The whole premise of the OP's argument is too simplistic and displays ignorance of the history of "the East," especially of ancient Palestine. The Hebrew culture of ancient OT Israel was radically changed Alexander's conquest in the 4th century BC, after which Palenstine became gradually but increasingly Hellenized. Soon Greek systems of thought reshaped Jewish thought, so that Jesus and His disciples even spoke Greek as well as Aramaic. Greek thinkers like Homer and Plato were now studied in Jerusalem cchools called gymnasia. Additionally, Persian influence became more and more influential after the Babylonian exile and return in the 6th century BC. All these influences can be detected in the Judeo-Christian thought of the New Testament era. So modern biblical scholarship seeks to identify the pagan influence on the logic of Jesus and the New Testament writers to understand the text. For exampie, the closest cultural parallels to the practice of Holy Communion come from pagan mystery meals during which it was believed that participants mystically bonded with the "dying and rising god.' No talk of ancient logic an dialectic is competent that does not include such cultural awareness in its reflection. On that, modern biblical scholarship is agreed.
Have you ever asked yourself why the 3 magai are including in the Christmas story, given their insights from eastern astrology that led them to follow whatever the "star of Bethlehem" actually was? Isn't astrology a forbidden occult practice? And have you ever asked ;yourself why Jesus uses spittle, clay, mixed with spittle, and oil anointings as gimmicks in His healing technique? These "aids to faith" are borrowed from the practice of eastern pagan magicians, so that Jesus can be said to have borrowed from the occult of His day! Thus, Jewish skeptics of His day accused Him of being a magician and even argued that His practice of magic was a reason for His crucifixion. Of course, as an Evangelical, I would not call Jesus a magician. But such influences raise the question of where the line falls between heresy and acceptable borrowing from mystical practices of the prevailing culture.