As for Paul being the target of Revelations, ask yourself this question: why is John writing to Paul's followers?
Where does it say in Revelation that John was addressing those believers in those churches as Paul's followers?
We know Paul went to Asia and that all of Asia forsook Paul.
We can read why.
Acts 16:6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas. 9 And a vision appeared to Paul in the night; There stood a man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us. 10 And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavoured to go into Macedonia, assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach the gospel unto them.
The Holy Ghost had forbidden Paul & another to preach the word in Asia, Mysia, and even Bithynia because the people there were not seeking the Lord then; but someone in Macedonia was.
We can see how the churches at Asia was faring later on here... below.
Acts 19:26Moreover ye see and hear
, that not alone at Ephesus, but almost throughout all Asia, this Paul hath persuaded and turned away much people, saying that they be no gods, which are made with hands:
So obviously, there were others claiming to be apostles that were endorsing idolatry.
What are the chances that John writing Revelations has nothing to do with them forsaking Paul?
You say that but go on to say otherwise.
I think a blind person can see that John writes to the churches of Asia because they forsook Paul, but why are they not reprimanded if what they did was wrong?
No. You are assuming a lot to accuse people not agreeing with you as blind. John was writing what Jesus told him to write.
Why does John commend the first church, in the very first thing mentioned, regarding them trying ones claiming to be Apostles? So we know all Asia forsook Paul and John doesn't reprimand them for forsaking Paul and that John, in the very first thing mentioned to the first church, praised them for trying and rejecting someone masquerading as an Apostle. If you look at the Greek you will see Revelations 2:2 is not plural, in other words: John did not say "them", "they" or "Apostles" plural.
You are assuming the one of the false apostles was Paul. As big a name as Saul that became Paul has become in the churches, John would mark him by name if he really was one of the false apostles, and explain how and why, because the physician Luke was endorsing Paul throughout the Book of Acts which would require John to do so, but he did not and so you need to pull back your anti-Paul campaign.