D
Dave L
Guest
I'm not sure about what you are saying. Could you clarify it more so?No, that is a scriptural violation of John/Jesus' command, saying "this book." For he did not say all scripture.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'm not sure about what you are saying. Could you clarify it more so?No, that is a scriptural violation of John/Jesus' command, saying "this book." For he did not say all scripture.
People incorrectly assume that the command/warning/curse at the end or the book of Revelation includes the whole bible. But that is not what it says. Other places in the scriptures it refers to books and the scriptures collectively, but in the book of Revelation. It says in particular "this book." Meaning, that if one adds to that book, any of the other books, that in fact would be adding. But the command/warning/curse is specific, saying only "this book."I'm not sure about what you are saying. Could you clarify it more so?
All prophecy today is false. Paul was speaking to his immediate audience in 2nd person plural. Not to us.
He's quoting OT scripture "ye" in the past (aorist) tense that applies to us today.Hebrews 3:7-8, Hebrews 3:15, and Hebrews 4:7, I suppose, is also speaking to the immediate audience and not to us.
Sometimes it can be a double-edged sword.
How does this relate to our discussion?People incorrectly assume that the command/warning/curse at the end or the book of Revelation includes the whole bible. But that is not what it says. Other places in the scriptures it refers to books and the scriptures collectively, but in the book of Revelation. It says in particular "this book." Meaning, that if one adds to that book, any of the other books, that in fact would be adding. But the command/warning/curse is specific, saying only "this book."
In addition, the "Bible" which constituted the Christian canons of both the Old and New Testament was generally established by the 5th century, despite some scholarly disagreements. Which would mean the church fathers would have added and taken away any real ability to claim that the command/warning/curse of the book of Revelation ("this book") included anything in particular of the rest of scripture, making the argument moot.
I'm going to let the Holy Spirit be the One to answer that question for you.How does this relate to our discussion?
But some of God's word doesn't apply to us today...smorgasborg religion.He's quoting OT scripture "ye" in the past (aorist) tense that applies to us today.
Some of God's word applies only to certain people. If we don't understand this, we can end up sinning.But some of God's word doesn't apply to us today...smorgasborg religion.
I don't get the connection.I'm going to let the Holy Spirit be the One to answer that question for you.
My prayer would be for you to better communicate.You should pray about it then.
All scripture is given by inspiration of the Lord and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness; that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Timothy 3:16-17.Some of God's word applies only to certain people. If we don't understand this, we can end up sinning.
We learn from their mistakes too.All scripture is given by inspiration of the Lord and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness; that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Timothy 3:16-17.
My prayer for you would be for you to think less naturally. (iow, listen to the Holy Spirit when you don't get something).My prayer would be for you to better communicate.
:)My prayer for you would be for you to think less naturally.
How about the false prophets?Whose mistakes?
So true. Nowhere does that Scripture say: "All Scripture shows us the way we should act."We learn from their mistakes too.
That doesn't follow from the (immediate) context of this conversation.How about the false prophets?