Who is Israel?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

logabe

Active Member
Aug 28, 2008
880
47
28
66
Hi again Logabe…I ask because it is something I was thinking about just the other day. I kind of rationalized it like this; when we are first saved we are still primarily living in the flesh but we now have the capacity to understand and learn but our heart (mind) is like a child. Our walk then, providing we put forth the effort will bring us to a point (upon death) of totally living in the spirit having fully mortified the flesh. Because of this timeline there will arrive a time when we have broken over (past the 50% mark) and we are then suddenly living more in the spirit than the flesh. It seems at that point we truly moving towards the likeness and Image of Yeshua. This perhaps is a poor analogy but this was the picture in my mind as I was asking questions of the LORD. I’m sure there will be those who strongly disagree with what I’ve said :rolleyes:

In Yeshua Messiah,

Bob

I totally agree with your analogy. Paul said, we go from glory to glory. In other words,
our spiritual eyes are being open to the things of God. We must continue to grow in
grace, not for salvation, we are already a citizen in the Kingdom, but now we want to
be a king and a priest in the Tabernacle Age. That takes going through sanctification
(Pentecost), and overcoming our trials and tribulations on a daily basis. We are being
changed by God by learning to submit to His Spirit.

Paul said, submit yourselves to God, and He will exalt you in due time. In
essence, if you become obedient to God, His Plan is to use you in leadership in the ages
to come.

What a God! What a Plan!


Logabe
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, Saint.

I think it is important to remember that the term gentile (goy or goyim) (ethnos in Greek) can apply to both non Israelites as well as Israelites; it simply means unbelievers among the nations. The term in the bible becomes confused because in most cases you have two groups; either the Jews (tribe of Judah, those remaining in Israel) or gentiles (unbelievers of the Jewish Faith). At the time of Yeshua the tribes of the Northern Kingdom were dispersed from the land and largely forgotten. It is those lost Israelites that Yeshua says He returned for and it is to them that He sent the apostles; they can be classified as gentiles.

In Yeshua Messiah,

Bob
Sorry, Bob. I should have picked up on this earlier. No, the word "goyim" in Hebrew does NOT mean unbelievers among the nations; it just means "nations." In comparison to Isra'el, it is usually considered to mean "non-Isra'el," but only when compared to "believers" could it be considered to be "non-believers." It's more of a "catch-all" word that is so nebulous as to be variable in its usage. The only way to understand what it means is by context and to see to what it is being compared.

I know this is a bit of a technicality, but when it comes to definitions and the proper understanding of those definitions in context, it becomes important. In most common situations, it's a word that can be shrugged off; however, the pickier one gets in the understanding of that context, the more importance it takes on.
 

Saint

New Member
Apr 7, 2012
243
10
0
Bible Belt
Hi Roy...here is something that I posted the other day; maybe this will set your mind at ease.

Actually there is no such original biblical term gentile. The word Gentile is not once used in any Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament. There is a very good reason for this, there is no such word in Hebrew, nor any word that corresponds to it. Everywhere you find the word Gentile used in the Old Testament, it is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word goi, which means nation, the plural form of it is goyim. In all cases these words mean nation or nations.

Now let’s look at the New Testament and the Greek translation. Here the word mistranslated Gentile, is nearly always the Greek word ethnos. This means just exactly nation, the same as the Hebrew word goy.

Paul was sent to the nations to preach the gospel and if you study the issue in almost all cases he was preaching to the the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel as were the other apostles of whom Yeshua sent only to the Lost Tribes of Israel.

What does this word Gentile mean and from what is it derived? It is derived from the Latin word gentilis, which means one who is not a Roman citizen. If you use the word correctly, then you would have to say that Yahshua and His twelve disciples wereall Gentiles. None of them were Roman citizens by birth.

Wherever you see the word Gentile in the Bible, remember the correct word is nation, race or people. In many cases it is used when speaking of Israel nations or the Israelite race.

It all becomes a little confused because Yeahua sent the Apostles to the Lost Tribes scattered in the nations!


In Yeshua Messiah,

Bob
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, JLB.

The Word BECAME flesh. God became flesh.

He was made a little lower than the angels. [temporarily]

I agree; however, you are ASSUMING that when "God became flesh" He remained God rather than the "Son of God." I noticed that YOU stuck in the word "temporarily." How do we know it was temporary? I'd like you to consider a comparison:

Do the Catholics believe in the divinity of Mary? Yes, many of them do. Why? Because in their words, she is the "mother of God!" Therefore, they conclude that she, too, must have divinity!

Some Protestants at least will make the distinction that Mary was only the mother of the BODY of Jesus Christ, not the mother of God!

Could it be that we have given Yeshua` the Messiah (Jesus the Christ) the same kind of divinity? Because in our words, He is the "Son of God," do we therefore conclude that He, too, must have divinity?

Should we Protestants make the distinction that Yeshua is the Word of God taking on a BODY, and not God Himself?

I think that makes better sense, because if Yeshua` the Messiah is LOCALIZED to a body, how can He be any longer omnipresent? If He said that there was something He didn't know in Mark 13:32, how can He be any longer omniscient? Even if He becomes omnipresent and omniscient in the future, there was a POINT in His existence when He was neither! He is and will always be NO LONGER THE SAME as God, His Father!

See, I think Revelation 21:23 is an example of the difference that now exists:

Rev. 21:23
23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.
KJV


In Greek, this is...

Rev. 21:23
23 Kai hee polis ou chreian echei tou heeliou oude tees seleenees hina fainoosin autee, hee gar doxa tou Theou efootisen auteen, kai ho luchnos authess to Arnion.
The Greek New Testament

23 Kai = 23 And
hee = the
polis = city
ou = no/not
chreian = employment
echei = holds
tou = of-the
heeliou = sun
oude = neither (not-but)
tees = of-the
seleenees = moon
hina = in-order-that/so-that
fainoosin = to-lighten
autee, = it,
hee = the
gar = for
doxa = glory/brightness
tou = of-the
Theou = God
efootisen = did-lighten
auteen, = it,
kai = and
ho = the
luchnos = lamp
autees = of-it
to = the
Arnion. = Lamb.

23 And the city no/not employment holds of-the sun neither (not-but) of-the moon in-order-that/so-that to-lighten it, the for glory/brightness of-the God did-lighten it, and the lamp of-it the Lamb.

God gives it His glory to enlighten the city, but Yeshua` - the Lamb - is the LAMP! God gives the light, but the Lamb is the lightBULB! And THAT, I believe, is the difference between God and the Son of God.

(Isn't it interesting how that topics depend upon one another?)
 

Erudite Celt

New Member
Jun 20, 2012
31
0
0
ULSTER
Israel is spoken of in the scriptures as a historical nation; an allegorical nation; and a symbolic nation. There are members of this forum who promote each of these different versions of Israel.
  1. Semitic Israel is always literal Israel (promises are still given to Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews now in Palestine)
  2. The Church is now the allegorical Israel (promises were passed onto the church)
  3. Israel is now the migrated 10 tribes who are the white nations of Europe (promises were passed onto the white European nations)
  4. Israel is literal, allegorical and symbolic (some promises were passed onto the church and some still apply to Israel)
As the subject of Israel seems to spill out onto many different threads; here is an opportunity for advocates of each version of Israel to explain their views to other members. Please try to avoid the football barracking mentality (yelling and screaming from the sidelines). Give the reasons why you believe your doctrine with as much scriptural support as possible. Try not to SPAM the thread with extremely long chapters from other people’s research. I will not call anyone’s views heresy; even though I have felt this way about some modern dogmas. Some others also feel that my views are heresy.

Steve

The land of Israel was promised to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. To this end it should be pointed out that the Ashkenazi are 10-11th century Khazar converts to Judaism. At no time in their history did any of their ancestors live in Israel. The Sephardic Jews however can claim to be direct descendants of the three patriarchal fathers.
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Hi Erudite Celt, welcome :)

The land of Israel was promised to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. To this end it should be pointed out that the Ashkenazi are 10-11th century Khazar converts to Judaism. At no time in their history did any of their ancestors live in Israel. The Sephardic Jews however can claim to be direct descendants of the three patriarchal fathers.

I'm glad someone has said this, but does it make any difference to the Biblical definition of Israel, since from the Exodus circumcision acted as the acknowledgement of a non-Israelite's acceptace into Israel?

No matter what other nationality (almost), and especially wives, (one flesh with their husbands) were counted 'in' when their husband was circumcised.

Until recently, I had never noticed 'Simon the Canaanite' (Matt 10:4) amongst the twelve disciples. This was not a problem to a natural Israelite, as the Law commanded them to treat strangers respectfully, since they had been strangers in Egypt.
 

Erudite Celt

New Member
Jun 20, 2012
31
0
0
ULSTER
Hi Erudite Celt, welcome :)



I'm glad someone has said this, but does it make any difference to the Biblical definition of Israel, since from the Exodus circumcision acted as the acknowledgement of a non-Israelite's acceptace into Israel?

No matter what other nationality (almost), and especially wives, (one flesh with their husbands) were counted 'in' when their husband was circumcised.

Until recently, I had never noticed 'Simon the Canaanite' (Matt 10:4) amongst the twelve disciples. This was not a problem to a natural Israelite, as the Law commanded them to treat strangers respectfully, since they had been strangers in Egypt.
Hi dragonfly, Simon the zealot was still descended from the bloodline of Abraham even though he was a Canaanite. Paul was a Roman but he was not Italian! The Jews ( from Isaac and Jacob ) are promised Israel. One of the main arguments of Zionism ( an Ashkenazi concept ) is that they are returning to the land of their forefathers, how any blond haired, blue eyed European can claim that he's going home to the middle east, the home of his ancestors is beyond me. Jewishness is not just a religious profile it is also a racial one. The Sephardic Jews are genuine. Many of the others I'm not to sure.



REV2:9
I know your afflictions and your poverty--yet you are rich! I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.


REV3:9
I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars--I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.
Will this be the Ashkenazi's acknowledging the Sephardic and Messianic Christians?
 

Saint

New Member
Apr 7, 2012
243
10
0
Bible Belt
Hi dragonfly, Simon the zealot was still descended from the bloodline of Abraham even though he was a Canaanite. Paul was a Roman but he was not Italian! The Jews ( from Isaac and Jacob ) are promised Israel. One of the main arguments of Zionism ( an Ashkenazi concept ) is that they are returning to the land of their forefathers, how any blond haired, blue eyed European can claim that he's going home to the middle east, the home of his ancestors is beyond me. Jewishness is not just a religious profile it is also a racial one. The Sephardic Jews are genuine. Many of the others I'm not to sure.

From Judaism 101 web site...

Ashkenazic Jews are the Jews of France, Germany, and Eastern Europe and their descendants. The adjective "Ashkenazic" and corresponding nouns, Ashkenazi (singular) and Ashkenazim (plural) are derived from the Hebrew word "Ashkenaz," which is used to refer to Germany. Most American Jews today are Ashkenazim, descended from Jews who emigrated from Germany and Eastern Europe from the mid 1800s to the early 1900s. The pages in this site are written from the Ashkenazic Jewish perspective.

Hi Erudite Celt; after interbreeding for the past 2700 years don't you think your statement might be a little strong? Seems to me that God will choose and call whomever He desires. I doubt that there are many pure blooded descendents of Isaac in the world today but there are a great multitude of descendents.

In Yeshua Messiah,

Bob
 

Erudite Celt

New Member
Jun 20, 2012
31
0
0
ULSTER
From Judaism 101 web site...



Hi Erudite Celt; after interbreeding for the past 2700 years don't you think your statement might be a little strong? Seems to me that God will choose and call whomever He desires. I doubt that there are many pure blooded descendents of Isaac in the world today but there are a great multitude of descendents.

In Yeshua Messiah,

Bob
As I am sure you are aware Bob ( nice to meet you ) non secular Jews whether Ashkenazi or Sephardic rarely marry outside of their people groups. Genome studies prove that the Ashkenazi have an extremely tight paternal gene pool group , originating in Eastern Europe not the middle or even near east. The Sephardic Jews share over 93%!!! of Mitochondrial DNA with one another and 98% of Y-chromosome. The male Y-chromosome is also common to males in Arab nations and others like Iran and Afghanistan to name but a few.

Gen 35:11 And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of you, and kings shall spring forth from you;
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Hi Erudite Celt,

Simon the zealot was still descended from the bloodline of Abraham even though he was a Canaanite. Paul was a Roman but he was not Italian! The Jews ( from Isaac and Jacob ) are promised Israel. One of the main arguments of Zionism ( an Ashkenazi concept ) is that they are returning to the land of their forefathers, how any blond haired, blue eyed European can claim that he's going home to the middle east, the home of his ancestors is beyond me. Jewishness is not just a religious profile it is also a racial one. The Sephardic Jews are genuine. Many of the others I'm not to sure.



REV2:9
I know your afflictions and your poverty--yet you are rich! I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.


REV3:9
I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars--I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.
Will this be the Ashkenazi's acknowledging the Sephardic and Messianic Christians


As 'Simon the zealot' is not named as such in the KJV (I haven't checked other versions), I'll stick with Simon the Canaanite. He could not have been descended from Abraham because Abram was descended from Shem, and Canaan was Ham's son. And this is exactly the point I'm making - that God wants all men to be saved; those who were willing to come to Him, became part of 'the commonwealth of Israel', as Paul calls it in Ephesians 2. Once a man was circumcised and keeping the law, he was counted fully as an Israelite at heart, and the important thing is that God treated him as that.

When God told Abraham he would be a 'father of many nations', he was as yet uncircumcised. Isn't this the fulcrum of Paul's argument in Romans 4 and Galatians 3? The 'blessing' is about coming into God's family, and this is why Paul mentions the unprofitability of geneaological debates. He knows it has nothing to do with the 'inheritance' of believers - from God's point of view. God is not reckoning men any more by who there father was, once they are in Him.

The synagogue of Satan is about profound opposition to Jesus Christ, camouflaged as respectable religion.

how any blond haired, blue eyed European can claim that he's going home to the middle east, the home of his ancestors is beyond me.

Well, the recessive genes are responsible. There is blond tribe on the border of Pakistan, called the Patans. And if we believe that Denmark is from Dan, I can see no reason why, if there is a predominance of recessive genes in the population at any time, they may not be descended from Jacob. God has never prevented Israelite men from marrying outside Israel, although there are a number of accounts in the BIble where the importance of the ethnic origin of the wife is undeniable - Sarah, Rebekkah, Rachel, Hannah, Elisabeth and Mary being obvious ones. A Jamaican colleague (some years ago, now) told me that ethnic appearance is no guarantee of parental identity. There can be a family with two blond blue-eyed children, and two which look African, from the same mother and father, such is the genetic mix at work there. God looks on the heart every time.

Today's arguments about 'the land' baffle me, because there is nowhere in scripture that unbelievers will inherit it. Being of Israel or Judah, as Jacob's sons latterly divided, but not of the faith of Jesus Christ, will only invite God's destruction one day. All the promises are to those who turn from their wicked ways to walk humbly with God on His terms. Since the cross, that means recognising their Messiah seated in glory on the Father's right hand.

This is the whole point of Paul's thesis about 'one new man' in Christ, in Ephesians 2, where again, this time through the New Covenant, Gentiles are able to be admitted to 'the commonwealth of Israel'. Since he was speaking during a time of total occupation and control of 'the land' by the Roman Empire, he was definitely not referring to 'the land'. Israel has always been about a people in relationship with God - like their father 'Israel' so named because of his change of heart from Jacob. The sons of Jacob all need the same spiritual operation upon their hearts, to become 'Israel' as God sees them.
 

Erudite Celt

New Member
Jun 20, 2012
31
0
0
ULSTER
Hi Bob, my point has nothing to do with who will or who wont be saved, as you say god wants all men to be saved so amen to that. The point I am pushing is the erroneous claim of Ashkenazim. They claim to be the descendants of Jacob, the blood line of Jacob; this is untrue! ​ Language is a good indicator of origins within people groups Their ancient language "Yiddish" has no Hebraic or Aramaic roots whatsoever. It is pure High German, a Indo-European language. They adopted the Hebraic alphabet only as a script. a bit like typing English words in wing-dings!
I'm not sure if you saw or heard Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to the UN? It was very impressive and I agreed with every point he made as I do support a Jewish Israel. He did however tell a "porky" . At one point during his brilliant speech he mentioned that the seal of an official seal dating to the time of David was found during archaeological excavations. He said " AND THAT SEAL BORE THE NAME NETANYAHU, MY FAMILY ANCESTOR "!!! The deception of this statement is extreme as the name of Netanyahu has only been born by his family for sixty years not two and a half thousand! Benjamin Netanyahu was born with the surname Mileikowsky ! ​ Why the need for deception? why claim to be the decendant of a temple priest? The bible clearly warns both Jew and Gentile about such usurpers and that they would control Israel.!
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Hi Erudite Celt,

Some years ago I read the first Bible Code book which was written. Not sure what to make of it to this day, but not willing to say it was all wrong either. I'm sure I recall something about Benjamin Netanyahu's name, there. And I wonder whether there is something in the translation, or, middle names, which enables him to make this claim. I don't know, though.
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, Erudite Celt.

Hi Bob, my point has nothing to do with who will or who wont be saved, as you say god wants all men to be saved so amen to that. The point I am pushing is the erroneous claim of Ashkenazim. They claim to be the descendants of Jacob, the blood line of Jacob; this is untrue! ​ Language is a good indicator of origins within people groups Their ancient language "Yiddish" has no Hebraic or Aramaic roots whatsoever. It is pure High German, a Indo-European language. They adopted the Hebraic alphabet only as a script. a bit like typing English words in wing-dings!
I'm not sure if you saw or heard Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to the UN? It was very impressive and I agreed with every point he made as I do support a Jewish Israel. He did however tell a "porky" . At one point during his brilliant speech he mentioned that the seal of an official seal dating to the time of David was found during archaeological excavations. He said " AND THAT SEAL BORE THE NAME NETANYAHU, MY FAMILY ANCESTOR "!!! The deception of this statement is extreme as the name of Netanyahu has only been born by his family for sixty years not two and a half thousand! Benjamin Netanyahu was born with the surname Mileikowsky ! ​ Why the need for deception? why claim to be the decendant of a temple priest? The bible clearly warns both Jew and Gentile about such usurpers and that they would control Israel.!

Who's to say that "Mileikowsky" isn't Polish for "God's gift?" I don't know Polish; do you? I find it interesting that the ones who bring this up as a "deception" are the Palestinians and Palestinian sympathizers! The Arab world (given over to Islam and the worship of the false god, Allah, and his prophet, Muhammed) are going to make the claims that Isra'el was never IN the Land, or shared it with other nations, or were European Jews who became Jews as proselytes, etc. ANYTHING to discredit God's Word when HE said He gave the Land to Isra'el and his descendants FOREVER!

I would think the man knows a little more about his own ancestry than any of his detractors. Besides, the name could have come through his mother, since it is the maternal line that was consulted to determine a person's Jewish heritage.

You don't need to listen to the arguments by Palestinians whose ancestors INVADED the Land from the neighboring countries in an attempt to squat there before the Jews could gain a foothold! Even should one take the history back to the early Arab chieftains after the Romans took Isra'el captive and scattered them among the nations, none of their arguments can stand up to this:

Exodus 19:3-8
3 And Moses went up unto God, and the Lord called unto him out of the mountain, saying, Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel;
4 Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself.
5 Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine:
6 And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.
7 And Moses came and called for the elders of the people, and laid before their faces all these words which the Lord commanded him.
8 And all the people answered together, and said, All that the Lord hath spoken we will do. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the Lord.
KJV


Leviticus 25:18-28
18 Wherefore ye shall do my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them; and ye shall dwell in the land in safety.
19 And the land shall yield her fruit, and he shall eat your fill, and dwell therein in safety.
20 And if ye shall say, What shall we eat the seventh year? behold, we shall not sow, nor gather in our increase:
21 Then I will command my blessing upon you in the sixth year, and it shall bring forth fruit for three years.
22 And ye shall sow the eighth year, and eat yet of old fruit until the ninth year; until her fruits come in ye shall eat of the old store.
23 The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me.
24 And in all the land of your possession ye shall grant a redemption for the land.
25 If thy brother be waxen poor, and hath sold away some of his possession, and if any of his kin come to redeem it, then shall he redeem that which his brother sold.
26 And if the man have none to redeem it, and himself be able to redeem it;
27 Then let him count the years of the sale thereof, and restore the overplus unto the man to whom he sold it; that he may return unto his possession.
28 But if he be not able to restore it to him, then that which is sold shall remain in the hand of him that hath bought it until the year of jubilee: and in the jubilee it shall go out, and he shall return unto his possession.
KJV


Numbers 8:14-21
14 Thus shalt thou separate the Levites from among the children of Israel: and the Levites shall be mine.
15 And after that shall the Levites go in to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation: and thou shalt cleanse them, and offer them for an offering.
16 For they are wholly given unto me from among the children of Israel; instead of such as open every womb, even instead of the firstborn of all the children of Israel, have I taken them unto me.
17 For all the firstborn of the children of Israel are mine, both man and beast: on the day that I smote every firstborn in the land of Egypt I sanctified them for myself.
18 And I have taken the Levites for all the firstborn of the children of Israel.
19 And I have given the Levites as a gift to Aaron and to his sons from among the children of Israel, to do the service of the children of Israel in the tabernacle of the congregation, and to make an atonement for the children of Israel: that there be no plague among the children of Israel, when the children of Israel come nigh unto the sanctuary.
20 And Moses, and Aaron, and all the congregation of the children of Israel, did to the Levites according unto all that the Lord commanded Moses concerning the Levites, so did the children of Israel unto them.
21 And the Levites were purified, and they washed their clothes; and Aaron offered them as an offering before the Lord; and Aaron made an atonement for them to cleanse them.
KJV


Isaiah 19:23-25
23 In that day shall there be a highway out of Egypt to Assyria, and the Assyrian shall come into Egypt, and the Egyptian into Assyria, and the Egyptians shall serve with the Assyrians.
24 In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and with Assyria, even a blessing in the midst of the land:
25 Whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, saying, Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel mine inheritance.
KJV


Isaiah 43:1
43 But now thus saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed thee, O Israel, Fear not: for I have redeemed thee, I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine.
KJV


Ezekiel 20:39-44
39 As for you, O house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God; Go ye, serve ye every one his idols, and hereafter also, if ye will not hearken unto me: but pollute ye my holy name no more with your gifts, and with your idols.
40 For in mine holy mountain, in the mountain of the height of Israel, saith the Lord God, there shall all the house of Israel, all of them in the land, serve me: there will I accept them, and there will I require your offerings, and the firstfruits of your oblations, with all your holy things.
41 I will accept you with your sweet savour, when I bring you out from the people, and gather you out of the countries wherein ye have been scattered; and I will be sanctified in you before the heathen.
42 And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I shall bring you into the land of Israel, into the country for the which I lifted up mine hand to give it to your fathers.
43 And there shall ye remember your ways, and all your doings, wherein ye have been defiled; and ye shall lothe yourselves in your own sight for all your evils that ye have committed.
44 And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I have wrought with you for my name's sake, not according to your wicked ways, nor according to your corrupt doings, O ye house of Israel, saith the Lord God.
KJV


Who will be STUPID enough to argue with YHWH?!
 

Saint

New Member
Apr 7, 2012
243
10
0
Bible Belt
Hummm....can anyone on this board give me any scripture that proves that the New Covenant was extended to anyone other than the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Before you answer study hard at the true meaning of the term "gentile"! It does not mean what you think it means; it does not mean a non-Hebrew believer as most of you assume; the translation in Young's gives the true meaning:

Wherefore, remember, that ye were once the nations in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that called Circumcision in the flesh made by hands,
(Eph 2:11 YLT)

As opposed to the KJV:

Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
(Eph 2:11 KJV)

If you look into the subject I think you will find in almost every case you will find that the term reflects descendents of the Lost tribes of Jacob who have been dispersed into the nations!

Remember Yeshua said that He was sent only for the Lost Sheep of Israel; this is where He sent the apostles, as well it was to the eth'-nos (nations)(gôy gôy in Hebrew) that Paul was sent.

But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
(Mat 15:24 KJV)

These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
(Mat 10:5-6 KJV)

In Yeshua Messiah,

Bob
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Hummm....can anyone on this board give me any scripture that proves that the New Covenant was extended to anyone other than the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Before you answer study hard at the true meaning of the term "gentile"! It does not mean what you think it means; it does not mean a non-Hebrew believer as most of you assume; the translation in Young's gives the true meaning:

Wherefore, remember, that ye were once the nations in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that called Circumcision in the flesh made by hands,
(Eph 2:11 YLT)

As opposed to the KJV:

Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
(Eph 2:11 KJV)

If you look into the subject I think you will find in almost every case you will find that the term reflects descendents of the Lost tribes of Jacob who have been dispersed into the nations!

Remember Yeshua said that He was sent only for the Lost Sheep of Israel; this is where He sent the apostles, as well it was to the eth'-nos (nations)(gôy gôy in Hebrew) that Paul was sent.

But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
(Mat 15:24 KJV)

These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
(Mat 10:5-6 KJV)

Hi Saint,

Look at the last verse you've quoted. If Jesus was interested in extracting only the 'lost sheep of the house of Israel' from amongst the nations, why did He instruct His disciples not to preach to them? Hunh?

'If you look into the subject I think you will find in almost every case you will find that the term reflects descendents of the Lost tribes of Jacob who have been dispersed into the nations!'

Well of course the lost tribes are dispersed into the nations, and God wants to save them. (John 3:16) Doesn't your own BIble reading cause you to question this doctrine?

You asked:

'Hummm....can anyone on this board give me any scripture that proves that the New Covenant was extended to anyone other than the House of Israel and the House of Judah?'

Answer: Many. It's unsustainable, scripturally.

'Before you answer study hard at the true meaning of the term "gentile"! It does not mean what you think it means; it does not mean a non-Hebrew believer as most of you assume; the translation in Young's gives the true meaning:

Wherefore, remember, that ye were once the nations in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that called Circumcision in the flesh made by hands,
(Eph 2:11 YLT)'

Yes, this is always what 'gentiles' meant. I've never heard it preached otherwise. You do realise, don't you, that Paul was writing to a church (the church at Ephesus) which had both Jewish and gentile Christians? The whole of chapter 2 could have followed on Romans 2:1, just as easily as in his letter to the Ephesians. I don't plan to write a long post here, but let me give you a couple of pointers. First, that reference to 'the flesh' is significant, because the children of 'Israel' are 'sons of Jacob' 'in the flesh'. Secondly, Paul does not believe 'gentiles' are 'lost sheep of the house of Israel'. How do I know? The very next verse from the one with the 'definition' you gave; he is explaining -

Ephesians 2:12 That at that time ye [gentiles] were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

To understand 'the covenants of promise', you do need to read a lot of Bible, but Paul refers to them specifically in the context of God's word to Israelites, in Romans 9:4. Before I quote that, I want you to see something - that even Israelites had to be adopted into God's family through circumcision of the heart and baptism in the Holy Spirit. Their nationality doesn't save them per se but God had given them the role of receiving and keeping His word to the whole world. This special relationship with God meant that He expected them to obey Him and be an example to 'the nations'. When they didn't obey Him, His punishments of them were also an example to 'the nations', of how He corrected them.

Back to Romans 9:4 Who are Israelites; to whom [pertaineth] the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service [of God], and the promises;

All I'm showing here, is, that if Paul had believed he was speaking to 'the lost sheep of the house of Israel', he would not have stated they had been by their (first) birth (flesh) excluded, as 'strangers from the covenants of promise'.

How do I know this? Because there is more than one verse in the Bible which tells that one of the reasons God dispersed Israel into the nations, was to make His name known there. He knew that they knew what had been promised to them at Sinai, and within the law they were supposed to teach their children everything and keep passing it down the generations. Circumcision began with Abraham only after he had been accounted righteous for believing God's word to him. If you can get your head round the first six chapters of Romans, you'll see there was a clear difference between those who had God's word with its incumbent expectations, and those who had no knowledge of it, and how Paul shows why it is that 'gentiles' are invited to believe in Jesus Christ as well as those descended from Jacob.


To look at this question a different way completely, here is an extract from a document on baptism. That sounds boring, I know, and it is littered with Hebrew words, to some of which I've added the English in square brackets, but, it shows how 'Jews' regarded 'the nations', who had always been able to join Judaism through a series of rituals set out in the law. (This is another reason it it false to try to excude other 'gentiles' from the gospel. 'Israel', was already full of 'proselytes' to their faith, whom God now counted as members of 'the commonwealth of Israel'. (Ephesians 2:12))

The author of the clip I'm going to post below, (Jewish by virtue of a Jewish mother), has translated the scriptures from the original languages for Orthodox Jews of our day. I point out his ethnicity so that you understand - if anyone could be biased in favour of the house of Israel and the house of Judah, such an one could be. His first book was called How to go a Messianic Synagogue. In the section before this, he goes over the prophecies which justified John the Baptist's ministry:

'Zechariah too saw this final time of national repentance: There shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and uncleanness" (Zechariah 13:1). Proselyte tevilah [ritual washing] immersion symbolically washed the uncleanness from the heathen on entering Judaism. Thus non-Jews were grafted on to the people of G-d by a water immersion which gave them ceremonial purity.

The Jewish prophet Yochanan (John) HaMahtbeel (the Tevilah Immersionist) called on all Israel to likewise confess sinful uncleanness and take a mikveh ritual bath "as a token of their teshuva" (Mark 1:4) and resolve to keep themselves holy as they awaited the coming Moshiach. Then as the last days began to approach, the Jewish prophet Yochanan announced that the Moshiach was on his way to pour out the Ruach Hakodesh [Holy Spirit] on some and the fire of Gehinnom on others. Therefore, all must heed the Word of G-d, turn from their own ways, look to G-d and his Moshiach for mercy and deliverance from judgment, be cleansed with clean water, and be saved from G-d's burning wrath (see Mark 1:4, Matthew 3:7, Luke 3:9).

Sensing by the Ruach Hakodesh that the Moshiach's presence on the earth was very near and that the need for preparing the Jewish people to meet their G-d had reached the crisis point, Yochanan HaMahtbeel called upon all G-d's people to seek the forgiveness of Hashem [a name Jews feel comfortable to call God] by submitting to a purifying tevilah. For this great Jewish prophet saw that the coming Moshiach would judge the wicked who had not turned from the "Egyptian" evils of this world by taking a "Red Sea" immersion of separation and repentance in the Jordan River.

G-d gave Yochanan the foresight to see that those who did turn to G-d would be given the Ruach Hakodesh by the Coming One, the Moshiach. Later Yochanan must have had inspired intimations of how G-d would save his people and the kapparah [expiation (of sin)] Moshiach would bring. Yochanan pointed to Moshiach Adoneinu and said, "Look, there is the Lamb of G-d; it is he who takes away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I spoke when I said, `After me a man is coming whose status is higher than mine; for before I was born, he already existed.’ I myself did not know who he was; but the very reason why I came, immersing in water, was that he might be revealed to Israel" (Yochanan 1:29-31).

However, the tevilah immersion of Yochanan went beyond proselyte immersion in several ways. It was directed toward his fellow Jews. It was a collective act of repentance and included the whole nation. It had a "last-chance" ethical and spiritual significance that went far beyond the mere ceremonial cleansing of proselyte tevilah immersion. Yochanan asserted that through his water ordeal the remnant of the true Israel of G-d was being called out from all the spiritually dead who refused to prepare themselves by tevilah immersion for the coming of the Moshiach. Therefore, all strata of Israel's society responded to the immersion of Yochanan.

What was unique about Yochanan was that he saw by inspiration from the G-d of Israel that, in view of the coming of the Holy One, the Moshiach, Jews were just as unprepared and sinfully unclean and in need of ultimate kapparah (Yochanan 1:29) as were heathen proselytes, and must therefore prepare themselves by the same act of repentance - submitting, to a tevilah immersion for the uncleanness of sins. Yochanan preached, "Do not presume to say to yourselves, 'We have the yichus (proud lineage), we have the zechut Avot (merit of the Fathers) of Avraham Avinu (our father Abraham).' For I say to you that Hashem is able to raise up from these avanim (stones) banim (sons) of Avraham" (OJBC version, Matthew 3:9). Yochanan knew that the essential thing for his fellow Jews was that they humble themselves, turn from prideful wickedness and prepare to adhere to the Moshiach, through whom they would escape judgment and receive the all-important gift of Hashem, the Ruach Hakodesh. Therefore, he saw that the whole nation of Israel must turn to G-d with the humility of a sinful non-Jew submitting to a mikveh of repentance for the sins of his unholy former life.

In pointing toward the Seh haElohim (the Lamb of G-d, Isaiah 53:7, Genesis 22:8), Yochanan pointed toward a new meaning for the tevilah immersion as the standard means of making proselytes to Judaism. This new meaning would include a perfect blood sacrifice for sin, an eternal kapparah for all who would receive the Ruach Hakodesh and thus be circumcised as spiritual bnei Avraham through immersion in the name of the G-d of Israel. The tevilah immersion toward which Yochanan was pointing was the immersion of Moshiach Adoneinu, experienced by Moshiach himself and then by him commanded for all peoples of the world.'


Hopefully, when you read Romans 4, you will go back to Genesis 10 and 11 to see who else was a 'gentile' at the time Abram was called by God. Also, these two verses link Adam and Eve to the cross. (There are more, too.)

Genesis 3:14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent... 15:And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

John 3:14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: 15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
 

Episkopos

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2011
12,880
19,425
113
65
Montreal
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Israel is a man (Jacob) who had a personal encounter with God. He found what he was seeking for. So everyone who finds God (or vice versa) in a personal encounter is of Israel.
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Israel is a man (Jacob) who had a personal encounter with God. He found what he was seeking for. So everyone who finds God (or vice versa) in a personal encounter is of Israel.

Very well put. Amen!! :)
 

Axehead

New Member
May 9, 2012
2,222
205
0
Israel is a man (Jacob) who had a personal encounter with God. He found what he was seeking for. So everyone who finds God (or vice versa) in a personal encounter is of Israel.

Simple, yet profound. You could say it's profoundly simple.

Axehead
 

Erudite Celt

New Member
Jun 20, 2012
31
0
0
ULSTER
Shalom, Erudite Celt.



Who's to say that "Mileikowsky" isn't Polish for "God's gift?" I don't know Polish; do you? I find it interesting that the ones who bring this up as a "deception" are the Palestinians and Palestinian sympathizers! The Arab world (given over to Islam and the worship of the false god, Allah, and his prophet, Muhammed) are going to make the claims that Isra'el was never IN the Land, or shared it with other nations, or were European Jews who became Jews as proselytes, etc. ANYTHING to discredit God's Word when HE said He gave the Land to Isra'el and his descendants FOREVER!

I would think the man knows a little more about his own ancestry than any of his detractors. Besides, the name could have come through his mother, since it is the maternal line that was consulted to determine a person's Jewish heritage.

You don't need to listen to the arguments by Palestinians whose ancestors INVADED the Land from the neighboring countries in an attempt to squat there before the Jews could gain a foothold! Even should one take the history back to the early Arab chieftains after the Romans took Isra'el captive and scattered them among the nations, none of their arguments can stand up to this:

Exodus 19:3-8
3 And Moses went up unto God, and the Lord called unto him out of the mountain, saying, Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel;
4 Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself.
5 Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine:
6 And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.
7 And Moses came and called for the elders of the people, and laid before their faces all these words which the Lord commanded him.
8 And all the people answered together, and said, All that the Lord hath spoken we will do. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the Lord.
KJV


Leviticus 25:18-28
18 Wherefore ye shall do my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them; and ye shall dwell in the land in safety.
19 And the land shall yield her fruit, and he shall eat your fill, and dwell therein in safety.
20 And if ye shall say, What shall we eat the seventh year? behold, we shall not sow, nor gather in our increase:
21 Then I will command my blessing upon you in the sixth year, and it shall bring forth fruit for three years.
22 And ye shall sow the eighth year, and eat yet of old fruit until the ninth year; until her fruits come in ye shall eat of the old store.
23 The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me.
24 And in all the land of your possession ye shall grant a redemption for the land.
25 If thy brother be waxen poor, and hath sold away some of his possession, and if any of his kin come to redeem it, then shall he redeem that which his brother sold.
26 And if the man have none to redeem it, and himself be able to redeem it;
27 Then let him count the years of the sale thereof, and restore the overplus unto the man to whom he sold it; that he may return unto his possession.
28 But if he be not able to restore it to him, then that which is sold shall remain in the hand of him that hath bought it until the year of jubilee: and in the jubilee it shall go out, and he shall return unto his possession.
KJV


Numbers 8:14-21
14 Thus shalt thou separate the Levites from among the children of Israel: and the Levites shall be mine.
15 And after that shall the Levites go in to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation: and thou shalt cleanse them, and offer them for an offering.
16 For they are wholly given unto me from among the children of Israel; instead of such as open every womb, even instead of the firstborn of all the children of Israel, have I taken them unto me.
17 For all the firstborn of the children of Israel are mine, both man and beast: on the day that I smote every firstborn in the land of Egypt I sanctified them for myself.
18 And I have taken the Levites for all the firstborn of the children of Israel.
19 And I have given the Levites as a gift to Aaron and to his sons from among the children of Israel, to do the service of the children of Israel in the tabernacle of the congregation, and to make an atonement for the children of Israel: that there be no plague among the children of Israel, when the children of Israel come nigh unto the sanctuary.
20 And Moses, and Aaron, and all the congregation of the children of Israel, did to the Levites according unto all that the Lord commanded Moses concerning the Levites, so did the children of Israel unto them.
21 And the Levites were purified, and they washed their clothes; and Aaron offered them as an offering before the Lord; and Aaron made an atonement for them to cleanse them.
KJV


Isaiah 19:23-25
23 In that day shall there be a highway out of Egypt to Assyria, and the Assyrian shall come into Egypt, and the Egyptian into Assyria, and the Egyptians shall serve with the Assyrians.
24 In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and with Assyria, even a blessing in the midst of the land:
25 Whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, saying, Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel mine inheritance.
KJV


Isaiah 43:1
43 But now thus saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed thee, O Israel, Fear not: for I have redeemed thee, I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine.
KJV


Ezekiel 20:39-44
39 As for you, O house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God; Go ye, serve ye every one his idols, and hereafter also, if ye will not hearken unto me: but pollute ye my holy name no more with your gifts, and with your idols.
40 For in mine holy mountain, in the mountain of the height of Israel, saith the Lord God, there shall all the house of Israel, all of them in the land, serve me: there will I accept them, and there will I require your offerings, and the firstfruits of your oblations, with all your holy things.
41 I will accept you with your sweet savour, when I bring you out from the people, and gather you out of the countries wherein ye have been scattered; and I will be sanctified in you before the heathen.
42 And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I shall bring you into the land of Israel, into the country for the which I lifted up mine hand to give it to your fathers.
43 And there shall ye remember your ways, and all your doings, wherein ye have been defiled; and ye shall lothe yourselves in your own sight for all your evils that ye have committed.
44 And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I have wrought with you for my name's sake, not according to your wicked ways, nor according to your corrupt doings, O ye house of Israel, saith the Lord God.
KJV


Who will be STUPID enough to argue with YHWH?!
Your first point "Mileikowsky" means Archer. Your second point you called me an Palestinian sympathizer! You must have missed were I wrote the following "I agreed with every point he made as I do support a Jewish Israel." or perhaps you just ignored it. It is true that radical Islam will claim that Israel were never in the land and they will focus on the Ashkenazi to prove the point. That is why the Ashkenazi must stop making false claims. I am not alone in this, the Sephardic Jews also refuse to recognise the Ashkenazi as Abramic stock, they only recognise them as converts and forbid their daughters to marry into Ashkenazi families!
The Sephardic believe that ones ancestors must have sojourned in the wilderness with Moses and that they must have been present when the laws were passed down. As I have previously have posted, DNA studies prove the Ashkenazi aren't of middle eastern origin. DNA studies prove the the Sephardic are of middle eastern origin.
The bible clearly states that the seed of Isaac / Israel ( seed meaning blood line ) would inherit Israel. I have no fear of Islam or the nations that will come up against Israel as I know God will bring victory to the real Jews of Israel and expose those false Jews that has brought shame upon Gods chosen people.

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.​
(Revelation 2:9).​

Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. (Revelation 3:9).
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, Axehead and all.

Simple, yet profound. You could say it's profoundly simple.

Axehead

Or, one could say it was profoundly simplistic! That is NOT what makes a person "of Isra'el!" If one comes to the conclusion that anyone who "finds God in a personal encounter" or anyone who is "found of God in a personal encounter" is one who is "of Isra'el," then that one has SNAPPED the ropes of the ship tying it to its moorings!

What good are the prophecies at all if one cannot count on to WHOM they are referring?! We may as well just fold up the Holy Bible and throw it away; it's no good if it's not true! If God wasn't talking to the Isra'elis BORN from the lineage of Isra'el (who is Ya`aqov, the son of Yitschaq with the birthright and the blessing, the son of Avraham with the birthright and the blessing) when He made the promises to Isra'el in both the Torah and the Prophets, then what CAN we trust?!

Anyone who doesn't read the Tanakh (the OT) for its history and its literal truth about God's words to mankind is a FOOL!

It doesn't make sense for the definition of "Isra'el" to be changed by way of analogy because one would no longer have the foundational truth upon which the analogy was made! Can't anyone see the logic of that?! It's not necessary, anyway! The grammatical, historical and largely literal interpretation of the Scriptures is the ONLY way to translate the Scriptures with any sort of consistency!

If I said, "These brass brads are the 'nails' that hold the document together"; and then say that the brads ARE INDEED "nails," essentially changing the definition of "brads," and tried to use them with a hammer into a wooden plank, how far would I get? THINK ABOUT IT!