It is noticeable in their system today.Evidence???
I know, I was once an RCC'er.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It is noticeable in their system today.Evidence???
That documentation???It is noticeable in their system today.
I know, I was once an RCC'er.
Using the same vocabulary of reclamation, Constantine acquired several more sites of Christian significance in the Holy Land for the purpose of constructing churches. Most of these sites had been "polluted" by pagan shrines and needed "desacrilization" or deconsecration before they could be used.[41]:39,40 (The practice of "cleansing" a sacred site of its previous spiritual influences was not limited to Christians.) According to Bayliss, the historical writings of Prudentius indicate the deconsecration of a temple merely required the removal of the cult statue and altar.[41]:39,40 However, this was often extended to the removal or even destruction of other statues and icons, votive stelae and all other internal imagery and decoration. Such objects were not always destroyed, some were desacralized or "cleansed" by having crosses chiseled onto them and perhaps a rite performed over them.That documentation???
and not only do you have no historical evidence you have no scriptural evidence
Using the same vocabulary of reclamation, Constantine acquired several more sites of Christian significance in the Holy Land for the purpose of constructing churches. Most of these sites had been "polluted" by pagan shrines and needed "desacrilization" or deconsecration before they could be used.[41]:39,40 (The practice of "cleansing" a sacred site of its previous spiritual influences was not limited to Christians.) According to Bayliss, the historical writings of Prudentius indicate the deconsecration of a temple merely required the removal of the cult statue and altar.[41]:39,40 However, this was often extended to the removal or even destruction of other statues and icons, votive stelae and all other internal imagery and decoration. Such objects were not always destroyed, some were desacralized or "cleansed" by having crosses chiseled onto them and perhaps a rite performed over them.
Religious policies of Constantine the Great - Wikipedia
....as he preached Acts 2:38 in his foundational message, which the RCC disagrees with.So we’re back to the one true church founded by Christ on Peter
Yes. He turned Pagan Rome into the Pagan RCC.so Constantine was pope cos of sacred images in Catholic Churches?
....as he preached Acts 2:38 in his foundational message, which the RCC disagrees with.
Yes. He turned Pagan Rome into the Pagan RCC.
Yes. He turned Pagan Rome into the Pagan RCC.
Using the same vocabulary of reclamation, Constantine acquired several more sites of Christian significance in the Holy Land for the purpose of constructing churches. Most of these sites had been "polluted" by pagan shrines and needed "desacrilization" or deconsecration before they could be used.[41]:39,40 (The practice of "cleansing" a sacred site of its previous spiritual influences was not limited to Christians.) According to Bayliss, the historical writings of Prudentius indicate the deconsecration of a temple merely required the removal of the cult statue and altar.[41]:39,40 However, this was often extended to the removal or even destruction of other statues and icons, votive stelae and all other internal imagery and decoration. Such objects were not always destroyed, some were desacralized or "cleansed" by having crosses chiseled onto them and perhaps a rite performed over them.
Religious policies of Constantine the Great - Wikipedia
What a stupid statement. Your wiki link doesn't prove this. Try reading it. A pagan "RCC" ratified all the books of the Bible in the 4th century??? Seriously??? If what you say is true then the Bible is a pagan book! "He turned Pagan Rome into the Pagan RCC" is a hateful lie supported by the JW's, the Mormons, the SDA, and ignorant fundamentalists. Reputable Protestant historians stopped teaching this lunacy because it doesn't withstand scholarly scrutiny.Yes. He turned Pagan Rome into the Pagan RCC.
Acts 2:38 is the fulfillment of Matt 28:19, which you reject.we good with baptism obeying Matt 28:19
LOLsacred images are not pagan and not forbidden
Approved by the holy apostles in the 2nd council of nicea
Per the link, your founder Constantine got the unity of the pagans, Jews and Christians into harmony.What a stupid statement. Your wiki link doesn't prove this. Try reading it. A pagan "RCC" ratified all the books of the Bible in the 4th century??? Seriously??? If what you say is true then the Bible is a pagan book! "He turned Pagan Rome into the Pagan RCC" is a hateful lie supported by the JW's, the Mormons, the SDA, and ignorant fundamentalists. Reputable Protestant historians stopped teaching this lunacy because it doesn't withstand scholarly scrutiny.
13 LOGICAL PROBLEMS WITH THE CONSTANTINE FOUNDER MYTH
Myth: Constantine started the Catholic Church | (catholicbryan.org)
Is Catholicism Pagan? | Catholic Answers
This destroys your historical revisionism, a nice way of saying LIES. Baptist mythology is an embarrassment to Baptists.
Acts 2:38 is the fulfillment of Matt 28:19, which you reject.
Peter is not your founding church father.
Constantine is.
Amen.Only Christ has authority to found the church
Amen.
He gave Peter the keys in Matt 16 to open the door for the Jew first at Acts 2:38, the Samaritans at Acts 8 and the Gentiles at Acts 10.
Having the keys made him "the man".
Mmmm. Are you familiar with how the council of Trent was concluded and the sermon by the bishop Reggio? The conclusions thereof destroy your defense.The Church has never pretended that its Authority reaches "over and above" Scripture.
It is in harmony with it.
As I showed you in my last post - the Authority given Christ's Church is GOD-given - and it is supreme earthly Authority.
"WHATEVER" His Church declares held bound or loosed on earth is held bound or loosed in Heaven (Matt. 16:18-19, 18:15-18, John 20:21-23). NOT because the Church says so but because it is guided by the Holy Spirit to ALL Truth (John 16:12-15). It is the Holy Spirit making these declarations through His Church - not men acting on their own.
If there have been sinful men in the history of the Church - that's on THEM - not the Holy Spirit.
And EVERY group has them - including yours . . .
The latter is correct.there’s three kingdoms of heaven?
or I give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven
Mmmm. Are you familiar with how the council of Trent was concluded and the sermon by the bishop Reggio? The conclusions thereof destroy your defense.