You are only seeing Christ in the flesh. Christ is now spirit
Declaring something with resolute arrogance does not make it so. Christ has not been described anywhere in Scripture as having gone through a transformation from flesh to spirit. The last reference we have to His state of being is, indeed, that of flesh, unless you believe one can thrust his hand into the side of a spirit and get sensory feedback.
The erroneous, convoluted amalgamation of soteriology and eschatology that is being advanced in the thrust of this thread is astounding.
In combining things that don't occupy the same theological space, they are both effectively cancelled out.
This is not an indictment of the proponent, but of the theory itself. So many verses are readily available to directly refute the myriad of mere anecdotal opinions which have no foundation in any kind of hermeneutical model that could be considered accepted by anything resembling what might constitute "God's seven thousand," that it's hard to imagine where to start challenging the enormous mass of conjecture.
The early and latter rain misapplication is particularly startling.
The latter rain is what matures the harvest (the end of the world) just before it is reaped (the Second coming of Jesus). So how can it represent conversion?
The early rain is that which causes the germination of the harvest (Pentecost and the early church). This is merely sensible and follows along with the agricultural parabolic motif which pervades the Bible. It requires no startling revelation or spiritual elitist vision to understand. This would be a much more cohesive interpretation of what is strangely being represented as a "spiritual" 2nd half of the 70th week of Daniel's prophecy, which has no foundation.
This is what always happens with folks who claim to have special light from God. When we hear the "God has shown me"-type claims, it's best to look for a train of fruits. Has any been offered in evidence? Is this elitist, schismatic message producing repentance, sorrow for sin, and reconciliation between man and God, and between man and his fellow man?
Unless we become as little children and seek the SIMPLE (not sensational) explanations that are common throughout Scripture, we cannot see the Kingdom of Heaven.
The prophecies foretelling God's revealed plans throughout the ages are so simple a child can (and should) understand them, so long as that child is not inclined to do wickedly, because the 12th chapter of Daniel is clear that the wicked shall NOT understand as the wise (being the opposite of the wicked in this context) SHALL understand. It's a perfectly logical construct from what we could presumably and/or loosely call "God's perspective."
The wicked simply aren't wise, and the meaning of "wicked," in the original tongues, or so I've been told, connotes a condition of being irregularly shaped, improper, or even confused or dysfunctional, none of which would describe a wise person.
And this would stand to reason for someone who struggles to get the big picture, so to speak, of the Bible or the Gospel. The scriptures are that which testifies of the personal Christ, not merely facts about the sum of the Bible's parts or that which piques our independent, individual interests.
Sophisticated, postmodern philosophies (even ones that are fashioned from the text of Scripture) are of no use to mankind, especially now more than any other time in history. People who are truly hungering and thirsting after righteousness have no use for a systematic theology that serves primarily to merely occupy their troubled hearts and minds. It must also heal.
What people need and, unbeknownst even to themselves, actually want (because of the measure of faith they are divinely dealt and the eternity God has placed in their hearts) is an audience with The Living Christ—an encounter that can permanently transform the experiences with, and views of, interpersonal relationships.
And these seeking ones won't settle for anything less, even if it looks like more.