Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I agree here.keras said:Serious studiers of the Bible prophesies know that there is yet to happen the last seven year period of Daniel 9:27.
I would disagree here. Haven't you been watching the news. Russia is everywhere in the media. I believe the Ezek 38-39 magog war will begin 3.5 years before the 70th week. They will be burning weapons for fuel for seven years, and then they will stop burning weapons at the middle of the 70th week and take their fuel into the wilderness Ezek 39:9 NIV.keras said:Then in Ezekiel 39:9 there is another seven year period, where those who will then inhabit the holy Land will clear the weapons of Gog's army. This makes 14 years at least between the next prophesied event, the Sixth Seal and the Return of Jesus. So from 2015, 15 to 20 years is as good a guess as any for the fulfillment of all the last days events. That will take us to about 2030 and the Return will be exactly 2000 years from the day Jesus commenced His ministry on earth.
Then why don't you cite some serious studiers, who are ALSO credentialed, along with their works?keras said:Serious studiers of the Bible prophesies know that there is yet to happen the last seven year period of Daniel 9:27. Then in Ezekiel 39:9 there is another seven year period, where those who will then inhabit the holy Land will clear the weapons of Gog's army. This makes 14 years at least between the next prophesied event, the Sixth Seal and the Return of Jesus. So from 2015, 15 to 20 years is as good a guess as any for the fulfillment of all the last days events.
That will take us to about 2030 and the Return will be exactly 2000 years from the day Jesus commenced His ministry on earth.
Would doing that convince you?StanJ said:Then why don't you cite some serious studiers, who are ALSO credentialed, along with their works?
Maybe, but you haven't even tried to.keras said:Would doing that convince you?
The proof is in Daniel 9:27, where he prophesies something that is yet to be fulfilled.
Re the 2000 years between the 2 Advents of Jesus.: He prophesied this gap in Luke 13:32 and Hosea 6:2, a day to God = 1000 years earth time.
Obviously NOT, if you can't show them.keras said:Stan, my proofs are in the Bible. I have yet to meet anyone or read any book that tells the whole truth of God's plan for His creation. What is said to us in Daniel 9:27, for example are things that cannot be said to have been completely fulfilled. There was actually a partial fulfilment in 160BC, but we know from 2 Thess. 2:4, the final fulfilment is yet to come.
Re the 1000 years = 1 day to God. Looking at the Hebrew and Greek in the Interlinear Scripture Analyser, we see that 'like' is not intended. Like is not used in the KJV. A definitive formula is given by two witnesses, not an airy-fairy, whatever you like to think, difference.
You are saying plain scripture can be allegorised and not taken for what is plainly said. A very tenuous and shaky belief.
You call scripture witnesses? I suspect ONLY to support your misinformed attempt to make scripture like Deut 19:15, Matt 18:16, & 2 Cor 13:1 analogous to your opinion. You would be wrong. Clearly witnesses are reputable people.keras said:I stand by the fact that two witnesses; Psalms 90:4, 2 Peter 3:7, both clearly state the formula of 1 day to God in heaven equals 1000 years on earth.
Do you want me to write a book on that subject? I could, but I try to keep my post on forums short, as I know anything over 2 paragraphs is often unread.
I did give two supporting verses: Hosea 6:2 and Luke 13:32.
Many denominations support the 7 Days of Creation, being a parallel for the 7 thousand year period of mankind. There was 4000 years from Adam to Jesus and we are now nearly at the end of 6000 years. Soon to come is the 1000 year reign of Jesus. Do you disagree with this?
NOT what I asked you.keras said:Yes, I do call the Prophets and the Apostles witnesses. Do you deny they are 'reputable people'?
As for taking any cognisance of what the commentators before, say 2010 wrote, you will only fall into the same errors as all of them. Daniel 12:9 states that the prophetic Words are to be kept secret until the time of the end. Obviously it wasn't the time of the end when they published and from the plethora of confused and different opinions, to try and gain the truth from them about the future is impossible.
Jesus said: No man knows the Day....Then in Luke 21:34-36 He says: we should be aware of the coming Day that will come suddenly, like a trap upon everyone the whole world over. Pray for the strength to stand firm on that Day, that The Lord will protect His people from all that is coming and so they will be able to stand in His presence.
Are you aware of what is coming? From what you say above, it seems you discount and ignore prophecy. 2 Peter 1:19 says it is good to study prophecy.
You continue to avoid a very simple and direct question.keras said:Do you want me to give out the names of my friends and fellow believers? Not likely!
Not everyone, just those who have chosen to believe false teachings. If I come across as a 'know it all', that is because I present the truth of the Bible. I am just a messenger.
Absolutely wrong! The Words are: That Day will come upon everyone that whole world over..... Proof of your delusion and error.
2 Peter 3:1-7 says that people like you will disbelieve what all the ancient prophets wrote about the forthcoming judgement of fire, instigated by Jesus. Hab. 3:12, Rom. 1:18
Again, avoiding a direct question. I don't question the Bible, I question your understanding and lack of proper exegesis.keras said:Anyone who disagrees with the truth of the Bible is wrong.
All who believe in a rapture to heaven of living people before the Lord sends His wrath upon the world, a theory that is nowhere prophesied or was ever part of God's plan, have been deceived by this false teaching. That is bad enough, but to actively promote and teach it yourself, places those who do that at risk of serious judgement. James 3:1
What 2 Peter 3:1-7 wrote is his words not mine. They aren't really hard to understand: people like I see here will scoff at the idea of a judgement of fire. They will treat what the prophets said as worthless, because they have already decided for themselves what they want God to do.
What will actually happen will come as a nasty shock to them.
Except when rabbi keras presents "THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE" - he re-writes Scripture!keras said:Anyone who disagrees with the truth of the Bible is wrong.
Why do you rewrite scripture. You did it with Isa 30:26.keras said:Anyone who disagrees with the truth of the Bible is wrong.
All who believe in a rapture to heaven of living people before the Lord sends His wrath upon the world, a theory that is nowhere prophesied or was ever part of God's plan, have been deceived by this false teaching. That is bad enough, but to actively promote and teach it yourself, places those who do that at risk of serious judgement. James 3:1
What 2 Peter 3:1-7 wrote is his words not mine. They aren't really hard to understand: people like I see here will scoff at the idea of a judgement of fire. They will treat what the prophets said as worthless, because they have already decided for themselves what they want God to do.
What will actually happen will come as a nasty shock to them.
Do your three Bible quotes actually say God will take live people to live in heaven? As I know they don't, then why do you believe such a thing will happen?StanJ said:Again, avoiding a direct question. I don't question the Bible, I question your understanding and lack of proper exegesis.
If you don't get 1 Cor 15:50-58, or 1 Thess 4:13-18, or Luke 17:34-37, you NEVER will.
Peter used the word LIKE, not IS. I don't know what else you refer to. You often get very equivocal and obfuscative when addressing direct questions....NOT what a teacher who actually has truth to teach does.