accord, And cast him out of thecity, and stoned him..." (Acts 7:55-58)

Dan 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.​

Heb_10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,​

Heb 2:3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;​
Heb 2:4 God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?​
Rom 15:8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:​

It is not merely "spiritual", but even given in actual events by Jesus Himself.
[1] Baptism of the Holy Spirit upon Jesus begins His 3 1/2 years.​
[2] Works miracles, etc​
[3] persecuted​
[4] face glows, soldiers fall back​
[5] arrested​
[6] brought before Sanhedrin​
[7] "cut off" (cut out of the congregation by Sanhedrin at Trial)​
[8] martyred outside​

This pattern is followed in the lives of the Apostles/disciples, from Pentecost, thus we come to Stephen:

[1] Baptism of the Holy Spirit upon them, begins the latter 3 1/2 years.​
[2] work miracles, etc​
[3] persectued​
[4] arrested​
[5] brought before sanhedrin​
[6] face glows (as an angel), sanhedrin amazed​
[7] "cut off" (cut out of the congregation by Sanhedrin at Trial)​
[8] martyred outside​

There are also other parallels, such as between [9] Joseph of Arimathaea and Nicodemus and Gamaliel interfering. [10] Disputings with Christ and with Stephen. [11] False witnesses with Christ and with Stephen.

The Sanhedrin was the chief law in the land. The rejected the Head, but had not yet the body in full, and when they rejected Stephen, the body also was rejected, and they brought upon themselves their own destruction.

Jesus was seen "standing" in Acts 7. This was their end. See also parallels in Daniel 12:1 and Luke 13:25. When Jesus stands, it is the close of their allotted time, which was 490 years, even as Jesus told Peter in Matthew 18:22.

Do a study on "stand up", "arise", "lift up", in connection with God standing, as already given you, Daniel 12:1; Luke 13:25. It is the finality of mercy's probation, and the stepping in of judgment.

Psa_3:7 Arise, O LORD; save me, O my God: for thou hast smitten all mine enemies upon the cheek bone; thou hast broken the teeth of the ungodly.​
Psa_7:6 Arise, O LORD, in thine anger, lift up thyself because of the rage of mine enemies: and awake for me to the judgment that thou hast commanded.​
Psa_9:19 Arise, O LORD; let not man prevail: let the heathen be judged in thy sight.​
Psa_10:12 Arise, O LORD; O God, lift up thine hand: forget not the humble.​
Psa_12:5 For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, now will I arise, saith the LORD; I will set him in safety from him that puffeth at him.​
Psa_17:13 Arise, O LORD, disappoint him, cast him down: deliver my soul from the wicked, which is thy sword:​
Psa_44:23 Awake, why sleepest thou, O Lord? arise, cast us not off for ever.​
Psa_44:26 Arise for our help, and redeem us for thy mercies' sake.​
Psa_68:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm or Song of David. Let God arise, let his enemies be scattered: let them also that hate him flee before him.​
Psa_74:22 Arise, O God, plead thine own cause: remember how the foolish man reproacheth thee daily.​
Psa_82:8 Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.​
Psa_102:13 Thou shalt arise, and have mercy upon Zion: for the time to favour her, yea, the set time, is come.​
Psa_132:8 Arise, O LORD, into thy rest; thou, and the ark of thy strength.​
Psa_94:2 Lift up thyself, thou judge of the earth: render a reward to the proud.​
Amo_9:1 I saw the Lord standing upon the altar: and he said, Smite the lintel of the door, that the posts may shake: and cut them in the head, all of them; and I will slay the last of them with the sword: he that fleeth of them shall not flee away, and he that escapeth of them shall not be delivered.​
Act_7:55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,​
Act_7:56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.​
Luk 13:25 When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:​
Dan 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.​

Everlasting righteousness began with Jesus.

Jesus/Michael stood up in AD 34 [Acts 7:55-56 KJB], the end of the 70 weeks, in Daniel 9, and thus the close of the probation of the Jews as a nation, the sanhedrin, having rejected the Head and the body. He will so stand again [Daniel 12:1; Luke 13:25; Revelation 22:11 KJB, etc]
AD 27 + 3 1/2 = AD 31; crucifixion. The first of the final week of the 70 weeks, as Jesus told Peter [Matthew 18:22 KJB]​
AD 31 + 3 1/2 = AD 34; Stephen martyred. End of the 70 weeks, as we see in Hebrews 2:3 KJB​

Parallels [the short version, two rainbows]:

Jesus in AD 27 Anointed with the Holy Ghost, ministry 3 1/2 years, miracles, taken captive AD 31, rejected by the sanhedrin, condemned to death, dies outside the city

Disciples/Apostles in AD 31 anointed with the Holy Ghost at Pentecost, ministry 3 1/2 years, miracles, Stephen is taken captive AD 34, rejected by the sanhedrin, condemned to death, dies outside of the city.

Daniel 9:27 KJB - And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.​
Hebrews 10:12 KJB - But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God;​
Hebrews 10:26 KJB - For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,​
Hebrews 2:3 KJB - How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;​
Romans 15:8 KJB - Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:​

Through Christ Jesus, it is the end of sin, He brought in everlasting righteousness, reconciliation, etc.

Matthew 1:21 KJB - And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.​
Hebrews 9:26 KJB - For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.​
2 Corinthians 5:18 KJB - And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;​
2 Corinthians 5:19 KJB - To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
Hebrews 2:17 KJB - Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.​

Victory began with Jesus, and He went forth conquering and to conquer (Revelation 6:2) - undefeatable.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: covenantee and rwb