What do you think? (forum topic link below)
Skepticism versus gullibility
Just heard a sermon that came down pretty hard on skepticism.
Trying to process how I feel about that. Thanks for listening. (send help)
It appears that there is no room for healthy skepticism in the church.
But for some reason the skeptics weren't called gullible. No one was, actually.
We are offered apologetics to counteract skepticism. (unbelief)
I was raised evangelical Protestant.
I remember my state of shock when I found out where the Bible actually came from.
Not what the church told me.
I had never heard of the canon of scripture.
I thought a cannon was a war relic, not a religious relic. - Ha!
Same with the hell doctrine.
No one informed me that there were three biblical doctrines of the final judgment.
They did bad-mouth Universalism though.
I had no idea that Universalism was actually a Christian doctrine from the early church in the East.
Which is where the church came from, hello?
And what about inerrancy? Don't get me started... Grr...
Anyone else want to rant on either aspect? Thanks.
/