In a sense you are correct, but who knows everything God is saying to everyone through the Bible?
Then again consider this:
"And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen." John 21:25
Then again:
Is God limited by the Bible? He is limited certainly by His own Word. He will never contradict Himself. But as we know people will find and have found what they call contradictions in the Bible. Does this mean we should take their word for it throw out the whole thing or even go in favor of one rendering of the Word of God as opposed to another? Or should we go along with Thomas Jefferson who cut out and discarded parts of the Bible that he believed should not be in it?
"For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away." I Cor 13:9-10
Who is it that knows what this perfect is and who is it that will do away with that which is in part? Not me. Was Gamaliel wrong in what he said here?
"And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought:
But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God." Acts 5-38-39
We certainly at least give some serious consideration to his point of view, shouldn't we?
His point of view is nothing short of 'revelation from God'. If you believe you have a dream from God, and you believe he has a gift of interpretation of dreams which is from God, then his interpretation is nothing short of revelation. God is telling you or showing you such and such and this is what you need to do.
This is dangerous. Can be manipulative.
Again, these things are assumed: 1.) That God is using him this way. 2.) That your dream is from God, which he doesn't know. 3.) That he is correct in his interpretation. All of which are in light of the fact that God does not list dream interpretation as a spiritual gift.
If one wants to declare himself an interpreter of dreams, when no such spiritual gift is given, then I don't see how I am one who could be fighting against God. Instead, if one declares such a thing, they should give the dream first and then the interpretation.
Stranger