Rapture Top Dogs Admit no Proof Exists.

[Dave L]

Troll

Frustrated?

 

[Dave L]

Prophecy says you are wrong.

Once again you make a declaration without a single verse of proof.

Hard to post what doesn't exists, so you just pontificate.

Romans 11 spells it out. Notice; “And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.” (Romans 11:23)

To whom are they grafted into? Themselves? Or into Christ who is Israel?

 

[Dave L]

Dave L you are the only one here to elevate yourself as the sole interpreter of the Word of God & you do so by accusing anyone that disagrees with your view as a deceiver and false prophet and your use of those terms in this situation to falsely accuse has no Biblical basis.
Interesting that no one else on this thread, has placed themselves as spokesperson for God but you. The Bible says the hypocrites will be judged by their own words, so you might want to withdraw your conceited, false allegations against other members of the Body of Christ. You are the only one who slanders those that disagree with your views, while you promote your own view as the only "right" one.
There are differences the Body of Christ concerning the Rapture & the Trib and I see no one running around accusing others of being a false prophet or deceiver because of differing views but you.
Everyone else on this thread are content to disagree & debate.
Copperhead shows discernment and speaks the honest truth in his response to you.
You can call me whatever name you care to, I see where it's coming from & your accusations reveal your fruit.

The entire Church knew we are biblical Israel until Dispensationalism polluted Christendom with false prophecy. Study Church history before making your unfounded claims.

 

[Dave L]

The Bible doesn't say that. The Israel of the tribulation is vastly dominated by Judaism and secularism.

The great tribulation was purely Jewish and happened in 70AD. Just as Jesus said it would.

 

[Dave L]

There were no Christians in the Old Testament days.

The disciples (of all time) were called Christians first at Antioch. They were called the Congregation of the Lord (Jesus) in the OT.

 

[Copperhead]

Frustrated?

Not in the least, Troll. You have still yet to acknowledge how you love to accuse the brethren of what would be capital offenses in ancient Israel and do so with no basis to prove the point. That is slander and character assassination. I am not frustrated in the least. I have come to expect such things.

 

[Dave L]

Not in the least, Troll. You have still yet to acknowledge how you love to accuse the brethren of what would be capital offenses in ancient Israel and do so with no basis to prove the point. That is slander and character assassination. I am not frustrated in the least. I have come to expect such things.

False prophets are lucky today. Not so lucky in OT times.

 

[Copperhead]

The great tribulation was purely Jewish and happened in 70AD. Just as Jesus said it would.

Then that would mean a gap between the 69th and 70th week of Daniel that you accuse everyone else of false prophecy by promoting. Kinda hard to keep those stories straight.

 

[Dave L]

Then that would mean a gap between the 69th and 70th week of Daniel that you accuse everyone else of false prophecy by promoting. Kinda hard to keep those stories straight.

No gap. If there is, where's the scripture saying so? Jesus spoke of the great tribulation to his disciples in the second person plural. "When you see these things". You change that and make it third person plural. = "When they see these things".

 

[Copperhead]

False prophets are lucky today. Not so lucky in OT times.

Except in OT times they were not accused of being false prophets until what they said did not come to pass. You have taken it upon yourself to throw the rocks of accusation before you have an objective basis to confirm someone as a false prophet. That is sin by any standard. It is slander, defamation, and host of other things that add up to character assassination. And you base your accusations purely on how another interprets scripture, which implies that you are the sole arbiter of what scripture has to say. You have set yourself up as God. Yeah, it all comes into focus given enough time.

Divison and accusation is all you offer. Troll. WISC

 

[Dave L]

Except in OT times they were not accused of being false prophets until what they said did not come to pass. You have taken it upon yourself to throw the rocks of accusation before you have an objective basis to confirm someone as a false prophet. That is sin by any standard. It is slander, defamation, and host of other things that add up to character assassination. And you base your accusations purely on how another interprets scripture, which implies that you are the sole arbiter of what scripture has to say. You have set yourself up as God. Yeah, it all comes into focus given enough time.

Divison and accusation is all you offer. Troll.

That's your escape pod. It is all future and will never come to pass. But if scripture does not directly support you predictions, you are a false prophet and soothsayer just the same.

 

[Copperhead]

No gap. If there is, where's the scripture saying so? Jesus spoke of the great tribulation to his disciples in the second person plural. "When you see these things". You change that and make it third person plural. = "When they see these things".

69th week ended at Yeshua's being cut off, crucified. 40 years between that and 70AD. All the other 69 were contiguous. If you say there is no gap, then the 70th week would have ended in 37AD.

 

[Copperhead]

That's your escape pod. It is all future and will never come to pass. But if scripture does not directly support you predictions, you are a false prophet and soothsayer just the same.

Yeah, right. Mr. Teflon. Troll. It was the standard set up in the Torah for testing a false prophet. So you decide what scripture is valid to fit your own vain philosophy. You just keep digging that hole. I won't give you a shovel to help, but I will not stop you either.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Or into Christ who is Israel?

You mean, the Church which is?

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

The disciples (of all time) were called Christians first at Antioch. They were called the Congregation of the Lord (Jesus) in the OT.

Ignatius said the prophets were Christians.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Divison and accusation is all you offer. Troll. WISC

The troll here isn't anybody than you.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Isn't a troll something like a helium balloon a stink bomb is exploded in? We played the trick in class in primary school.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

If you say there is no gap, then the 70th week would have ended in 37AD.

Could actually precisely have been, in Acts 13 namely.

 

[Dave L]

Yeah, right. Mr. Teflon. Troll. It was the standard set up in the Torah for testing a false prophet. So you decide what scripture is valid to fit your own vain philosophy. You just keep digging that hole. I won't give you a shovel to help, but I will not stop you either.

You are a false prophet unless you can stake your claims on direct quotes from scripture.

 

[Dave L]

69th week ended at Yeshua's being cut off, crucified. 40 years between that and 70AD. All the other 69 were contiguous. If you say there is no gap, then the 70th week would have ended in 37AD.

That is about when it ended, with Stephen's death.