Not true. The premise is false.
Omniscience (all knowing) does not negate the choice God gives to each. That God knows what will be chosen at each point, does not negate the fact that a choice was given. God knows the choices. The persons choosing do not know until they choose.
Hi Adventageous
I submit that it is your premise that is astray here.
A choice can not exist if there are no options to choose from. If there are universal forces in play that determine that a given event will 100% happen then there can not be any choice in that event. For there to exist free will, and thus free choice, it MUST BY DEFINITION mean that God can not know in advance what the choice will be. The very second that God knows in advance what the choice will be we can then determine that there MUST exist forces in play that are determining that outcome, for otherwise it could not possibly be known in advance. What those forces are is not relevant. It could be that God can see the infinite intricacies of "cause and effect" of every atom in the universe and can compute it all and thus can see what will happen in the future. i.e. not some mysterious woo-science ability but simple physics and chemistry and real science. It could alternatively be that God sits outside time and that everything has already happened and God can view all past history and all future events like watching a film, being able to fast forward or rewind at will. But if this is the case, if everything HAS already happened, then once again there is no free choice. The choices have already happened and we are somehow just experiencing a slot in time as our human experience.
Any way we slice and dice this the fundamental problem remains. The only way a choice can be free, the only way a choice can be a real, is if no-one at all, not even God, can know the outcome before it happens.
Thus we have a fundamental problem with our concept of God and our lives. Either our thinking that God is Omniscient is totally incorrect, or our belief that we have free will and free choice is incorrect. The former seems more likely imo.