- Aug 9, 2015
- 1,170
- 30
- 48
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
so I can take this as you cannot answer the question? LOL... (smile). Just can't answer a simple question. how hard is it. Oh well, the answer is ONE PERSON, see how easy it is to answer.And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the Son >> I just luv your apostasy!! as The jews wanted to stone Jesus because he said I Am >> and I see in your evil lust do not understand the bible at all and what it talks about. Its really intro that any one can take parts of the bible and run with it and make it any way they want {satan} but I will leave you with the sword of GodJesus>>
And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:
And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. The Jews Knew when Jesus I'm >> but you have no understanding>>MMMM 2000 years and still no understanding>> sad.
the only begotten son, is that in Spirit or in flesh?. and two is the definition "Son" only mean flesh? question, Isaiah 35:4 "Say to them that are of a fearful heart, Be strong, fear not: behold, your God will come with vengeance, even God with a recompence; he will come and save you". now if God came and saved us who is son, then who is this saviour, saiah 43:11 "I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour".Hopefully, here are some scriptures that should cause honest-hearted people to reevaluate their position on the Trinity. At John 3:16, Jesus clearly identifies himself as "the only-begotten Son of God", saying that "God loved the world so much that he gave his only begotten Son, so that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life".
How can Jesus be "begotten" or has a father, if he is God ? Psalms 90:2 says that God is "from everlasting to everlasting", having had no beginning. Yet of Jesus, he said that he is "the beginning of the creation by God" at Revelation 3:14. And at 2 Corinthians, the apostle Paul says: "Praise be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ".(2 Cor 1:3; see also Eph 1:3)
Hopefully, here are some scriptures that should cause honest-hearted people to reevaluate their position on the Trinity.
I disagree with that assessment. in Job that you quoted have nothing to do with angels as sons of God. if you like, we can take this one step at a time. and I'll start with the first premise of evidence. James 1:17 "Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning". if one would look up the word "Father", I'm using the blue letter bible online, Genesis 1:1 (KJV)This question of whether an ' only begotten son is either flesh or spirit ' is moot, trying to deflect the real point of Jesus being uniquely created by Jehovah God and not part of a trinity. That a son can be either flesh or spirit, as for example, the angels are called "sons of God" at Job 38:7: "When the morning stars joyfully cried out together, and all the sons of God began shouting in applause" upon laying the foundation for the earth billions of years ago.(Job 38:4)
#1. Angels are never sons. #2. U said, "Jehovah's "master worker" (Prov 8:30) together created the universe with all its life". sorry Wisdom is God himself, he needed no help nor did he work "together" with anyone else. supportive scripture, Isaiah 44:24 "Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself". the Lord Jesus didn't have any help. he was alone, by himself.Jesus established himself as the "only-begotten Son of God" (John 3:16) unique in all the universe, while Jehovah and he as Jehovah's "master worker" (Prov 8:30) together created the universe with all its life (Col 1:16), so that other sons came into existence, such as the angels who number into the hundreds of millions.(Dan 7:10)
Job 38:7 "sons of God" is often rendered as "angels"
"The sons of God, as it here follows, the latter clause of the verse being explicatory of the former, as is most frequent in this and some other books of Scripture, to wit, the angels, who may well be called stars" - Matthew Poole's English Annotations.
So, will sound reasoning be used or will there be a continuation of twisting the scriptures, believing in the Trinity ?
so I can take this as you cannot answer the question? LOL... (smile). Just can't answer a simple question. how hard is it. Oh well, the answer is ONE PERSON, see how easy it is to answer.
this is correct."#1. Angels are never sons."
you're correct again, so many translation are inaccurateJob 38:7 "sons of God" is often rendered as "angels"
this is correct.
you're correct again, so many translation are inaccurate
but in the book of Job there are son of God, just not in chapter 38 listen, Job 1:3 "His substance also was seven thousand sheep, and three thousand camels, and five hundred yoke of oxen, and five hundred she asses, and a very great household; so that this man was the greatest of all the men of the east". can you spot the Sons of God in this one verse.
GINOLJC to all, first thanks for your response. Job 1:3 "His substance also was seven thousand sheep, and three thousand camels, and five hundred yoke of oxen, and five hundred she asses, and a very great household; so that this man was the greatest of all the men of the east". the word "men" here is the key. in Hebrew, it's strong's H1121 בֵּן ben (bane) n-m. the exact same word used in Genesis 6:2 for sons of God. there in the plural like here with men. please look this up. now why did the writer use men here instead of Sons. the writer could have used. H582 אֱנוֹשׁ 'enowsh (en-oshe') n-m for men. but the writer used H1121 בֵּן ben (bane) n-m. and here's why. in the very next verse Job and the men of the east and Job sons was keeping God feast days. how do we know this. examine verse 4 closely. Job 1:4 "And his sons went and feasted in their houses, every one his day; and sent and called for their three sisters to eat and to drink with them". in verse 2, Job had 7 sons and 3 daughters. and each son "feasted" in their own house. they was having a 7 day feast. do this sound familiar? it should. Deuteronomy 16:15 "Seven days shalt thou keep a solemn feast unto the LORD thy God in the place which the LORD shall choose: because the LORD thy God shall bless thee in all thine increase, and in all the works of thine hands, therefore thou shalt surely rejoice". but there's more. next verse, Deuteronomy 16:16 "Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the LORD thy God in the place which he shall choose; in the feast of unleavened bread, and in the feast of weeks, and in the feast of tabernacles: and they shall not appear before the LORD empty". how many daughters did Job have ....... 3. and these feasts are to be held 3 times a year.No, I don't see "sons of God" in Job 1:3.
GINOLJC to all, first thanks for your response. Job 1:3 "His substance also was seven thousand sheep, and three thousand camels, and five hundred yoke of oxen, and five hundred she asses, and a very great household; so that this man was the greatest of all the men of the east". the word "men" here is the key. in Hebrew, it's strong's H1121 בֵּן ben (bane) n-m. the exact same word used in Genesis 6:2 for sons of God. there in the plural like here with men. please look this up. now why did the writer use men here instead of Sons. the writer could have used. H582 אֱנוֹשׁ 'enowsh (en-oshe') n-m for men. but the writer used H1121 בֵּן ben (bane) n-m. and here's why. in the very next verse Job and the men of the east and Job sons was keeping God feast days. how do we know this. examine verse 4 closely. Job 1:4 "And his sons went and feasted in their houses, every one his day; and sent and called for their three sisters to eat and to drink with them". in verse 2, Job had 7 sons and 3 daughters. and each son "feasted" in their own house. they was having a 7 day feast. do this sound familiar? it should. Deuteronomy 16:15 "Seven days shalt thou keep a solemn feast unto the LORD thy God in the place which the LORD shall choose: because the LORD thy God shall bless thee in all thine increase, and in all the works of thine hands, therefore thou shalt surely rejoice". but there's more. next verse, Deuteronomy 16:16 "Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the LORD thy God in the place which he shall choose; in the feast of unleavened bread, and in the feast of weeks, and in the feast of tabernacles: and they shall not appear before the LORD empty". how many daughters did Job have ....... 3. and these feasts are to be held 3 times a year.
so going back to verse 3 Job was a blessed man and his substance was GREAT. and Job was the "greatest" of all the men/sons of the east.
the book of Job is full of unseen on the surface information. plenty to be gleam from this book.
East don't produce sons. sons here are spiritual. understand the word or term "son" it don't always mean in the flesh like male offspring. no, sons spiritually speaking means a manifest of certain character, or moral characteristics. the way one acts, good or evil. spiritually without reference to sex, or the gender. tigger 2, H1121 בֵּן ben (bane) n-m is in reference to characteristics, a son should act like their father. and Job and these men did to the best of their ability.I still don't see 'sons of God' in Job 1:3. The word ben H1121 is merely 'sons of.' In Job 1:3 it is used with 'East' ('sons of [the] East'). And at Genesis 6 'sons of' is used with 'God' ('sons of God').