i guess not, as i am not rejecting that those chosen will seek after God; i am merely challenging that you or anyone else can define them in a universally accepted manner, or especially not one acceptable to God, the one that counts.
And that is after all the point here, ultimately, whether it is said overtly or not; "God predestines, this we know; and we have developed a checklist to determine who is called, and who is not, and you can trust us because after all we are "church fathers." Paul assures us that your church fathers are seekers after the world, strong men who wish to rend the kingdom, as demonstrated by their seeking after men's approval, and rejecting what scripture plainly teaches.
With all due respect you must admit to owning a standard by which you judge others as "saved" or "lost," that you have been indoctrinated into, by the people you trusted to interpret Scripture for you, yet if we examined them closely, i could demonstrate how they have been compromised, and all signed Contracts for Jesus, and invited you to call them "father," and a hundred other violations of Scripture, too, that you doubtless do not want to debate, or even look into too deeply.
And i am not asking you to, ok; as i doubt that these define your faith completely anyway. I am not interested in contesting your beliefs against my interpretation of Scripture. Your beliefs are irrelevant to me--and to God--as strange as that maybe sounds, ok. We even have parables for this, multiple, more than one, that examine the concept from more than one angle.
So yes God certainly predestines; and no, you are not qualified to point them out imo, and neither am i.