Copperhead
Well-Known Member
Well Jay, since we are dramatically different in our view of eschatological events, then I can see how it would not line up with what you see.
Most have understood that all the events after chapter 3 in the book of Revelation equate to Daniel's 70th week of Daniel 9, which represents a 7 year period and the main focus is Israel during that time just as Gabriel told him. There has always been some debate on the details within that, but still a 7 year period.
You seem to suggest it is a multi century time period. The problem with that is there is nothing concrete in scripture to support that view. The Torah requires the testimony of two or more witnesses for anything to be established. Those witnesses are the Tanakh and the NT. And there is nothing in either to suggest that the tribulation period including the vial, bowl, trumpet, etc judgements are in anyway other than during that 7 year period of Daniel's 70th week.
The previous 69 weeks of years in Daniel 9 were laid out by Gabriel as from the time of the decree to rebuild Jerusalem by Artaxerxes in 445 BC to the Messiah, and that occurred in the number of years Gabriel said it would. There is no justification for the 70th week to mean anything other than 7 years.
And what of the two literal witnesses of Revelation 11 before any bowl judgements? And the measuring of the literal Temple during that time? How is it that no one could touch them, they were eventually killed in Jerusalem, the entire world (that would require satellite TV broadcasting) celebrated their literal death, and they were resurrected and taken up in 3 days? This would have to happen before the bowl judgements, and you suggest we are already at the 6th one of those. That is just one of the many events that would not correspond to you timeline unless one allegorizes the scripture to extreme.
There is a maxim in Bible exegesis..... if the plain sense of the text, within the context of the text, makes sense, then seek no other sense. There has to be some sort of objective base line in scripture interpretation, else we end up all over the map. And the Bereans were commended by Paul for searching the scriptures daily to see if what he taught them was true. They only had the Tanakh at that time. So anything expounded in the NT must be supported in the Tanakh (OT). This goes back to the Torah (law) prescription that it requires two or more witnesses to establish anything.
I would have to agree. You probably should review your understanding of the end time events and rework them.
Shalom!
Cliff
Most have understood that all the events after chapter 3 in the book of Revelation equate to Daniel's 70th week of Daniel 9, which represents a 7 year period and the main focus is Israel during that time just as Gabriel told him. There has always been some debate on the details within that, but still a 7 year period.
You seem to suggest it is a multi century time period. The problem with that is there is nothing concrete in scripture to support that view. The Torah requires the testimony of two or more witnesses for anything to be established. Those witnesses are the Tanakh and the NT. And there is nothing in either to suggest that the tribulation period including the vial, bowl, trumpet, etc judgements are in anyway other than during that 7 year period of Daniel's 70th week.
The previous 69 weeks of years in Daniel 9 were laid out by Gabriel as from the time of the decree to rebuild Jerusalem by Artaxerxes in 445 BC to the Messiah, and that occurred in the number of years Gabriel said it would. There is no justification for the 70th week to mean anything other than 7 years.
And what of the two literal witnesses of Revelation 11 before any bowl judgements? And the measuring of the literal Temple during that time? How is it that no one could touch them, they were eventually killed in Jerusalem, the entire world (that would require satellite TV broadcasting) celebrated their literal death, and they were resurrected and taken up in 3 days? This would have to happen before the bowl judgements, and you suggest we are already at the 6th one of those. That is just one of the many events that would not correspond to you timeline unless one allegorizes the scripture to extreme.
There is a maxim in Bible exegesis..... if the plain sense of the text, within the context of the text, makes sense, then seek no other sense. There has to be some sort of objective base line in scripture interpretation, else we end up all over the map. And the Bereans were commended by Paul for searching the scriptures daily to see if what he taught them was true. They only had the Tanakh at that time. So anything expounded in the NT must be supported in the Tanakh (OT). This goes back to the Torah (law) prescription that it requires two or more witnesses to establish anything.
I would have to agree. You probably should review your understanding of the end time events and rework them.
Shalom!
Cliff
Last edited: