- Feb 24, 2015
- 1,765
- 439
- 83
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Dreams are not a spiritual gift, so your comparison is flawed. Tongues are a spiritual gift.
Never said that dreams was a spiritual gift, Stranger. Not every dream comes from the Lord for why we are to prove all things by the scripture.
Your experience with 'cussing' is yours alone and cannot be transferred to Bible interpretation.
My hearing God speaking to me has to be proven by the scripture and that is the point for every believer in discerning a supernatural encounter.
Your experience doesn't prove ones experience who has the gift of tongues.
That experience has nothing to do with the experience with tongues; that reference was about why we are to prove every supernatural encounter by the scriptures.
That tongues can be for just the believer is proved in Scripture. (1 Cor. 14:4) "He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself..." And there is nothing wrong with that. Where does Scripture say there is?
Scripture does say plainly, "Wherefore brethren, ...forbid not to speak with tongues."
Stranger
As you read 1 Corinthians 14th chapter from the beginning....
Paul begins exhorting believers to desire spiritual gifts, but to exhort them to seek after the gift of prophesy, and began explaining why by comparing the gift of tongues with the gift of prophesy by showing why tongues is not a stand alone gift for why prophesy is better because it needs no interpretation.
So Paul concludes why believers zealous for spiritual gifts should seek the gift of prophesy over tongues.
Next, Paul is explaining why he was demoting tongues as the gift to seek after by explaining the necessity for that tongue to be interpreted in order for that tongue to edify the assembly.
Having said that in verse 12, Paul explains the proper use of tongues in that the tongue speakers are to pray that someone else may interpret that tongue so that the tongue speaker may understand it and be fruitful to the tongue speaker too.
So his closing to verse 14, is just re enforcing why prophesy is the gift to seek after over the gifts of tongues because tongues is not a stand alone gift for why it needs to come with interpretation from another to benefit the tongue speaker and not just the assembly.
1 Corinthians 12:7-13 pretty much is Paul's premise for what tongues can only be used for. The breakdown is below.
1 Corinthians 12:10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:
Per Strong's Concordance;
http://www.sacrednamebible.com/kjvstrongs/index2.htm
"divers" was inserted from the Greek word "glwsswn" meaning "of uncertain affinity; the tongue; by implication, a language (specially, one naturally unacquired):--tongue."
The grouping of 3 Greek words in the blue in paralleling that verse runs as "genh glwsswn allw" with genh meaning "from ginomai - ginomai 1096; "kin" (abstract or concrete, literal or figurative, individual or collective):--born, country(-man), diversity, generation, kind(-red), nation, offspring, stock."
And the third Greek word "allw" meaning "a primary word; "else," i.e. different (in many applications):--more, one (another), (an-, some an-)other(-s, -wise)."
It is the same as saying someone will get a different kind of tongues from another country than what he is normally familiar with for why interpretation of that foreign tongue will follow in the context of that verse 10 above.