That's a common tactic of people exposed, claim indignation by the charges as an excuse not to answer the charges.
Well, to prove this, you would have to show me where I haven't answered anyone else. I'm not averse to answering people's arguments, here or elsewhere. I just don't like to entertain someone being insulting, as if simply passing it over as acceptable. You may mock me for it, but in your case my honest concern is more with your spiritual condition than worrying about any debate over a vulture analogy. That takes precedence here, and I had already taken stock and judged that even if you accused me of being unable to answer you, I had a greater responsibility where that was concerned than worrying about how I might be viewed.
Yeah, I know, you don't consider yourself a pretribber, but you still tell their lies, because you're still defending false doctrines that are mostly the same as pretribber doctrine.
On this text, yes. But you don't want to do that with people. It's a form of bearing false witness. Anyone who reads that and doesn't know me very well might assume I actually am Pre-Trib, and that would be misleading.
1) "Where" is an irrelevant question to Jesus' comment about false Christs, any other supposed Christ is false.
Jesus' purpose was to warn them that false Christs would be coming, and that people would say "Lo, here," or "Lo, there," and not to follow them. Why would He be taking the time to warn them about it and command them not to follow them if there was nothing to be concerned about here? He said in Mathew 24:24 that these false Christs would perform miracles powerful enough to deceive, if it were possible, even the very elect. But it was not because Jesus was exposing what Satan's strategy would be in advance, saying "Behold, I have told you before." (v.25).
2) In the parallel passage, Jesus did say where for reasons of illustration, and it wasn't in answer to anyone's question.
I explained this one in the OP.
When they were asking "Where Lord?" in Luke 17:37, what they actually wanted to know is "Where will these false christs manifest themselves, Lord?" This is evident by comparing the texts. But if you'll notice, in Luke's account Jesus never says anything about "the wilderness" or "the secret chambers" yet; only that some will say, "Lo, He is here," or "Lo, He is there." He instead skips straight to talking about how they will know the real Christ has come:
"And they will say to you, 'Lo, here,' or 'Lo, there.' Do not go forth nor follow. For as the lightning which lights up the sky shines from under [one side of] the heaven to under [the other side of] heaven, so also will be the Son of man [do so] in His day." (Luke 17:23)
It is by comparing both accounts that we see more of the full progression of how the conversation originally went. He originally told them merely that some would say "He is here," or "He is there," to which they asked, "Where, Lord?" (i.e. "Where will they say the Christ is?"). After they asked this, Jesus apparently then gave more specifics as recored in Matthew's account: In the wilderness or in the secret chambers.
By comparing the texts, my argument is that He was saying it in answer to their question. Do you believe they are parallel passages on the same discourse, or no?
3) In context, the disciples asked where people would be taken. The contest says they "answered" Jesus when he said one would be take and another one left.
You're arguing that the disciples were not asking a question? All the manuscripts have a question mark in this verse.
4) In the parallel passage, Jesus gives a stronger explanation to those taken, they'd be taken to where there is a gnashing of teeth.
Gnashing of teeth? You mean in Matthew 24:51? By this point He is giving a teaching to the disciples on what would become of them if they were poor stewards over His house. By moving into Matthew 24:42-51, you appear to be claiming that the thief in v.43 is Jesus and that he will come to "steal" the wicked away for some reason. Why would He use an analogy of stealing the wicked away, as if they were something He desired?
5) It's not legitimate to pick "where" out of context, as you did and move it to another position in a parallel passage.
Here is the only argument you make that holds a little water, but the NT is actually full of examples of such instances where a statement made a verse or two later is actually referencing back farther than the end of the verse it is contained in. Colossians 2:16-17 is another instance. It's just the way they wrote back then. How are you interpreting Matthew 24:28 in its context? If you consider them to be parallel passages, how do you interpret the expression in both texts?
6) If "When?" was vague, it's by far most reasonable that the disciples would want to know where people are taken, not where false Christs would appear.
I think you meant "Where?", or am I misunderstanding you? This one seems to be a repeat of your previous question.
7) Jesus also equates those "taken" with those "swept away" in the flood and with those killed in Sodom.
For this I would refer you to Posts #27 and #39.
8) There's no indication whatsoever that those taken are raptured.
You do believe Matthew 24:31 is about the rapture, yes? This is couched between Matthew 24:23-28 and Matthew 24:36-41. It is all part of the same discourse.