reformed1689
Well-Known Member
- Oct 15, 2019
- 4,618
- 1,481
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
You are not a moderator and this is absolutely a debatable topic.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are not a moderator and this is absolutely a debatable topic.
But that's what you did.If you are going to build a whole doctrine out of isolated verses, well, we are in more disagreement than I thought.
I interpret it strictly because it is WRITTEN strictly. I know that doesn't seem to matter to some people which is how we end up with women pastors.
Christians should simply ignore dreams since they come to everyone, and indicate that people are in the REM (rapid eye movement) state of sleeping.But if you want to interpret your dreams, Sigmund Freud wrote the best book about it called "The Interpretation of Dreams".
My comment about Sigmund Freud was a tongue in cheek comment to show my belief that trying to interpret dreams belongs to New Age thinking, originating from a godless author who originated the occult-like theory of dream interpretation.Christians should simply ignore dreams since they come to everyone, and indicate that people are in the REM (rapid eye movement) state of sleeping.
"You can have intense dreams during REM sleep, since your brain is more active. REM is important because it stimulates the areas of the brain that help with learning and is associated with increased production of proteins..."
Basics on Sleep
Dream interpretation is similar to those prognosticators who would peep and mutter while they tried to tell someone's fortune. Scrooge would say "Bah! Humbug!"
My comment about Sigmund Freud was a tongue in cheek comment to show my belief that trying to interpret dreams belongs to New Age thinking, originating from a godless author who originated the occult-like theory of dream interpretation.
Strawman, that is not what I said. I am not basing it solely on Acts 2:17. I take the Bible for what it says, you obviously do not.But that's what you did.
Yes, we are, because if you are going to say that the women can't have dreams because it's not listed in Acts 2:17, then you're going to take the reverse direction and say that the old men will neither prophesy or have visions, and the young men will not have dreams or visions either, and I don't believe you or anyone else here believes that.
Of course this is not true. The Pharisees ADDED to Scripture their own rules. So that is a Red Herring.The Pharisees also interpreted things strictly, because it was "written strictly." They were wrong, so beware how you interpret the word of God. It is only revealed accurately by the Spirit of God. The carnal mind will often interpret it in the exact opposite fashion to how it should be.
God bless,
Hidden in Him
Strawman, that is not what I said. I am not basing it solely on Acts 2:17. I take the Bible for what it says, you obviously do not.
Christians should simply ignore dreams since they come to everyone, and indicate that people are in the REM (rapid eye movement) state of sleeping.
"You can have intense dreams during REM sleep, since your brain is more active. REM is important because it stimulates the areas of the brain that help with learning and is associated with increased production of proteins..."
Basics on Sleep
Dream interpretation is similar to those prognosticators who would peep and mutter while they tried to tell someone's fortune. Scrooge would say "Bah! Humbug!"
Now I'm going to have to try and think if there's any repeat dreams...You can also have repeated dreams like Joseph's Pharaoh in Egypt as a sign from God:
Genesis 41:32 "And for that the dream was doubled unto Pharaoh twice; it is because the thing is established by God, and God will shortly bring it to pass."
I would ignore most dreams but if it seems to repeat and you're impressed then maybe it's from God.
I didn't know that about repeat dreams until I remembered Joseph in Egypt and my psychiatrist keeps asking me if I have any dreams that repeat. But recently I remember having one that repeated and just ignored it and now I can't remember itNow I'm going to have to try and think if there's any repeat dreams...
My mom and I had shared the same dream in one night when I was a child. That one was definitely legit.
The difference is that New Covenant believers have the indwelling Holy Spirit. The New Testament examples of dreams contained clear and unmistakable messages that didn't need interpretation. There is no New Testament evidence that ordinary believers are guided by dreams and visions. Guidance comes from the indwelling Holy Spirit giving us insight into the Scriptures. It is the Scriptures and the Holy Spirit working together to teach us what we need to know.Did you know that's like half of the book of Daniel?
I thought it was weird but I wasn't going to be a jerk about it.
I mean if you look at Daniel, who by the Holy Spirit interpreted dreams and that's like a big part of the story, and Joseph who actually had dreams and then also interpreted them- that's in the Bible.
Did you remember that when Moses threw down his staff and it turned into the snake, so did the sorcerers? When he turned the water into blood, the sorcerers did the same? How in Revelation, God leaves his seal on the 144,000 and its followed by mark of the beast?
Do you see how everything becomes a mockery of what God did? The Lord gave and Satan creates a mockery to take it away.
That doesn't make everything you look at evil. It means we're in the middle of a spiritual battle and EVERYTHING requires spiritual discernment and most of the time with things like this it can only be discerned by the spirit and scripture.
It goes to the fact that God no longer speaks with special revelation. The Canon is closed. You shall not add to these words.Sorry, reformed. I apologize. If you send me the verse that says women don't have dreams, I'll read it.
Or anything in the Bible that suggests that AT ALL.
Otherwise I'm going to take it your interpretation as being based primarily off of mild spiritual sexism.
Spiritual sexism? Oh brother. I know you don't like the fact that men are given the leadership roles in Scripture as continuing roles for today. Paul's letters are clear on that subject.Otherwise I'm going to take it your interpretation as being based primarily off of mild spiritual sexism.
Because even the Scripture is just dead ineffective letter without the involvement of the Holy Spirit, the Pharisees, because the Holy Spirit was not involved in their interpretation of their Scriptures, their view came from the flesh and not from the Holy Spirit.Of course this is not true. The Pharisees ADDED to Scripture their own rules. So that is a Red Herring.
It goes to the fact that God no longer speaks with special revelation. The Canon is closed. You shall not add to these words.
Case and point, I said I was a complementarian.Spiritual sexism? Oh brother. I know you don't like the fact that men are given the leadership roles in Scripture as continuing roles for today. Paul's letters are clear on that subject.
Fair enough, you did say that. My apologies.Case and point, I said I was a complementarian.
I didn't say I disagreed with Paul. I said I disagreed with you.