Raeneske said:
All are justified through faith in Christ alone.
Again you say this while holding to a written code.
Raeneske said:
But claiming Jesus Christ as Lord, and claiming to have faith in Him, does not change the fact that you must then obey Him. Hence, the pointing to the 10 Commandments, which we must obey.
Can you show us where Christ gave the 10 commandments to obey? But lets start with the fourth shall we?
Raeneske said:
Hebrews 5:9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
I think you took that a little too personal Thegoodground.
Not at all, just responding to your foolishness which it appears was foolish of me.
Will we see humility from you or justification?
Raeneske said:
I was making the point that those who transgress the precepts of the Creator God, and claim Him as Lord, are worshipping Him in vain.
You seem to forget "all men a liars" your point is mute in support of keeping a written code that God took out of the way in His Son.
Raeneske said:
Nowhere was I referring to a post where you were transgressing the Holy Precepts. The conversation is, those who transgress the 10 Holy Precepts of the Creator God, whether it be all 10, or simply one commandment.
You are like a reed blowing in the wind.
Here is what you wrote "But, how can
you claim Christ as Lord, when
you continue to trample upon the Holy Precepts of God?"
Who is the you?
Raeneske said:
Yes, the absolute standard of God’s righteousness. Many continue to claim, and ask what the need for the New law was for. But if you have read, you would read that this was never a new law, it is simply new to those who are having the veil removed from their face.
1 John 2:7-8 Brethren, I write no new commandment unto you, but an old commandment which ye had from the beginning. The old commandment is the word which ye have heard from the beginning. Again, a new commandment I write unto you, which thing is true in him and in you: because the darkness is past, and the true light now shineth.
Those who say you must love your neighbor as yourself, and God with all your heart soul and mind are correct in that statement. The question then is, how do you love God, and love your neighbor? The 10 Commandments show you how to do that. Paul explains this in Romans 13:8-10.
No. Jesus Christ shows you how to do that.
Its
new becuase he was the only
one to fulfill all the law and the prophets, hence why the Law is completely removed from Jew and never offered to the Gentile, though the Spirit of the Law continues in Christ.
By the way your ref to Rom 13
any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Can you please show me in the Law where this command was given as a written Law?
"Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself"
Raeneske said:
Romans 13:8-10 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
Paul unmistakingly points back to the 10 Commandments, showing that to love thy neighbor as yourself, is to keep the commandments. In the same manner, to Love God with all your heart, soul, and mind, is to keep commandments 1-4. You cannot claim love of God, or your neighbor, if you continually transgress the precepts of God’s divine Law.
So do you believe that in keeping "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself" you are keeping the written Law and all its requirements?
Raeneske said:
To continually kill your neighbors does not prove you love them, no matter how much you say you do. To continually steal from your neighbors does not prove you love them, no matter how much you say you do. I am referring to willful and purposeful and unrepentant transgression of the Law of God.
The 10 Commandments are a perfect transcription of Jesus Christ’s Character. As Paul shows you, to love your neighbor, you will not break those commandments, as Jesus Christ did not break His Father’s commandments.
True, the 10 commandments are perfect and holy but now replaced entirely with two great commandments not writtin in stone but upon hearts.
Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
Do you know when the old covenant given in Sinai did vanish or dissapear?
Raeneske said:
The purpose of God’s sacrificial and ceremonial law was to present Christ Jesus to the world in a hands-on, direct way.
No it was to lead the Jews alone who were under Law to Christ. The Law was a teacher - thats all!
Raeneske said:
It was a continual prophecy of years to come to testify of Him that would die. I am not ignorant of the reason of the ceremonial law.
After this interesting statement where you agree the ceremonial law simply could not be continued you now aim to seperate and divide up those Laws you "like" and discard those you see as no longer appropriate.
This is another mistake on your part.
Raeneske said:
However, the 10 Commandments are not the ceremonial laws.
So what you are saying here is the 10 commandments had nothing to do with the ceremonial Law?
The hole you are digging is growing larger as we proceed through the post.
The process of being reconciled to God after breaking the Law has nothing to do with the commandments.
Raeneske said:
The 10 Commandments are the Holy Precepts of the Creator God. All 10 Commandments are supposed to be kept by the Christian.
No - a change to these commandments took place in Christ.
But you teach a return to what Paul calls the beggarly elements.
Gal 4:7Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.
8Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. 9But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? 10Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. ;)
I can only reiterate Pauls words in Gal 4:11
11I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain
Can you explain to me why the Law of Moses incluiding the 10 commandments were weak and beggarly? In what way did God make them weak? And why is Paul afraid for you in trying to live according to Law and not Grace and Mercy?
Much for you to consider.
Raeneske said:
The 10 Commandments did not, and shall not pass away. Who would believe that “Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not worship idols, Thou shalt have no other gods before me, thou shalt not take the Lord’s name in vain, honour thy father and mother, thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not bear false witness, thou shalt not covet” have passed away?
The Spirit has been revealed and now the Law is no longer required - it did it job and completed its task though most of Israel were not teacheable.
Some like Mary, Elizabeth and the disciples search the Law to find the one who would remove the judgements of the written code from their lives.
Raeneske said:
They have not, they are the moral law, the moral standard in which all Christians are to live and keep. The problem then, lies with the Sabbath. The Sabbath Commandment was classed with the moral law, the 7th day Sabbath, and was not classed with the ceremonial laws.
You are chopping up the Law again...thought I would remind you!
A
new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another;
as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. (Joh 13:34)
And yet the Law cursed Christ though he fulfilled every part of it. Its Sabbath he become its Lord. The sacrifices he fufilled every one perfectly. The 10 commandments he obeyed perfectly but still all that the Law was it still cursed him upon that tree.
This is why Jesus was born of a woman made under the Law for it was the Law he came to remove that the Spirit of the Law of liberity may be seen more clearly; one that could offer life to those who obeyed and not death.
Raeneske said:
God purposely put the 7th Day Sabbath in with the other commandments of God.
My comment still stands: you cannot murder people 24/7 and claim Christ as Lord. You cannot even be angry with your bother without cause, nor say “thou fool” to His brother continually, unrepentantly, willingly.
See how you tried to bring together the written law with the Spirit?
It doesnt work does it? What need is there for "you cannot murder people 24/7 and claim Christ as Lord" if you follow with "You cannot even be angry with your bother without cause, nor say “thou fool” to His brother continually, unrepentantly, willingly"
If that which is first is the later and was always in the mind of God from the beginning why go back to that which cannot save?
Your understanding is in reverse!
Christ is first and everything is made around him...
Let me ask you a question.
Wherefore then serveth the law? It was
added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made;
and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
(Gal 3:19)
- Look up the word "added" and tell us what it means and how it applies to Pauls teaching
- Explain what precisely was the Law added too?
- How does the word "till" affect your understading of the Law (including the 10 commandments)
- Who is the seed?
Look forward to hearing your findings.
Raeneske said:
You keep the letter of the law, not murdering people, and you keep the spirit of the law, refusing to be angry with your brother without cause.
You cannot keep the letter - sorry!
Raeneske said:
Okay, faith in Christ is what saves you. But, if you claim you have faith in Christ, but continually break the commandment of stealing, do not your own works deny that you have faith in Christ? How can you tell a Christian from the world? By their fruits, correct? If a Christian shows the fruit of continually stealing purposely and willfully and said, “My faith is what saves me, not my works”, do not the man’s own works deny that He has faith in Jesus Christ? Christ made us free from the bondage of sin. The 10 Commandments tell you what sin is. Christ released you from being a servant to sin, and you have then become a servant of righteousness. By calling Jesus Christ Lord, yet bearing the fruits of Satan, does it show that you are actually a Christian? See then, the works of the man deny that He has faith in Jesus Christ.
I think you are beginning to see you are going in circles and getting nowhere.
Raeneske said:
The law, which is established, is not the ceremonial law. Or else we would have to still perform sacrifices, would we not?
The Law contains everything written or orally given at Sinai.
Raeneske said:
Romans 6:1-2,14-16 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein. For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid. Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Sin is the transgression of the law (1 John 3:4). Can a Christian continue to break the law of God, though they are under grace? No, of course not. How can any Christian continue to live in sin, if they are dead to sin? If a Christian yields himself to continually murder and slander, and steal from his brethren, he then becomes a servant of unrighteousness (the leader there being Satan), but if a Christian does not break the law of God, his fruits show that he is a Christian, and not a leader of unrighteousness.
We have been brought into a relationship of service which requires obedience of the heart, not merely obedience of ritual (Rom 6:17).
Being under divine grace provides a great advantage in the fight of faith, for whereas the law (All the handwritings) condemns and strengthens the hold of sin by making it obvious when disobedience occurs, divine grace provides forgiveness and breaks the control of sin unto ultimate victory.
When Paul claims that we
"are not under law" (note, there is no definite article "the" in the Greek), he does not discount the Mosaic Law as worthless, for although its curse has been removed in Christ (Col 2:14), its figures, types and principles of teaching remain. A spiritual warrior will observe the benefits to be gained by the instruction of the Law (Gal. 3:24), and allow its illustrations to find effect in life. By that means the Law drives us to appreciate the gift of grace.
"That the law is spiritual"
The law reveals the "mind of the spirit" (See Rom 8:27). The Greek word is
pneumatikos, which signifies belonging to or proceeding from the Spirit; thus it expresses the divine mind. In the same sense the meat, water and rock of the wilderness were "spiritual" (1 Cor 10:3-4); they were designed to teach spiritual principles and lessons. Similarly, the law was given that men might perceive the divine mind in the issues of life. As such the law elevates the human mind to higher principles than otherwise perceived (Isa. 55:8-9). Hence the law was an expression of the thoughts and mind of Yahweh. Because of its origin, and in view of that which it expresses, the law must be "spiritual". So Paul states this foundation principle for the dramatic and irrefutable statement which follows.
Of course Paul personally goes on to show you how his carnal nature could not keep the Law as he was sold under sin.
What you need to remember is the "good thing" being the Law did not bring death, it was sin which brought death
The "good thing" revealed sin for what it is, and has shown why man is held captive to death. The very excellence of God's law demonstrated the flesh as extremely evil and worthy of death. The fault was not in the law; it was in Paul's own sinful propensities, which he proceeds to enumerate in Rom 7:15-20
However it stands, the Law could not save - another Law was required and I look forward to hearing you speak to this Law, rather than that which perished and faded away.
TGG