Waiting on him
Well-Known Member
In the epistle to the Hebrews the author was petitioning God to remove them from their doctrin of baptisms.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I just mentioned it because it seemed to be a mockery of their traditions, while at the same time illustrates a transformation an internal one.
In the epistle to the Hebrews the author was petitioning God to remove them from their doctrin of baptisms.
What are the concepts or the is the definition of Legalism?
Oops! His the wrong button lolBasically? It's this:
Romans 11:
17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;
21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
And teachings, beliefs, preaching's, from people who have been "cut off" and either don't/can't see. don't can't, or are willingly ignorant that they have been!
Hebrews 6 is written to Jews that would rather sink in the mud of their traditions.Good morning WOH;
Believe what you are saying is correct, if you look at it as an illustration. (Going to write my thoughts out if you would like to read them)
If you are talking about Mark 7 in response to what is being said by the Lord Jesus Christ, the Scribes and Pharisees liked to be acknowledged with-in the marketplace, and enjoyed sitting in the most important seats in the house and being praised by others.
So Yeshua, is telling them -> Though you look holy on the outside -> On the inside that comes from our heart unto out of our mouth speaks volumes of the darkness with-in us. Because Yeshua talks about how out of the thoughts of the heart, evil things emerge.
The only way to have that cleaned from with-in seems by the bible to indicate having faith, belief, trust in God and the Lord Jesus Christ.
(For an example a man in a jungle falls in sinking mud, - A man comes up to Him and says its gonna change you but can not help you though keep your head up even though you are sinking and walks away) - A worldly example of change.
Yeshua Christ comes along to the sinking man and literally dives with-in the mud, and pushes the man out back unto the land to safety. - Still a worldly example however -> this is happening by faith and trusting in God who gives to the Lord Jesus Christ the holy spirit/spirit of Christ which is delivered to us by faith given, and we are transformed in our minds and hearts. A heavenly example of change - being transformed by Christ Jesus and the word of God.
Are you talking about Hebrews Chapter 6:1-3? What do you think about these scriptures?
What are the concepts or the is the definition of Legalism?
.
Legalism..... is when a person has substituted anything for the BLood of Jesus, = their SELF Effort, to do for themselves, only what The Blood Of Jesus Can Do.
if you want to hear legalistic self saving explained day after day, then read anything posted by :
wrangler
justbyfaith
ferris bueller
Hello Behold,
Thank you for your insight and view points here. :)
What are the concepts or the is the definition of Legalism?
Hello Robert,
You know you are probably right about this as far as our national holidays celebrated here in America, these are the only two concepts that can think of when it comes down to tradition that has been passed down through the years.
Believe Enoch111, shared even more detailed insight to some traditions, that are held by men, this could even wave out even into the idea of traditions using the bible that involve indoctrination of a individual into those things of a cult.
Here is what Enoch111, had to say here below. You have any more thoughts on these things?
Thank you for your post, Robert.
If you are talking about Mark 7 in response to what is being said by the Lord Jesus Christ, the Scribes and Pharisees liked to be acknowledged with-in the marketplace, and enjoyed sitting in the most important seats in the house and being praised by others.
The traditions of the apostles were in fact teachings handed down to them by Christ. They in turn handed them down to the Christians within the apostolic churches, and also wrote them down so that we would know that they were.Paul praised them for keeping traditions.
I would offer to look at the portion of scripture when the word of God was first written by the finger of God establishing his tradition as it is written. I think you could say the foundation of establishing tradtions as laws not sunject to change .
God proptecting the integrity of His word using two witnesses two tablets .Two is used that way to represnt the one withness of God in respect to Him and His Son or Christ and his bride throughout the Bible .
The first mention God hews out the stone and writes His thoughts with his finger. I would think to show he is not served by human hands in any way shape or form . Coming down from the mountain . . . the traditions of men simply made the word of God to no effect. They had no desire to believe in that tradition. Etched in stone.
The second step in the written tradition was for Moses to hew out the new tablets and again God wrote with his finger the words on both sides leaving no room . . Moses having part in the tradition of God but not the author of the words.
We could say how beautiful are the feet of the apostle Moses . . .shod with the gospel the law of love .
Exodus 31: 18 And he gave unto Moses, when he had made an end of communing with him upon mount Sinai, two tables of testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God.
The tables were written on both their sides. No room for the oral tradition I heard it through the grape vine of men
Exodus 32: 14-16 And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people. And Moses turned, and went down from the mount, and the two tables of the testimony were in his hand: the tables were written on both their sides; on the one side and on the other were they written. And the tables were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, graven upon the tables.
Exodus 34 King James Version (KJV) And the Lord said unto Moses, Hew thee two tables of stone like unto the first: and I will write upon these tables the words that were in the first tables, which thou brakest.
2nd, I would say legalism is not quite what Behold said. What he's calling legalism is merely the false doctrine Once Saved, Always Saved.
Its interesting that a legalist believes that giving Credit to Christ for keeping the born again saved, is something that Christ's blood does not complete.
Your use of language is obtuse. I'm OK with the notion of Christ's blood 'completing'
Im the one here who is teaching ...
You are teaching Once Saved, Always Saved.
You are teaching Once Saved, Always Saved. I’m quoting Scripture, Matthew 7:21, which does not support OSAS.