covenantee
Well-Known Member
So poor Paul is lost forevermore. If only you'd been there to warn him.After reading my post, obviously Paul does.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So poor Paul is lost forevermore. If only you'd been there to warn him.After reading my post, obviously Paul does.
There is no "contemporary" or otherwise with God's Word. Well, unless you consider it all contemporary, regardless of any time reference, which is true in the case of God, the great I AM, and His Word, which stands/endures forever.You didn't get the contemporary reference. That's sad.
That because it's simply a made-up doctrine of men, mainly Jews who still think they are exalted over all other Christians.Replacement theology is unable to be sustained by properly applied scriptures.
When you and your kind point your finger at "the Jews", and belittle "ethnic Israel", and all the other garbage false corrupt racist provision that reworks God's words that follows, because the full truth counters that racist Satanic argument, the finger of God is pointing at those serpents,whose father is the Devil.
And their taking afront at being identified by we indwelt eternally redeemed in Christ Christians who recognize the JEWISH Messiah,are not concerned with the sulphurous breath that belches outrage when the racist antisemitic are exposed and say they're upset about that.
![]()
Incorrect.That because it's simply a made-up doctrine of men, mainly Jews who still think they are exalted over all other Christians.
After reading my post, obviously Paul does.
You refer to Gentiles identifying with their country of origin. The New Testament does not.
Thanks Paul.There is no "contemporary" or otherwise with God's Word. Well, unless you consider it all contemporary, regardless of any time reference, which is true in the case of God, the great I AM, and His Word, which stands/endures forever.
Grace and peace to you.
My FB nephew has aTrust the science..lol
John 1:3, Peterlag, says ~ and again, I'm quoting ~ "All things were made through Him, and without Him was not any thing made that was made." All things means all things, Peterlag, not, somehow, "all things except for one thing."It does not say all things were made by Jesus in John 1:3.
In effect it does, because in John 1:14, John says, "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us," and then in verses 15 through 18, finally names Him, specifically at the end of verse 17.The verse does not say "In the beginning was Jesus."
Not in definition, no, but they all irrefutably refer to the same Person, giving us a full picture of Who He is, His relationship to and with the Father, and His unmatchable qualities and attributes.The "Word" is not synonymous with Jesus, or even the "Messiah."
Yeah I say much the same. Thanks Paul. And Peter. And Isaiah. And a host of others. But really, thanks be to God, Who is really the Author of His Word.Thanks Paul.
Those whom He hath called are not Christians?Let's look at the first verse in the number one spot that you give which is...
Romans 9:24
Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
The word Christian is not mentioned in this verse.
He called Jews and Gentiles to be Christian. He did not call Christians to be Jewish Christians. And He did not call certain people because the New Testament has places where it talks about those who God called. I think God called everyone and only certain people answered the call. In Ephesians 1:4, it says God chose us in Christ beforehand, and in Revelation 17:8, it says certain names have been written in a book from the foundation of the world. It's the group, the body of Christ that is foreordained from the foundation of the world, and not specific individuals selected by God for salvation.Those whom He hath called are not Christians?
What is the difference between those whom He hath called, and Christians?
John 1:14John 1:3, Peterlag, says ~ and again, I'm quoting ~ "All things were made through Him, and without Him was not any thing made that was made." All things means all things, Peterlag, not, somehow, "all things except for one thing."
In effect it does, because in John 1:14, John says, "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us," and then in verses 15 through 18, finally names Him, specifically at the end of verse 17.
Not in definition, no, but they all irrefutably refer to the same Person, giving us a full picture of Who He is, His relationship to and with the Father, and His unmatchable qualities and attributes.
Grace and peace to you.
Because when we read the Scriptures we need to interpret the meaning as the words are used in the text. When and where we start adding all kinds of our ideas will be the day there will be nothing left of the Scriptures. When God says the saints He does not mean Jews. When He says the church of God in the New Testament He does not mean Gentiles.And that's a problem because???
The verse does not say that He did.He did not call Christians to be Jewish Christians.
Because when we read the Scriptures we need to interpret the meaning as the words are used in the text. When and where we start adding all kinds of our ideas will be the day there will be nothing left of the Scriptures. When God says the saints He does not mean Jews. When He says the church of God in the New Testament He does not mean Gentiles.
It's not a matter of it agreeing with me. It's a matter of not agreeing with God since that language of "Gentile Christians" is not mentioned in the New Testament.I don't know from where you arrive at your doctrine! Nothing is taken away or added to Scripture by using the phrase "Gentile Christians"! That is in fact what all who are of faith but are not Jews are called, even if that truth does not explicitly agree with you.
It's not a matter of it agreeing with me. It's a matter of not agreeing with God since that language of "Gentile Christians" is not mentioned in the New Testament.
If Gentiles are saved then they are no longer Gentiles is the language the Bible is using. It's a big deal because without guys like me there will be guys like you posting data about Romans 11 and saying it's about Christians when the subject matter is not about Christians.Yes, that language is mentioned throughout the New Testament. Just because we don't find the explicit phrase "Gentile Christians" does not mean there is no mention of Gentiles being saved and called Christians. That's why it seems very bizarre to some of us as to why you are making this mountain out of such a tiny mole hill?