Precious friend?:
(1) "Judging others" is a little dangerous, but "very needed"?
a) Only God alone KNOWS the heart, so isn't JUDGING people, All His Work,
not ours?
No, of course not. If Jesus' work was to judge sin, so is ours. We don't perform the work of redemption, as he does, nor do we act as God, as he did. But we certainly participate in his call to judge sin.
What we don't do is sentence people, since only God can do that. But we can certainly identify them in their display of good or bad fruit.
Paul said that we are to exercise authority within the churches, to prevent false teaching from taking root there. There are clearly different kinds of "judging," so we have to be careful not to confuse two different kinds of judging.
b) Doesn't
Romans 14 teach that "judging others" is a SIN?
"whatsoever is not of faith" (v. 23)? What IF we
SAW "christian fruits" in an athiest?
Should we then
judge them as "being saved"? How much more so those who
should
be our own brothers/sisters
In CHRIST?
That is a very confusing statement. We don't see "Christian fruit" in a "non-Christian!" We may see them act in a Christian appearance, actually doing some good. But to actually act "as a Christian" requires one to *be* a Christian! One can act in accordance with the Spirit, and not even be a Christian. But one cannot imitate being spiritually-renewed in their *nature* without actually *being* a Christian. There is a profound difference between just experiencing God and doing good, on one hand, and having our character changed and emitting Christ out of our relationship with God on the other hand.
c) IF the "doctrine" they are espousing is incorrect, certainly judge that, but not THEM,
and, Separate FROM them, as Paul Clearly Instructs, From God's Inspired Word!:
Paul judged men as good or evil all the time, and even judged Christians when they did not act appropriately. In 1 Cor 5 Paul judged a believer involved in immorality, did not refer to him as a non-brother, but judged him as in sin.
"Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and
offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them."
(Romans_16 : 17 KJB!), Correct Precious friend?
Paul actually judged men as being "of the Devil" at times! That is, he didn't just judge *their doctrine,* but also, their place!
But, we must FIRST make sure OUR doctrine is correct, Correct? i.e:
Which doctrines Are FOR us, Today, Under God's GRACE?
c1) God's GRACE/Mystery Salvation By "GRACE Through Faith Alone"?
or:
God's Prophecy/Law salvation of "faith + works"? or:
The Incredible Combo teaching Of BOTH are FOR us! Confusing, eh?
Not really. The problem is in how we use the word "works." We don't do the work of redemption, which only Christ could do. But we do actively initiate *choice* to embrace Christ over our own way, choosing to do *his work* instead of the works of the flesh.
c2) Then how about prophecy/Law
water baptism WHICH NO ONE agrees on:
I have found
11 Different Traditional denominational teachings, ALL but
one
claiming THEIRS Are From The Scriptures! At least the ONE TOLD THE
Truth, KNOWING/Admitting theirs was UNscriptural, and was "Tradition!"
or:
Under GRACE/Mystery, What If God {NOT "the author of all this
Confusion!},
Says "There Is ONE Baptism," And
THAT IT IS NOT
water! (
Ephesians 4 : 5;
1 Corinthians 12 : 13 KJB!) =
Confusion SOLVED, eh, Precious friend?
Yes, there are different approaches to water baptism. But the "one Baptism" spoken of in the Scriptures refers to *Spirit Baptism*--not Water Baptism. Water Baptism is only symbolic of Spirit Baptism, which is what John the Baptist said was the greater baptism Jesus came to bring.
c3) Then of course there is other Confusing teachings on tongues, healings, miracles,
gifts, dreams/visions and signs, and prophecies, etc., but we won't go there, yet...
I believe in the Gifts of the Spirit. But I don't believe all have all the Gifts! I don't believe all *should* speak in tongues. I believe the Spirit gives gifts *as He wills!*
d) The only
Other Alternative {ecumenism} I know about is to "FORGET ALL doctrine,
and just ALL JOIN together in love to reach/change the world," Correct?
?
"Approved Unto God"? (2 Timothy 2 : 15 KJB!)?
Ok, questions are done.
Please Be Very Richly Blessed!
Yea, ecumenism is a code word for liberal compromise. True "ecumenism" is based on true doctrine and on a true relationship with Christ. That establishes a true brotherhood.