Well, it was almost 40 years ago, but I think I know where it is!I was just reffering to you, as your chart that you presented. not that you made it. but post you own chart, would like to seeit sloppy and all... (smile).
PICJAG.
:)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Well, it was almost 40 years ago, but I think I know where it is!I was just reffering to you, as your chart that you presented. not that you made it. but post you own chart, would like to seeit sloppy and all... (smile).
PICJAG.
first thanks for the reply, second, that's my point if the word can be translated either way why two of them is translated diferently. it seem to me, it is trying to tell something. or maybe not.
Just like Paul said in Ephesians, this same church 1:1 "Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus". why not say "unto the church in Ephesus". what I can understand if these saints that he was writting to was not originally from Ephesus, but maybe has come there. the letter was not address to all the (church?), if at the time was an organized chuch. as was with Rome, before they was organized . Romans 1:7 "To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ". but the apostle qualified who he was speaking to ... at .... or ..... in ..... Rome. see what I'm getting at. they were living in Rome at the time of the letter. another example,
1 Corinthians 1:2 "Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours". again the apostle qualify to whom he was speaking. was not this church "in" Corinth? or this Galatians 1:2 "And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia". here more than one church address using "of" in Galatia. see what I'm getting at? oh as said it could be nothing.
I have another thought on who is recieving these letters, but I'll hold it until I hear from you.
PICJAG.
I was just looking at your post. but do not God have elect not "only" in those two churches only, or are you using just these two churches to identify all the elect everywhere?
PICJAG.
Hi Davy,
Have you ever looked at them in relation to the regional history of the church in general, and Christendom?
That the issues from one lead to the next, beginning with the waning love of a post-apostolic, that is, planted church, the missionaries come in, begin a church, the excitement is there, but later a certain repetitiveness sets in (Ephesus), though as the new church grows, it comes under attack, strengthening it (Smyrna), learns how to compromise, wrong marriage (Pergamos), compromise brings false teaching (Thyatira), some division is necessary so others can know who is approved (Sardis), newly revitalized and holding on (Philadelphia), while those not in love, but lukewarm, remain (Loadicea).
Just something to consider . . .
Much love!
Peter did not yet have the power of God in him when he denied Jesus, but come that day of Pentecost [Acts 2]he received the power when he received the Spirit.
That’s what I’m trying to say He overcomes not me
Hi mjrhealth. How can water be liquid, solid, and gas and still be water?If Jesus was God, than this is an issue.
Joh_13:3 Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he was come from God, and went to God;
why would God need to Give Himself everything He already has, and
Luk 20:41 And he said unto them, How say they that Christ is David's son?
Luk 20:42 And David himself saith in the book of Psalms, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
Luk 20:43 Till I make thine enemies thy footstool.
Luk 20:44 David therefore calleth him Lord, how is he then his son?
so than how can Jesus be God when He is siting on the right Hand of God... Jesus was the first of many, there will only ever be one God.
Here's a verse that identifies Jesus Christ as God who is the One and Only Almighty.
Rev 1:8
(8) I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, says the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
PICJAG is an acronym 101G uses to sign off with on a number of forums. From memory i think it means "PEACE IN CHRIST JESUS ALMIGHTY GOD".
That's who God is, three Persons in OneI don't think so as you never form doctrine from one verse of scripture. If you take a look at Revelation 21:22 it says I did not see a temple there. The Lord God All-Powerful and the Lamb were its temple.
Note Lord God all-powerful (or almighty as in Rev 1:8) AND the lamb. The word in Greek for almighty in Rev 1:8 and almighty in Rev 21:22 is the same Greek word and in Rev 21:22 it speaks of the Lord God almighty AND the lamb meaning two different persons.
That's who God is, three Persons in One
That's who God is, three Persons in One
Col 2:8-9
(8) Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
(9) For in him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
The Lamb of God is Jesus Christ, who is One with the Father and the Holy Spirit. That makes 3 Persons in the Godhead.Please note that the verse I quoted never mentioned, three persons. It said the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb. That sounds like two people.
The Lamb of God is Jesus Christ, who is One with the Father and the Holy Spirit. That makes 3 Persons in the Godhead.
Col 2:8-9
(8) Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
(9) For in him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
I don't claim to be anything other than a born-again Spirit-filled Bible-believing follower of Christ, and here are two Scriptures that lead me to believe God is Three Persons in One.It never mentioned the Holy Spirit. It talked of the father and the son. Your take on things is conjecture from tradition that you have been subject to and you are trying to make the scripture fit your theories. A good teacher never does that.
GINOLJC, to all.Without a lot of time to research the original manuscripts and see if the words "in Rome" is actually in all of the available Greek manuscript copies of the Book of Romans or Ephesians, it seems to me that we can get lost in the silence of what is actually recorded in the various manuscripts. Scholars suggest that there were many copies of these letters made and distributed to the churches scattered around the Mediterranean Sea. Whether or not some of these copies were personalised for particular churches by the addition of place names is not now known.
I do not see the importance of what you are asking when the original Greek texts as shown in my previous post in the attachment were identical in their structure until the message to each of the churches in the various place began.
You can chase this rabbit as much as you like but it is a distraction to your original intent for this thread.
Shalom
Yes, I agree. in my experence, and what the Lord Jesus has revealed to me is that he has faithful in all churches. over the course of many years I have spoken to many who was of different denominations, friends or acquaintance of mine. and a few I was shocke as of what they told me. one friend told me, who was catholic at the time, said that she didn't believe in all of it, but here parents was catholic and she was just raised catholic, but now don't believe in most of it but still go to a catholic church, because she feels comfortable in the setting. I was surprised, but she said that she believed in the Lord Jesus and God the Father but not like most other catholic do.In Churches Jesus rebuked, some members in those He had no problem with, and told them to hold fast with what they had. So His Messages are not about whether everyone in a certain Church is in danger or not. It's about which Churches are in line with keeping His Word.
that's a good point, because he has not given us the spirit of "FEAR", but of a sound nind. and yes, he "WENT there FIRST". good point.But that's what Jesus is saying here, don't be afraid! He went there first, and is firstborn out of the dead. Of all the people who died, He was the first to come back.
Even so! Give God the glory!agree. The only reason for bringing all those passages into it was Peter’s bold “I will lay down my life for thy sake.” and Christ’s response of you can’t follow Me now but you will follow Me after.