Funny how YOU rant on about "unprovable" and "unbiblical" lies - while you base your entire position on the false and man-made doctrine of Sola Scriptura - which is itself, UNSCRIPTURAL.
Disagree.
The Scripture reveals;
2 Tim 3:
[
16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and
is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
There is NO Biblical requirement for everything we believe to be on the pages of Scripture.
Correct. Humans have FREEWILL to believe whatever they want to believe.
So why do YOU consistently SCREAM "Your're"
WRONG to people who DO NOT Agree with YOU?
You present your beliefs...giving NO, Scriptural Doctrine, that what you say is True. You Further claim, (paraphrasing) You do not believe Scriptural Doctrine is necessary for reproof.
HOWEVER - there IS a Biblical mandate that Christ's CHURCH has Supreme Authority to declare the truth -
Absolutely.
Christ's Church IS a Spiritual Church.
Christ IS the SPIRIT ROCK foundation.
Christ IS the SPIRIT Corner STONE.
Christ IS the SPIRIT HEAD.
And the MEMBERS of Christ's Church ARE;
Humans WHOSE "spirit" has been MADE QUICKENED.
that WHATEVER His Church binds or looses on earth will also be bound or loosed in Heaven.
Correct.
Christ's Church IS a Spiritual Church.
Its Members ARE Quickened human "spirits".
Christ even guaranteed that the Holy spirit would guide His Church to ALL TRUTH (John 16:12-15).
Correct.
Christ's Church MEMBERS, Are the congregation. <--- the very thing, the Holy Spirit Promised TO Lead TO: Christ's TRUTH.
Those guarantees are ONLY made about His Chruch - and NOTHING else.
Not true.
The Holy Spirit Often throughout history HAS BEEN "With" human men, (who were Not Spiritually Quickened, Not a Member of Christ's Church,) YET the Holy Spirit was Guiding Them, With TRUTH and profitable Doctrine.
As for your whining about the definition of Kecharitomene - this has been nothing but an exercise in DENIAL and nothing else.
When you are desperately trying to PROVE your point...AND as is your MO...
1) To begin with a condescending remark;
2) Then teach a Doctrine that Cannot be Verified with Scriptural Doctrine...
You have instantly lost the interest of the listener, to trust to believe ANYTHING you have to say.
If I tell you it's raining and you're getting soaking wet outside - your denial of it doesn't magically make it "untrue".
Poor analogy.
The SAME is true for Mary's God-given title of "Kecharitomene" in Luke 1:28).
You saying you believe Kecharitomene is Mary's "Title", Is Irrelevant.
It's not something I believe, nor am I required to.
I do find it amusing that you have spent umpteen posts claiming that is her TITLE, but have only seen you speak about Mary, as Mary...never speaking ABOUT Mary...with her "supposed TITLE"... Kecharitomene Mary!
It's a permanent condition.
Condition? Her TITLE is a condition?
Are you trying to say, Mary being "full of Grace" IS a permanent "condition"?
- Kecharitomene guarantees that she can't . . .
So? WHO argued or Said ANYTHING about Mary falling from Grace?
No one.
WHO DENIED, saying she Could fall from Grace?
No one.
Why are you trying to make an Argument that Mary Could Not fall from Grace...when no one Said She Could?
You obviously have a knack for NOT paying attention to "only" what another Does Say...and instead make up presumptions in YOUR MIND, "as if" you can magically read the thoughts of others.
There is a feature tab on this forum. You can use that tab, and quote ANYONE saying, "Mary was subject to falling from Grace"...
Then respond with your Disagreement.
Until you can do that...your accusations have No merit.
So why not get on TO the ACTUAL Point instead of dancing around in circles?
Is it your View that a person Full of Gods Unmerited Favor (Grace) IS the definition of SINLESS ?
If so, why not state that claim IN YOUR own Words?
And IF you are capable, also state your source, and What your source says via a quote in the source.
