678, take another look - clearly you missed the teaching but when I have time I will expand on what beginning and end means
It appears we need to go through this slowly so everyone is one the same page.
alpha and omega noun
[from the fact that alpha and omega are respectively the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet]
1 : the beginning and ending
2 : the principal element
I assume no one is going to deny this is factual information relating to the words alpha and omega.
That which has a beginning and an end - yes?
Old Jack... are you on board?
Was it the Dr. part of his credentials which caused him to stray so far from the Shema - we may never know.
Though Floyd rejected the above in search of published works I personally feel he should continue to read and prayerfully consider the evidence which is being presented.
I will be showing Floyd (and others participants) why Jesus' sin‐covering sacrifice was made effective by Jesus’ humanity (not deity) and come to see him as the apostles and first‐century Christians did: Jesus Christ: Son of God; Son of Man.
When we read the OT we find it refers to Jesus Christ in two ways: typology (which is symbolic) and prophecy. Most if not all Christians should agree with this statement. Jesus appears in prophecy, it is the implications of these symbolic and prophetical revelations which seriously impact NT Christology:
Atoning sacrifice for Adam and Eve (Genesis 3:21)
Melchizedek (Genesis 14:18; cp. Hebrews 5:10, 7:1‐10, 9:11)
Ram sacrificed by Abraham (Genesis 22:11‐13)
Passover lamb (Exodus 12; cp. John 1:29, 1 Peter 1:19, Revelation 5:6)
Sin offering for high priest & (Leviticus 4)
Brass serpent on pole (Numbers 21:8‐9; cp. John 3:14)
Joseph (Genesis 37‐41)
Boaz (Ruth 2‐4)
King David (1 Samuel 17‐1 Kings 2)
King Solomon (1 Kings 4‐1 Kings 11)
What the Trinitarian has struggled to accept as we have seen in Wormwoods communication with Nothead is the various primary roles Messiah is presented
(1) sacrifice for sin
(2) priest
(3) redeemer
(4) divinely anointed king in King David’s family line.
The Bible both NT and OT speak of a Jewish Messiah who incorporates all four roles simultaneously, none of which requires him to be God, and two (sacrifice for sin and descendent of King David) requiring he is not God.
A note to the Trinitarians - you will have seen so far in all our deliberations a failure to respond to these Scriptural arguments - why so? Why when sound Bible reasoning is put forward is there no rebuttal?
I suggest the only reason I perceive thus far is there are none to be found.
Truth has been revealed and rejected
Purity