Where does it say in the Bible that “God” lowered himself in the form of a man?
If this is a reference to Phil 2, then you need to reread what it says….it says that the son existed “in God’s form”….what is God’s “form”?……John tells us that “God is a spirit”, so to be in God’s “form” the pre-human Jesus was also a glorious spirit, like all spirit creatures are. (John 17:5, 24)
The laws of redemption would have to be given a new definition if God himself were to become a mere mortal. But, if Jesus was the immortal God, then he could not die. If the redeemer did not die the same death as Adam, then the set price of redemption was not paid…..it would have been ridiculously over paid.
To redeem mankind, all the redeemer needed to be was sinless…the exact equivalent of Adam, to buy back what Adam lost for his children.
God’s law required “atonement”….at-one-ment…one for one. The law stated…”an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life”. The life offered to redeem the human race descended from Adam had to be the same as the one that was forfeited. An immortal God cannot pay for the sins of a mortal man. And there were now no sinless humans who could offer themselves to God to save their fellow humans.
God “sent” his own son to pay the ransom demanded under God’s unalterable law. (John 17:3)
He did this without hesitation and left his glorious spirit body to become a human embryo in the womb of a young virgin.
This insistence on Jesus being God does not find support in the Bible at all…..Jesus is what he called himself…”the son of God”…..not once is he called “God the Son”…the RCC made that up in order to promote their altered god. They swapped the “sun god” and made him the “son god”…..a simple shift in terminology imposed on its members who were not permitted access to God’s word and were kept in ignorance for centuries, compounding their lies with doctrine after doctrine that were all based on pagan Roman sun worship. Of all the Catholic doctrines that should have been discarded this should have been the first….it is a clear breach of the first Commandment to put another “god” in the Father’s place. It is blasphemy.
This is a clear case of humans creating their own box for their god, and trying to scripturally squeeze him into it….but there are too many bits that do not fit, so they simply cut them off, rather than accept the box he came in.