Phillip told him of course, thats obvious. What is also obvious is that we do not have a record blow by blow so to speak of their conversation......it's summarised as, preaching Jesus.
but I thought they always preached FACAGA?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Phillip told him of course, thats obvious. What is also obvious is that we do not have a record blow by blow so to speak of their conversation......it's summarised as, preaching Jesus.
Willing, eager slave
Well, He didn't need to meet John but hear of him from other Jewish peoples, either during previous visits to Jerusalem or from other Jewish travelers.
John the baptist was a prophet according to the Old Covenant, so even sone pharises came out to be baptized by him.
I have no idea what that acronym isbut I thought they always preached FACAGA?
Yep, Philip ofcourse would not have preached anything different from the Gospel of the Kingdom of God which He learnt ftom the Master Himself.possibly possibly
more likely Philip preach something other than faith alone Christ alone and grace alone
Like maybe Mk 16:16
Using the lot to make one an apostle of Jesus Christ was a gross sin by the apostles.Only to Peter matt 16:18 and the apostles Matt 18:18
And their successors acts 1:26
As far as I know he wasn't present when Phillip spoke to the Eunuch.What happened to FACAGA?
Faith aloneI have no idea what that acronym is
Yep, Philip ofcourse would not have preached anything different from the Gospel of the Kingdom of God which He learnt ftom the Master Himself.
Using the lot to make one an apostle of Jesus Christ was a gross sin by the apostles.
Using the lot to make one an apostle of Jesus Christ was a gross sin by the apostles.
As far as I know he wasn't present when Phillip spoke to the Eunuch.
Phillip never mentioned water-baptism, not even when coerced by the cart thieve..tell that to blood bought who believes baptism is a water cult
Phillip never mentioned water-baptism, not even when coerced by the cart thieve..
The Eunuch knew enough about Judaism to have the book of Isaiah in his possession. It is quite possible that he was a "God fearer" and may well have been around to hear about John the Baptizer. Therefore he would have known about baptism already, allbeit John's baptism.and there are many they cannot answer
Philip preached Jesus! How does the eunuch know about baptism???????????????????????
explain acts 8 then
35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.
36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?
37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.
39 And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.
why the same doctrine? Faith and baptism
Why rejoice? Faith and baptism make him a Christian
Member of Christ in the new covenant
1 Corinthians 12:13
For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
Galatians 3:27
For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Philip preached Jesus! How does the eunuch know about baptism????
Blood bought?tell that to blood bought who believes baptism is a water cult
But here is the kicker . Peter did not say , oh well we have no need to do that anymore .The Eunuch knew enough about Judaism to have the book of Isaiah in his possession. It is quite possible that he was a "God fearer" and may well have been around to hear about John the Baptizer. Therefore he would have known about baptism already, allbeit John's baptism.