Are you guys happy with the recent Iran agreement ending the war?

[Luther7]

Stop Isreal from what?

( According to their teachings), Worldwide governance through talmudic ( anti-christ) law. Strategically speaking they need control of the Middle East to do this. And I dare say that the Islamic world is in league with them.
And thus we are fast approaching the fulfilment of 2 Thessalonians 2.
The question then becomes, which side will you be on?
Will you love not your life unto death? (Revelation 12:11), or go along with their complete Christ-less society ( kind of like today, but with no spiritual freedom) . According to their ( Noahide) laws, worshipping false idols, whom they consider Jesus Christ to be, is grounds for execution.

 

[Luther7]

Have you ever heard of the Barbary War?

Mary

Actually I only heard of it but never examined what exactly it was. Can you please explain?

 

[TLHKAJ]

As someone who is very involved in children's missions and ministry in various countries, Diana Ketterman witnesses to the fact that there are many Muslims coming to Christ, including in Iran, being a large number of Christian converts there. No wonder Netanyahu has no issue influencing a war against Iran.

 

[TLHKAJ]

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[TLHKAJ]

BREAKING:War Escalates in Persian Gulf

 

[stevesonthebay]

I don't think anyone can be happy with the peace deal with Iran. Not because of anything the US or allies have done but because Iran will never stick to any agreement. As Trump said thye have made something like 10 agreements and the Iranians keep breaking the deal.

Just like with Hamas and other radical Islamists they vow never to submit and aim to wipe out Isreal and the west. Including Christians. So any peace deal is just following diplomatic proticols and we all know that none of this will make any difference.

Iran and its proxies have been inflicting terror on Isreal and the west for decades. People forget that the west was the targets only a decade or two ago. Remember 9/11, the 2004 Madrid Commuter Train Bombing, and the 2005 London transport bombings. As well as many smaller attacks on night clubs, buildings and public events. Don't forget many inhumane attacks on their own people and Muslims in many nations. Iran killed something like 10,000 people recently for protesting against the regimes control over their freedoms. 2025–2026 Iran massacres.

So this has been brewing for years and past governments have turned a blind eye. It was inevitable that the west with the EU were going to have to address this whether now or when it gets so bad that they cannot ignore it. If Iran managed to get a nuclear weapon then everyone knows they would use it without hestitation. They want a holy war against all who do not submit to their radical Islam.

So yes keep making deals and keep making the Iranians accountable when they break deals. They only understand one way which is force. If we don't deal with this then they will wipe out Isreal and then start attacking the west again. In fact they are already doing this with many radicals secretly plotting in western nations who were allowed to immigrate and import their toxic ideology.

In some ways the radical Islamists are winning the culture war. Never just mind Iran. Many westerners are taking up their cause and becoming radicalised against their own nations. They would rather side with terrorist than with their own free nations. In some ways the freedoms the west have given has allowed some to then try and bring down their own governments.

The difference is unlike the Iranian regime we don't wipe out 1,000s for protesting. But we should take a stand against those who want to destroy the west from within as this is only helping the Islamists who want to destroy the west anyway they can. Which includes spreading their vile and hate for the west.

 

[TLHKAJ]

but because Iran will never stick to any agreement.

WOW ...where have you been the last several months? It is Israel and the US that has broken every single "cease-fire." What's going on with you people who refuse to acknowledge the truth??

 

[Marymog]

Actually I only heard of it but never examined what exactly it was. Can you please explain?

I don't know if you want me to explain the Barbary Wars or explain how I am connecting it to what you said. I assume you want me to make the connection to what you said since you can Google the Babary wars yourself.

You said that you "Cannot imagine what the first " administration" would say about the United States government and it's military being held captive to fight a war in the interest of another country. The Middle East was never a threat to our national security."

I would argue that we can PROBABLY imagine what the first administration would say about our military fighting a war in the interest of another country AND the middle east has been a threat to our security since the founding of this country.

The Barbary Wars started during the 3rd administration (Thomsas Jefferson) because the Barbary pirates were causing problems to our security and sovereignty since the first administration (George Washington). The first administration, Washington, paid the pirates and tried to work with them diplomatically. The third administration, Jefferson, had enough of them and took military action against them. The Barbary wars took place in the Middle East and were fought by the United States, Sweden, and the Kingdom of Sicily against Middle Eastern countries. We were not only fighting the war for ourselves but for other countries.

With that said your aforementioned statement is, IMO, not accurate. We can imagine what the 1st administration would say because we have historical writings on what they did say/think. AND historically we know that the Middle East has been a threat to our great country since the founding of our country.

Historical Mary

 

[Marymog]

( According to their teachings), Worldwide governance through talmudic ( anti-christ) law. Strategically speaking they need control of the Middle East to do this. And I dare say that the Islamic world is in league with them.
And thus we are fast approaching the fulfilment of 2 Thessalonians 2.
The question then becomes, which side will you be on?
Will you love not your life unto death? (Revelation 12:11), or go along with their complete Christ-less society ( kind of like today, but with no spiritual freedom) . According to their ( Noahide) laws, worshipping false idols, whom they consider Jesus Christ to be, is grounds for execution.

I have never heard this theory before. Very interesting.........

Doing a google search in am unable to find this "talmudic (anti-christ) law" you referenced.

 

[Marymog]

WOW ...where have you been the last several months? It is Israel and the US that has broken every single "cease-fire." What's going on with you people who refuse to acknowledge the truth??

Is the video you posted evidence that the US and Isreal have broken the cease fire? Or do you have a copy of the cease fire agreement?

Let's pretend your allegation is true. Why would Iran attack other middle eastern countries?

Curious Mary

 

[Wrangler]

The first administration, Washington, paid the pirates and tried to work with them diplomatically. The third administration, Jefferson, had enough of them and took military action against them.

I read a book about this. By the time Jefferson took office, something like 40% of the federal budget was to bribe the barbary pirates.

 

[Ziggy]

I read a book about this. By the time Jefferson took office, something like 40% of the federal budget was to bribe the barbary pirates.

The Barbary pirates, who had been marauding off the coast of Africa for centuries, encountered a new enemy in the early 19th century: the young United States Navy.

The North African pirates had been a menace for so long that by the late 1700s most nations paid tribute to ensure that merchant shipping could proceed without being violently attacked.

In the early years of the 19th century, the United States, at the direction of President Thomas Jefferson, decided to halt the payment of tribute. A war between the small and scrappy American Navy and the Barbary pirates ensued.

A decade later, a second war settled the issue of American ships being attacked by pirates. The issue of piracy off the African coast seem to fade into the pages of history for two centuries until resurfacing in recent years when Somali pirates clashed with the U.S. Navy.

The Barbary pirates operated off the coast of North Africa as far back as the time of the Crusades. According to legend, the Barbary pirates sailed as far as Iceland, attacking ports, seizing captives and enslaving them, and plundering merchant ships.

As most seafaring nations found it easier, and cheaper, to bribe the pirates rather than fight them in a war, a tradition developed of paying tribute for passage through the Mediterranean. European nations often worked out treaties with the Barbary pirates.

By the early 19th century the pirates were essentially sponsored by the Arab rulers of Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli.

https://www.thoughtco.com/young-u-s-navy-battled-north-african-pirates-1773650

 

[Luther7]

I don't know if you want me to explain the Barbary Wars or explain how I am connecting it to what you said. I assume you want me to make the connection to what you said since you can Google the Babary wars yourself.

You said that you "Cannot imagine what the first " administration" would say about the United States government and it's military being held captive to fight a war in the interest of another country. The Middle East was never a threat to our national security."

I would argue that we can PROBABLY imagine what the first administration would say about our military fighting a war in the interest of another country AND the middle east has been a threat to our security since the founding of this country.

The Barbary Wars started during the 3rd administration (Thomsas Jefferson) because the Barbary pirates were causing problems to our security and sovereignty since the first administration (George Washington). The first administration, Washington, paid the pirates and tried to work with them diplomatically. The third administration, Jefferson, had enough of them and took military action against them. The Barbary wars took place in the Middle East and were fought by the United States, Sweden, and the Kingdom of Sicily against Middle Eastern countries. We were not only fighting the war for ourselves but for other countries.

With that said your aforementioned statement is, IMO, not accurate. We can imagine what the 1st administration would say because we have historical writings on what they did say/think. AND historically we know that the Middle East has been a threat to our great country since the founding of our country.

Historical Mary

" Historical" Mary, like I said, I am not informed enough to have the back and forth. However, a quick Google search tells me :

The Barbary Wars were not considered a Middle Eastern threat, but rather a North African maritime threat centered on commercial piracy and freedom of navigation.While modern observers sometimes draw parallels between the Barbary Wars and contemporary Middle Eastern conflicts due to the involvement of Muslim powers, framing the conflict as a "Middle Eastern threat" is historically inaccurate for several key reasons.

So I believe it would be safe to say we didn't have to deal with a demonic parasite raping our finances to genocide in the name of " god's chosen peeple".

 

[Marymog]

" Historical" Mary, like I said, I am not informed enough to have the back and forth. However, a quick Google search tells me :

The Barbary Wars were not considered a Middle Eastern threat, but rather a North African maritime threat centered on commercial piracy and freedom of navigation.While modern observers sometimes draw parallels between the Barbary Wars and contemporary Middle Eastern conflicts due to the involvement of Muslim powers, framing the conflict as a "Middle Eastern threat" is historically inaccurate for several key reasons.

So I believe it would be safe to say we didn't have to deal with a demonic parasite raping our finances to genocide in the name of " god's chosen peeple".

Good point Luther. I stand corrected. The countries involved in the barbary wars are not considered part of the middle east, but they are considered part of the broader middle east geographically. It is worth noting they are culturally and geopolitically aligned with middle east countries. Different people, same ideology.

I will admit my geography was NOT 100% accurate but your contention is 0% accurate. With that said my main contention is still true: We CAN imagine what the first administration would say about the United States government and its military being held captive to fight a war in the interest of another country and the Middle East area IS a threat to our national security.

What do you mean 'we didn't have to deal with a demonic parasite raping our finances to genocide in the name of "god's chosen people? Who is committing genocide? Who is "raping our finances"?

Curious Mary

 

[TLHKAJ]

Is the video you posted evidence that the US and Isreal have broken the cease fire? Or do you have a copy of the cease fire agreement?

Let's pretend your allegation is true. Why would Iran attack other middle eastern countries?

Curious Mary

Watch the video and decide. BUT ...if you've been coherent over the last several months, you know that Israel and the US have been the ones who violated "cease-fires." Why would Iran or Russia or anyone else take Trump at his word with his track record? No wonder they are gearing up now. I would do the same if I were them. Trump threatens nuclear war at the drop of a hat.

 

[Ziggy]

This could be IMPORTANT
HUGS

 

[Wrangler]

I will admit my geography was NOT 100% accurate but your contention is 0% accurate.

Agreed. The contention is not about geography (Middle East) or culture (Persian or Arab) but ideology. Islam has been the bane of the human condition since its inception 1400 years ago and has killed more people than any ideology in human history and with communism and fascism killing 100M in the 20th century alone, that is saying somethig.

 

[Luther7]

Good point Luther. I stand corrected. The countries involved in the barbary wars are not considered part of the middle east, but they are considered part of the broader middle east geographically. It is worth noting they are culturally and geopolitically aligned with middle east countries. Different people, same ideology.

I will admit my geography was NOT 100% accurate but your contention is 0% accurate. With that said my main contention is still true: We CAN imagine what the first administration would say about the United States government and its military being held captive to fight a war in the interest of another country and the Middle East area IS a threat to our national security.

What do you mean 'we didn't have to deal with a demonic parasite raping our finances to genocide in the name of "god's chosen people? Who is committing genocide? Who is "raping our finances"?

Curious Mary

Good point Luther. I stand corrected. The countries involved in the barbary wars are not considered part of the middle east, but they are considered part of the broader middle east geographically. It is worth noting they are culturally and geopolitically aligned with middle east countries. Different people, same ideology.

I will admit my geography was NOT 100% accurate but your contention is 0% accurate. With that said my main contention is still true: We CAN imagine what the first administration would say about the United States government and its military being held captive to fight a war in the interest of another country and the Middle East area IS a threat to our national security.

What do you mean 'we didn't have to deal with a demonic parasite raping our finances to genocide in the name of "god's chosen people? Who is committing genocide? Who is "raping our finances"?

Curious Mary

Mary. I'm going to assume you don't know the answer to your own question.

Psssst........ It's the .....Amish....just kidding just kidding. You know who controls everything.

 

[Luther7]

It did not pass. But we know it won't go away.

 

[TLHKAJ]

It did not pass. But we know it won't go away.

I actually deleted it bc I do not believe there will be a pre-trib rapture.