Earnest T Bass said:
Here is the core error of your belief system in that your are trying to substitute faith onlyism for what the Bible teaches about obedience.
I don't teach salvation by "faith only" (James 2:24) which is an
empty profession of faith/dead faith that remains barren of works. (James 2:14) Not to be confused with "salvation through faith (rightly understood) in Christ alone (Romans 4:5-6) which results in producing works. (Ephesians 2:10) The core error of your belief system is that you are trying to substitute salvation by works for what the Bible teaches about salvation through faith, not works and you also seem to believe that all faith is the same "except for the lack of works" and cannot grasp a
deeper faith which
trusts in Jesus Christ alone for salvation, which also explains why you have so much faith in works for salvation. Saving faith is belief, trust, reliance in Jesus Christ for salvation and obedience which "follows" is "works." You just can't figure that out and there is a reason for that.
---Obedience to Christ is how one is saved....Paul said in Rom 6:16 "obedience unto righteousness" hence no obedience to God leaves one UNRIGHTEOUS and lost for no verse teaches disobedience unto righteousness.
More eisegesis on your part. In regard to Romans 6:16, I've noticed that works-salvationists (such as yourself) typically ignore
"servants of obedience unto righteousness" (Romans 6:16) and simply stress "obedience unto righteousness" as if works of obedience which "follow" saving faith in Christ are "unto righteousness," as if we are saved by works. Your error culminates in works salvation.
In regard to Romans 6:16, there is a
contrast here between servants. There are only two kinds of servants in this world, in the spiritual sense -
"servants of sin unto death," or
"servants of obedience unto righteousness." When we place our faith in Jesus Christ for salvation/believe the gospel by trusting in His finished work of redemption as the ALL-sufficient means of our salvation, we then become
"servants of obedience unto righteousness." Being servants of sin is put in the past tense. Paul goes on in Romans 6:18 -
"You have been set free from sin and have become servants of righteousness."
*Notice in Romans 10:10 - For with the heart one
believes unto righteousness..
*Notice in Romans 4:5 - But to him who does not work but
believes on Him who justifies the ungodly,
his faith (not works)
is accounted for righteousness.
No verse teaches God unconditionally saves/seals the person who continually lives in rebellion to Him.
This is an oxymoron and a straw man argument because those who are born of God do not continually live in rebellion to God. (1 John 3:7-10) God conditionally seals a person upon believing the gospel and they remain sealed unto the day of redemption. (Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30)
Obedience is how one goes about receiving grace.
Is that what Paul said in Romans 5:1-2? NO. Romans 5:1 - Therefore, having been
justified by faith, (and obedience/works? NO. Simply faith) we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 through whom also we have
access by faith into this grace (and obedience/works? NO. Simply faith) in which we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. The act of obedience that saves is the obedient act of choosing to believe the gospel. Romans 10:16 - But they have not all
obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has
believed our report?” Let me know when you are ready to believe the gospel. (Romans 1:16)
---you refuse to acknowledge that obedience to God and works of merit are two completely different things.
If obedience to God through doing good works after one has been saved through faith was the basis or means by which we are saved, then that would be works of merit. As I already explained, you can't have it both ways. Your "works based" false gospel is not obedience to God.
You have never, will never, show one example from the Bible where a person's obedience to God (as Noah obediently building the ark) is called a work of merit whereby that person earned God's favor thereby God owed that person for their obedience.
Noah had already "found grace" (Genesis 6:8), was "a preacher of righteousness" (2 Peter 2:5), and "walked with God"
before he built the ark. His obedience was a
demonstration of his faith and not the origin of it. Building the ark demonstrated that Noah believed God about flooding the earth and the ark saved Noah and his family (physically) from drowning. (Hebrews 11:17) If Noah would have refused to build the ark, then he would have demonstrated a lack of faith in what God told him about flooding the earth, but of course, that was not the case.
This why being sealed under both the OT and NT laws was conditional upon obedience to God.
As I already showed you that in contrast to this
permanent indwelling in the New Testament, the indwelling in the Old Testament was
selective and temporary. The Holy Spirit “came upon” such Old Testament people as Joshua (Numbers 27:18), David (1 Samuel 16:12-13) and Saul (1 Samuel 10:10). In the book of Judges, we see the Holy Spirit “coming upon” these various judges whom God raised up to deliver Israel from their oppressors. The Holy Spirit
did not permanently indwell them/seal them, but instead,
came upon these individuals for specific tasks. So, while in the New Testament the Holy Spirit
only indwells believers and that indwelling is permanent, (Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30) the Holy Spirit
came upon certain individuals in the Old Testament for a
specific task and not to permanently seal them in Christ. Your conditional upon obedience to God culminates in salvation by works.
This is why the Jews, who were God's chosen, yet were cast off for they did not obey (Rom 11)
The Israelites were in the olive tree to begin with because they were the "natural branches" and not because they were all saved. Because of their unbelief and hard hearts God removed His gracious hand from them as a people overall and broke them off from His goodness (but only for a time after which they will be restored - Romans 11:24-26). Nothing here about disobedient believers being cast off.
and the same for the congregation in Ephesus, Rev 2.
I already thoroughly explained this to you in post #51. In regard to the church in Ephesus in Revelation 2, clearly the Lord wanted the church at Ephesus to repent - to change their minds regarding their works. "You have left your first love" (verse 4). "Repent and do the first works" (verse 5). Works of love no longer characterized the church as a whole in Ephesus. In verses 2 and 6, we see that the church in Ephesus was not totally displeasing to the Lord, yet hating the deeds of the Nicolaitans and standing up for doctrinal purity still cannot be a substitute for love. So, what did the Lord mean when He spoke of removing the church's lampstand if the church in Ephesus did not repent? The removal of the lampstand is clearly figurative language. This does not mean that individuals in the church at Ephesus will lose their salvation, but the church can forfeit its place of light bearing and witness. Ephesus (located in modern day Turkey) in which the vast majority of Turkey is Islam. Go figure.
CONTINUED...