I have posted lots of information about these including the scientist himself who has worked on this.
But messenger RNA is just that...a message to do something that your cells can do. (And need to in order to protect you from the virus)
No chance of getting a confused message.
No chance of changing your DNA.
There are some mild risks but they are mild...and at this point no one has yet to exhibit those things whatsoever...and I'm not going to give the antivaxxers any ammunition. They have no clue and I'm not going to give them one.
And millions of vaccines have been administered to extremely fragile population.
OK John, I went back to the beginning to these posts: 1,5,7,13,17,18,20,28,29,31,33,40,45,47.
7 describes the mechanism that you think happens. But gives no scientist or sources.
33 says something about CRISPR Technology, but gives no scientists or sources. I did google CRISPR Technology and found it to be interesting. Adding to the cells, genetic material that could counteract the disease caused by a mutated gene. I would think that the mRNA mechanism would be similar to this. I am sure there are some differences, I am not a scientist. But I still say that a new procedure like adding something to the cell that can change your DNA seems awfully risky at this point. Maybe years down the road and millions of hours of R&R will prove this technique to be life-saving wonderworks. But perhaps in it infancy is not a good time to give it to millions of people.
It may take 50 years to see how millions of people reacted to these vaccines with this technology in them. I would probably wait till alternative vaccines with more normal kinds of mechanisms come out.
Any way, the rest of your posts are you arguing with others, and your opinions.
Not one link to a scientist or a link to a source so I can study your mechanism on post 7.
What do you think?