Search results

What I would argue is this, where I feel this argument can't be trumped. To apply verse 11 and 12 to the days of A4E is to then violate verse 4. It is not reasonable that all the words in ch 12 are shut up and sealed until the time of the end except for verse 11 and 12. Daniel 12:4 But thou, O...

Allowed or however we might want to take it to mean, the text says satan entered Judas, thus, in my mind, equals possessed him during the ordeal. After all, how does a spirit being enter someone without it involving possessing them? Luke 22:3 Then entered Satan into Judas surnamed Iscariot...

In your mind, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, you only see A4E being a type for the man of sin. While I OTOH see Judas being a type for the man of sin. Think about it for a minute. A4E defiled a literal temple, except 2 Thessalonians 2:4 is not involving a literal temple. How can there...

Is there even a disagreement then? You gave the impression that you were questioning some or all of what I said in post #235.

Don't play that game here, though. Some of us may have been born at night, but we weren't born last night. Some of us can see right through your charade here. But let's assume your view is correct. Shouldn't that mean anyone that holds to a different view should then be applying all of the...

It is impossible for man to be sinless unless that man is Christ. Yet, it is not impossible for men to be holy, otherwise 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 makes zero sense. Can one be holy without being sinless? Apparently, otherwise God is going to destroy everyone since no one can live up to 'sinless'...

What you need to do is go back and read the following since it is connected with the temple meant in 2 Thessalonians 2:4. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? 17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy...

Speaking of being on housetops. Matthew 24:17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: 18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. Does the same thing come to your mind that comes to my mind when looking at language...

This free will debate aside. Why not submit some compelling arguments that might convince me that Zechariah 14:16-19 can be meaning before Zechariah 14:12 rather than after? After all, if verses 16-19 can be meaning before verse 12 rather than after, I would then no longer have a valid reason to...

How is it reasonable to argue that Dan 12:7 is involving the end of the age, then argue that Daniel 12:11-12 is involving the days of A4E? As if verse 13 in Daniel 12 makes sense if applied to the days of A4E. After all, verse 13 can't be divorced from verse 11 and 12, especially verse 12. Just...

It doesn't contradict free will if they are commanded to come up but then choose not to. But by choosing not to come up, there are consequences for that, such as upon them no rain, whatever that might mean and look like. Is it meaning literal rain? I don't know, I couldn't tell you. All I know...

My thinking is this. Look at all the debates taking place in regards to how this should be interpreted, how that should be interpreted, etc. Obviously, these debates are never going to be settled before Christ returns. Therefore, why can't Christ during a future millennium use that time to put...

Except the following proves they still have free will during Premil's proposed millennium. This assuming the following is involving a millennium post the 2nd coming. Pretty much all Premils think it is involving a millennium post the 2nd coming. Non Premils disagree of course, but that's...

Matthew 13:30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather(sunago) the wheat into my barn. You would have us believe that this part has zero to do with a...

What Premil doesn't admit that? What Premil thinks that deception is occurring throughout the millennium? But let's don't conflate the millennium with satan's little season that follows. IOW, to be deceived during satan's little season does not also mean to be deceived during the millennium...

What was my point then, in regards to my disagreements with @Spiritual Israelite? My point is that 'one sat like unto, appears to be a simile. And that Matthew 13:39 contradicts Revelation 14:14 if the latter is literally meaning Christ. Let's not forget, the reaping in the end of this age...

Speaking of 2 Thessalonians 2:4, and I will use you, me, and @Spiritual Israelite as examples. @Spiritual Israelite, like you and I, have the OD involving events pertaining to the 1st century through His return at the end of this age. @Spiritual Israelite, like you and I, know full well that 2...

Get real at least. Nobody can mistake the 2nd coming once it happens. No one can have lived through the 2nd coming then be deceived about it after the millennium. As if it is possible to question whether the 2nd coming ever happened after it happened. Per Premil it will be obvious when we are in...

Assuming we are in the millennium right now, what could be some things that would undeniably prove it? Per Premil, assuming that view is the correct view, it will be obvious when we are in the millennium and know that we are. Per this view the millennium can't even begin until Christ bodily...

Every question is apparently ridiculous to you. As if some of us have zero reason to ask some of the questions we do. We just like to ask alleged ridiculous questions in order to annoy someone, I guess. That aside. Apparently AI is just as confused about things as some of you are. First I...