Never said He did, I have no idea where you got that from, you do ramble on.Christ came to condemn no one, mjr,
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Never said He did, I have no idea where you got that from, you do ramble on.Christ came to condemn no one, mjr,
i agree, He did, quite openly, condemn all of the leaders of the Established church of His day, who had led the Israelites astray.mjrhealth said:Jesus already did that,
Actually no, they condemend themsleves by there unbelief pride and arrogance as many men do., condemn
Are you sure? All of them? See that in this way, because you claim belief in Christ, you in essence close yourself to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees.Heb 13:8 said:The Pharisees are not believers in Christ.
All of them. They were religious zealots bro.bbyrd009 said:Are you sure? All of them? See that in this way, because you claim belief in Christ, you in essence close yourself to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees.
This cannot apply, now, to anyone who claims to believe in Christ, then. So with one, bold stroke, that verse is now inapplicable to anyone who claims Christian,
as is any other reflection applicable to Pharisees, symbologically. Spiritually, iow. So then, i cannot be a hypocrite, because i am not a Pharisee.
And what, after all, is the leaven of the Pharisees?
Ya--well legal ones, anyway. Shades of Job, hmm...and, shades of Paul, too.Heb 13:8 said:All of them. They were religious zealots bro.
..But because of the Pharisees they would not openly acknowledge their faith for fear they would be put out of the synagogue; 43for they loved human praise more than praise from God.bbyrd009 said:Ya--well legal ones, anyway. Shades of Job, hmm...and, shades of Paul, too.
42 Nevertheless, many did believe in Him even among the rulers...
yes, i purposely cut that part off, because that does not imo mean that no Pharisees did not believe, just "because the Pharisees," meaning as a body, persecuted those who believed Christ. Now, you could argue that that is not true, and say that "because the Pharisees" by definition means that no Pharisee leader could possibly have believed in Christ, in their heart, but we even have some testimony by some leaders, which i would have to go see which sect they belonged to, they were Sanhedrin anyway, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was no actual "proof" of any passage where a stated Pharisee said they believed Christ, strictly to make the matter revealing of peoples' hearts, in the decision. Imo it's kind of like saying that because i'm a cop, i can't break the law.Heb 13:8 said:..But because of the Pharisees they would not openly acknowledge their faith for fear they would be put out of the synagogue; 43for they loved human praise more than praise from God.
If you're a Pharisee that has come to believe then you're no longer a Pharisee by definition. You're a believer.bbyrd009 said:yes, i purposely cut that part off, because that does not imo mean that no Pharisees did not believe, just "because the Pharisees," meaning as a body, persecuted those who believed Christ. Now, you could argue that that is not true, and say that "because the Pharisees" by definition means that no Pharisee leader could possibly have believed in Christ, in their heart, but we even have some testimony by some leaders, which i would have to go see which sect they belonged to, they were Sanhedrin anyway, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was no actual "proof" of any passage where a stated Pharisee said they believed Christ, strictly to make the matter revealing of peoples' hearts, in the decision. Imo it's kind of like saying that because i'm a cop, i can't break the law.
So, if you insist "No Pharisee could, by definition, have accepted Christ," then i can't prove you are wrong, but it strikes me as demanding an absolute, to force a point, perhaps. When the truth is surely on a bell curve, right.
so then, if i am a cop who has come to break a law, and say maybe i smoke pot now, or whatever, by definition i am no longer a cop.Heb 13:8 said:If you're a Pharisee that has come to believe then you're no longer a Pharisee by definition. You're a believer.
A cop is a cop because they passed a test or two and had gone through training. A believer is a believer because of their faith in the finished work of the cross. Are you comparing a cop test to the blood of Christ?bbyrd009 said:so then, if i am a cop who has come to break a law, and say maybe i smoke pot now, or whatever, by definition i am no longer a cop.
You mean Saul of whom Christ saidPaul
Is that all you can see?mjrhealth said:You mean Saul of whom Christ said
Act 9:4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
because he was killing christians?? I guess he wasnt that good was he.
No but it took a "revelation" for His eyes to be opened, because He was blind, but when Chirst opened His eyes he could see.Is that all you can see?