Here you simply prove that you don't know what abomination of desolation means. Since that is the starting point for great tribulation you cannot understand great tribulation without knowing what Christ is referring to when He speaks of things His disciples shall have to endure as they/we proclaim the Gospel of the Kingdom of God unto all the nations of the world.
When you can give a biblical defense to prove, and not simply your unbiblical opinions as you have above, then perhaps we can discuss what the Bible tells us abomination of desolation that was the beginning of great tribulation for the disciples actually is???
Sorry but the world hasn't been experiencing the elect fleeing Judea/Jerusalem to the mountains for 2,000 years and waiting
The world nor Judea/Jerusalem has seen or experienced a time of trouble that will never be seen again in earth's history, "No Nor Ever Shall Be" a time to be shortened or "No Flesh Should Be Saved"
Yes believing and teaching that the "Great Tribulation" began in the 1st century when the Lord was upon this earth is 100% a false preterist teaching, Daniel's AOD as seen in Matthew 24:15
(When Ye Therefore Shall See The Abomination Of Desolation) this "Starts" the Great Tribulation", and it didn't take place during the Lord's time on the earth or anytime after
You can't have a "Great Tribulation" taking place in the 1st century during the Lord's time on earth, with the elect running away from Judea to the mountains as seen in Matthew 24:16 for 2,000 years and waiting, a time so bad it won't be seen again on earth
(No Nor Ever Shall Be) for 2,000 years and waiting, (LAUGHABLE)
The words as seen in Matthew 24:22 below
(Except Those Day's Should Be Shortned, There Should Be No Flesh Saved: ) this doesn't represent a 2,000 year ongoing tribulation and waiting for a future second coming, who you trying to bamboozle, "Not Me"!
You will closely note that the "Great Tribulation" takes place in verse 21 seen below, you will closely note that "Immediately" after this "Great Tribulation" the "Future", literal, visible, second coming takes place, any reasonable person knows that this second coming is "Future" unfulfilled, it's that simple
Conclusion: Reformed preterist eschatology's many claims are wrong, as it bends and twists the very clear scripture trying to establish 1st century fulfillment "Wrong"!
A Few Examples Of Reformed Preterist Eschatology's False Claims:
1.) Jesus isn't returning literally and visibly as shown in verse 30 below, it all equates to a judgement of the Jews/Israel by Jesus from his throne in heaven, using Roman Armies in 70AD Jerusalem's destruction as his agents for judgement
2.)
The "Great Tribulation" has been taking place for 2,000 years and it will end at a future second coming of Jesus
Matthew 24:15-22KJV
15
When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)
16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house:
18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.
19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:
21 For
then shall be great tribulation, such as was not
since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
22 And
except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
Matthew 24:29-30KJV
29
Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and
they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
