Church should not be a dead organisation run by men, but rather a living organism, a living body with Jesus as the Head, a beating heart, the breath of the Holy Spirit in her lungs, the power and the DNA of Jesus in every part.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No worries! Just processing . . .Well yes. :) That's just where I'm taking it with her, assuming her answers were true. If they're not, then the question would be worded differently.
Again, it's a discussion, not a debate.
Well this is an interesting response because I think it encapsulates the position many may take, actually. Only I don't know that it gets us where I personally would want it to go or where I believe the Lord would necessarily want it to go. This would be a discussion in and of itself, but I take the view that He would want the modern church to be emulating the early church when it came to manifestations of supernatural gifts. I think the problem is us. And I think in order for us to do so, it will take more than being ok with it whether He does or doesn't. There is evidence from early church documents that suggests it was the corporate prayers of the saints, what James referred to as the "fervent prayer" of righteous men, that brought about manifestations of God's power in the beginning, and I think it would take that again.
That's a big discussion to get into, but I suppose I'm up for it if you are.
In His Name, as His agent. Absolutely agree!If we are in Christ we have God's authority in His Kingdom to do the things that He leads us to do so that His Glory can be seen through the things that we do in His Name.
I know a lot of people think of that being fulfilled by the transfiguration, as a glimpse ahead to His glory. I think Pentecost makes more sense. I guess I'm not dogmatic about it.Hi Jay! Thank you for responding.
I like this verse, but now let me give you what I believe the Lord was communicating. It reads literally, "Assuredly I say to you that there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God having come in power." Now, what was the last phrase referring to. I believe He was talking about Pentecost, when the Spirit of God was poured out in power, and they thereby saw the kingdom of God "come in power" upon those who were gathered together on that day. It is an easier interpretation to adopt then that He was referring to His second coming, since everyone who was alive back then died when He still hadn't returned yet.
But that's my take on that verse. I do agree that we as believers walk in Christ's authority, but even here I think we don't walk in near as much of it as we could or should.
'For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ:
for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth;
to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.'
(Rom 1:16)
Hello @Hidden In Him, ( Re. Reply #27 )
I believe that the confirmatory signs, which were Divinely worked, accompanied the ministry of the Apostles throughout the Acts period. For it was the Jews that required a sign (1 Corinthians 1:21-22), and it was the repentance of Israel that was being sought during that time. Though Paul was an Apostle to the Gentiles, and his sphere of operation was among the nations of the dispersion, it was to the synagogue of the Jew that he always went first and foremost during that period, where he reasoned from the Old Testament Scriptures concerning the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 17:2-3), with the intent that Israel should come to repentance, and take up their divinely intended role of priests of God among the nations. This did not occur at that time, as God in His foreknowledge knew, and after Israel's (temporary) departure into unbelief (Acts 28:25+), Paul was given further instruction by revelation as promised (Acts 26:16), concerning the church administration and fellowship for this present day (Ephesians 3), which is not accompanied by confirmatory signs.
I know that my understanding of this will be a disappointment to you, Hidden In Him, but this is what I believe to be true.
Thank you
In Christ Jesus
Chris
I know a lot of people think of that being fulfilled by the transfiguration, as a glimpse ahead to His glory. I think Pentecost makes more sense. I guess I'm not dogmatic about it.
Much love!
Your Thoughts: 1 Thessalonians 1:5-10
OP^
No Man was given A "Quicken" (Born Again spirit), until After Jesus returned to Heaven.
Jesus Disciples however Became "Soul Saved"...
The moment they Confessed Belief that Jesus is the Christ.
(and once gathered together , after Jesus' ascension, those gathered Disciples received the Quickening (Rebirth of their spirit).
Thereafter...a man heartfully confessing belief that Jesus IS The Christ, is immediately Soul "Saved unto God" AND "spirit quickened with Gods SEED".... no waiting period.
I believe that the confirmatory signs, which were Divinely worked, accompanied the ministry of the Apostles throughout the Acts period. For it was the Jews that required a sign (1 Corinthians 1:21-22), and it was the repentance of Israel that was being sought during that time.
Signs of an Apostle .... 2nd Corinthians 12:12 -= "in power and in the HS"
Assurance follows this proof, regarding those who have witnessed the Apostle's power.
For Jews "require a sign"....
An example can be found in Hebrews 6.. You find Paul dealing with Christ hating Hebrews, and does again in Acts 28.
In Hebrews 6, you read this verse....."and have tasted the heavenly gift".
What is that?
Thats the sign of an Apostle, given to "jews require a sign"........and He did this in front of them..... Performed this Apostolic power......to prove to them that Jesus was their Messiah, and they tasted this heavenly GIFT or "sign of an Apostle", = they witnessed the Apostle's gifts, and still rejected their Messiah.
The original Apostles manifested "gifts of the Spirit" "signs of an Apostle" on a much higher level then we can even comprehend, today.
An example, is that in Acts 13 Paul causes a male witch to become blind.
Imagine that....as that does not fit in comfortably with "love thy neighbor", and "be accepting of Homosexuality", does it?
An apostle causing you to become BLIND?
Yeah.
It happened.
Wecome to PAUL's Christianity.
He's the one that gave you "the Gospel of the GRACE of GOD".
Same fella.
See thats the thing about REAL Christianity, there is a lot more to it then just the usual babyfood stuff you hear on a Sunday morning, or normally read in a Thread.
Church should not be a dead organisation run by men, but rather a living organism, a living body with Jesus as the Head, a beating heart, the breath of the Holy Spirit in her lungs, the power and the DNA of Jesus in every part.
Whether it is or not, that's not what I'm thinking of, just whether I know or not. And I don't know, that is, whether or not God wants to use me to do things other than what He already is. If I'm teaching, does He want me to lead? If I'm leading does He want me to multiply bread?
Or does He just want me to encourage, and teach?
Casting all your cares on Him, for He cares for you!
That's my approach! Walk in faith, trust in His love, and realize that He knows all about my weakness. I don't put limits on what He will do, and I don't try to second guess. He constantly surprises me.
For myself, I see in the Scripture that there were signs and wonders being done primarily for the benefit of the Jews. That the Jews were God's intended conduit to share God's light with the Gentiles. That when the Gospel was then sent directly to the Gentiles, following Israel's continued rejection, that these signs and wonders didn't continue in the same way.
Hello Taken.
If you can, tie your post to a specific verse in our text for me. Having trouble relating exactly what you are commenting on.
God bless,
- H
Hello Taken.
If you can, tie your post to a specific verse in our text for me. Having trouble relating exactly what you are commenting on.
God bless,
- H
Hey, Behold.
Ok, I read through your post. I noticed you twice interpreted the phrase "the Jews require a sign" to be referring to the signs of an apostle. I suppose in order to prove this hypothesis, you would need to establish from the OT.
Hello @Hidden In Him,Ok, Interesting. The question here would hinge entirely on what is meant in 1 Corinthians 1:21-22:
21 For seeing that in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom knew not God, it was God's good pleasure through the foolishness of the preaching to save them that believe. 22 Seeing that Jews ask for signs, and Greeks seek after wisdom:
This would actually be a ton to unpack, but let me just give you what I take the word "signs" to be referring to here. Some take it as miracles, signs and wonders when the Pharisees asked Jesus for a "sign," but the context of that passage doesn't fit with such an interpretation. What the Jews wanted to see were signs from Heaven, i.e. divine portents that would prove He was the Messiah, such as are described as happening before the Day of the Lord (Joel 2:31).
The wording is as follows:
1 The Pharisees and Sadducees came to Jesus and tested him by asking him to show them a sign from heaven. 2 He replied, "When evening comes, you say, `It will be fair weather, for the sky is red,' 3 and in the morning, `Today it will be stormy, for the sky is red and overcast.' You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs of the times. 4 A wicked and adulterous generation looks for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah." Jesus then left them and went away. (Matthew 16:1-4).
The sign of Jonah - three days and three nights in the grave - was the only true sign they would receive of His Messiahship, because the time for the Day of the Lord would not commence during Christ's lifetime, though He was indeed their Messiah.
This then is how I interpret the 1st Corinthians passage. Paul was describing what both the Jews and Greeks were seeking most in discussing what the perfect world ruler would need to be. For the Greeks, he would have to possess incredible wisdom to rule the world wisely, so as never to lose the devotion of the people or lose power. For the Jews, all they needed to know is did He have the backing of Almighty God. If He was the Messiah, all they needed to see were supernatural signs in the heavens confirming Biblical prophecy, and they would support the man. But the point of Paul's teaching was that Christ was both. He was both the wisdom of God and the Power of God.
But again, that's quite a bit to unpack to support further.
I suppose the question would also involve looking into how much what could be classified as miraculous healings, exorcisms, etc were practiced among the Gentiles if the interpretation were that they were meant primarily only for the Jews... Granted they did indeed go to the synagogues first, and I'm not sure there is any way to prove they ever manifested miracles among a strictly Gentile audience during NT times... but I would therefore likely point to modern instances of say tongues or healings among strictly Gentile congregations in the modern era.
Are you Pentecostal, Charity? Maybe more to the point, do you believe the supernatural gifts are still operation today?
Amen, Pearl!
Since I know you and I may be on a similar page regrading Pentecostalism, let me take the opportunity to ask you something I asked Charity. I'm curious about it. Take a look at Post #29 and tell me how you would respond to that question. I'd like to know what your response would be.
Re: Matthew 16:28:27-28 & Matthew 17:1-13; Mark 9:1-10; Luke 9:27-36; 2 Peter 1:16-20Oh how the man generated headings, that have been inserted into the scriptures, have us thinking wrongly about what Jesus was saying. This is just one case. What is the context of Mark 9:1: -
Mark 8:34-9:2: - Take Up the Cross and Follow Him
(Matt 16:24-27; Luke 9:23-26)
Jesus Transfigured on the Mount34 When He had called the people to Himself, with His disciples also, He said to them, "Whoever desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me. 35 For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake and the gospel's will save it. 36 For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? 37 Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 38 For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels."
The Transfiguration of Christ
(Matt 16:28-17:13; Luke 9:27-36; 2 Peter 1:16-18)
9:1 And He said to them, "Assuredly, I say to you that there are some standing here who will not taste death till they see the kingdom of God present with power."
2 Now after six days Jesus took Peter, James, and John, and led them up on a high mountain apart by themselves; and He was transfigured before them.NKJV
Now how is the Context of the NET Bible very different: -
Mark 8:34-9:3: - Following Jesus
34 Then Jesus called the crowd, along with his disciples, and said to them, "If anyone wants to become my follower, he must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me. 35 For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and for the gospel will save it. 36 For what benefit is it for a person to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his life? 37 What can a person give in exchange for his life? 38 For if anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."
9:1 And he said to them, "I tell you the truth, there are some standing here who will not experience death before they see the kingdom of God come with power."
The Transfiguration
2 Six days later Jesus took with him Peter, James, and John and led them alone up a high mountain privately. And he was transfigured before them, 3 and his clothes became radiantly white, more so than any launderer in the world could bleach them.
(from The NET Bible®, Copyright © 1996-2006 )
Can a difference in the understanding of the two translations be seen by how the headings have been used.
A very short paraphrase of Mark 9:1 is, "There are some standing here who are not saved and they will experience the second death when they see the kingdom of God come with power at the time of judgement.
A very different conclusion. Jesus was explaining when the second death would kick in and when the time of judgement would be for those who do not full heartedly take up their cross to follow Him.
Shalom
That's a very poor paraphrase, that changes the meaning. There is no mention of whether those standing there were saved or not saved. It also doesn't say they will die when they see God's kingdom being established, nor that this will be at the time of judgement. It does say that they won't experience death before seeing, so it can't be referring to the second death because everyone of those present will have to first experience the first death before they could possibly experience the second death.9:1 And he said to them, "I tell you the truth, there are some standing here who will not experience death before they see the kingdom of God come with power."
A very short paraphrase of Mark 9:1 is, "There are some standing here who are not saved and they will experience the second death when they see the kingdom of God come with power at the time of judgement.
A very different conclusion. Jesus was explaining when the second death would kick in and when the time of judgement would be for those who do not full heartedly take up their cross to follow Him.
1. What did Paul mean by saying the word came unto the Thessalonians "in power and in the Holy Spirit"?
Also, as with the previous study, how did Paul know for a fact these things had happened among them?
That's a very poor paraphrase, that changes the meaning. Thee is no mention of whether those standing there were saved or not saved. It also doesn't say they will die when they see God's kingdom being established, nor that this will be at the time of judgement. It does say that they won't experience death before seeing, so it can't be referring to the second death because everyone of those present will have to first experience the first death before they could possibly experience the second death.
Your paraphrase doesn't make sense, because if those not worthy of eternal life will see God's kingdom come with power, and those that are worthy of eternal life will also see it, then everyone will see it! So why then would Jesus say that some of those standing there would see it before they die?
* Peter tells his readers in 2 Peter, that the coming Kingdom was a reality, and puts them in remembrance of it (1:12), and stirs them up to retain this remembrance (v.15). He then goes on to tell them that he had seen what this coming power was able to do in transfiguring this tabernacle of flesh and blood (v.16), and clothing it with majesty and honour and glory (v.17). This is the application that Peter makes of the historical fact of the transfiguration.