justbyfaith
Well-Known Member
prophecy of scripture...he is talking about the holy scriptures.CONTEXT! He is talking about prophecy!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
prophecy of scripture...he is talking about the holy scriptures.CONTEXT! He is talking about prophecy!
prophecy of scripture...he is talking about the holy scriptures.
Strong's #3404.But it says hate him. Not hate "in comparison to ect." It simply says hate them. Hate them all. Nowhere does it add the "in comparison" thing you did. That's what YOU said, not Scripture.
You're simply wrong here.Prophecy is an aspect of Scripture, but not all Scripture is prophecy.
Sorry, nope.
Strong's #3404.
miseo, mis-eh'-o; from a primary misos (hatred), to detest (espec. to persecute), by extens. to love less.---hate(-ful).
No, you did not.You said that verses can stand alone. Here I proved they cannot stand alone as you have them do to support your feelings theology.
Is it not the Greek (the original autograph) that matters most?So.... Strong's can interpret Scripture, but other Scripture can't?
No, you did not.
I have shown that in the original autograph, the verse in question stands on its own as a bastion of spiritual truth.How so? Every verse you quoted, I showed you that [many times within the same chapter]
You contradicted yourself. And it was Scripture saying that you contradicted yourself.
I have showed that in the original autograph, the verse in question stands on its own as a bastion of spiritual truth.
You did not show that at all. I showed you how your reasoning was flawed, although you may not have seen it due to spiritual blindness.Every verse you quoted, I showed you that [many times within the same chapter]
You contradicted yourself. And it was Scripture saying that you contradicted yourself.
Your point?.... When you use Strong's to interpret rather than other Scripture.
Your point?
Do we not go to the Strong's to look further into what it says in the original?
I didn't say that other scripture can't. I was merely using the Strong's to support my point that every singular verse stands on its own, in defense of your attack on that statement.But not other Scriptures. Why does Strong's have the right to interpret God's word but other Scripture can't?
I didn't say that other scripture can't. I was merely using the Strong's to support my point that every singular verse stands on its own, in defense of your attack on that statement.
That's not even the issue. The issue is distorting (1) the character of God, (2) the character of Christ, (3) the Gospel and (4) Bible truth.You make it out that God is unjust, unfair, cruel even if He doesn't offer everyone a chance at salvation.
That's not even the issue. The issue is distorting (1) the character of God, (2) the character of Christ, (3) the Gospel and (4) Bible truth.
When a group -- regardless of label -- distorts Scripture, that is a very serious matter. Whether it is the Catholics or the Reformed. Or any cult for that matter.
The truth is that GOD DOES OFFER SALVATION TO ALL. And that is how the Gospel must be preached.
That's exactly what the Westminster Confession, the London Baptist Confession, etc. say. Just using different terminology.Does Christ shunt others? Such a statement is calling God out for his ways and decrees. I'd tread lightly.