Randy Kluth
Well-Known Member
Sorry Randy but you are wrong! Also you reject in measure the Scriptures for formulating systematic theology, but you have a systematic theology whether you call it that or not and you usewhat you think the writers meant - IOW you are redefining the words on teh page. If this sounds harsh, it is for your benefit.
Saying, "your systematic theology is wrong" does not benefit me at all. What about it do you reject?
Paul told Timothy that ALL Scripture is profitable for doctrine, reproof , correction and instruction in righteousness, that we will be complete for all good works.
We both agree that Scripture is inspired and reliable. And yet you suggest I'm wrong and are unable to say why.
If you think Paul is telling swtories and one has to discern what he really means, then why should I accept your words as you write them and not redefine them as you are the Word of God?
If you can't explain what is wrong about my statements, then I strongly encourage you to withdraw your criticism until you can actually put into words what your complaint is! Everything I said is 100% Scriptural. And yet you say it is against Scripture, but are unable to say where it does not align with Scripture. I have to conclude that you're a critic without any sense of what you're criticizing?