Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Gal 1:6-9
Believers weigh in on both sides of this issue.
That was a Chinese translation I read a long time ago. It contained certain content, but I'm not sure if it's included in the English version's translation.
What a ridiculous post.
I'm about 50/50 on whether it was meant to be humour. Ridiculousness may have been intended
The most absurd reason is that, if there were no Satan, what do you think humans are? good or evil? Why do we have differences because of the existence of Satan? Can salvation be treated differently?
I've been recovering from major surgery for the last month, so it has taken me time to respond.
Sorry to hear of your physical battle. We are approaching Mayo's shortly and I have appointments scheduled starting tomorrow.
I'm not sure where you're getting that. I do not believe that. The Russian orthodox was the first split from the Latin church of Rome and the Greek church of Constantinople AKA the catholic church (lower case c). But it was a 'small' rejection against the 'one catholic church'. One which the Eastern and Western declared as being because of false doctrine from the Russians. So basically 'the catholics' considered the Russian loss as a 'good riddance' from 'them' who considered themselves as the true church.
Not my understanding totally. The schism was beginning with the ROME church going TO LEAVENED BREAD during communion. That transition started in 900 AD and was finished in 11,00 AD. The church had never celebrated communion with unleavened bread. They used the same bread JESUS used in the Last Supper. And it was your icon here, it was the bread of LIFE used, and not the bread of death....which did not have the air of life in it. Just check the Greek word for "bread" and it is ARTOS; defined as being "a RAISED loaf." The Eastern orthodox has used LEAVENED bread for 2,000 years.
They saw the light...they saw the light!!! And they believed clear back when Augustine was still admitting the WESTERN church of ROME was still debating about the doctrine. 
Thanks - but it ws actually a happy occasion. I got a nuch-needed kidney transplant.
For your information - the bread that Jesus used at the Lat Supper was UNLEAVENED bread.I'm not sure where you're getting that. I do not believe that. The Russian orthodox was the first split from the Latin church of Rome and the Greek church of Constantinople AKA the catholic church (lower case c). But it was a 'small' rejection against the 'one catholic church'. One which the Eastern and Western declared as being because of false doctrine from the Russians. So basically 'the catholics' considered the Russian loss as a 'good riddance' from 'them' who considered themselves as the true church.
Not my understanding totally. The schism was beginning with the ROME church going TO LEAVENED BREAD during communion. That transition started in 900 AD and was finished in 11,00 AD. The church had never celebrated communion with unleavened bread. They used the same bread JESUS used in the Last Supper. And it was your icon here, it was the bread of LIFE used, and not the bread of death....which did not have the air of life in it. Just check the Greek word for "bread" and it is ARTOS; defined as being "a RAISED loaf." The Eastern orthodox has used LEAVENED bread for 2,000 years.
But I agree with you that the POPE issue was the last straw, that finally broke the back of the one church into the GREAT SCHISM.
Ummm, can you point me to the post where I called YOU and "Idiot"??
Wow kidney transplant, that's a big one. I have a video you really need to watch. It's a totally medical based information. But It concerns what you should be looking out for in the soul realm with organ transplants from other people.
Your biblical information source is absent, concerning the night of the last supper.
My apologies BOL. You are right and I am sorry for my error. I was remembering wrongly and then, when I went back to find the post I also read it wrongly. It was Behold's quote you were addressing in post 319.
I don't care WHAT the Greek word for “Bread” is. The command by God to Moses to use UNLEAVENED bread was written in Hebrew.
And I don't care what the Hebrew word for "bread", was used in the OT. The command by Jesus to the apostles writing the gospels, was to use LEAVENED bread in the GREEK new testament.
According to scripture the apostles though JUDAS was going out to BUY what they needed to celebrate the DAY of PASSOVER which was 3 days after the night of the last supper.
Go back and read again what I said. I didn't even know what church you went to BOL, that's why I asked the question. I have done my research and I KNOW your church and the EASTERN ORTHODOX have both used wine for 2,000 years. So still do most denominations all over the world. It is the USA who dropped WINE from their menu at communion. And do yoou know WHEN? In the 1800s. And do you know why? Because of the TEMPERANCE movement against all alcoholic beverages. And do you know what they went to instead of WINE? They went to not even REAL grape juice. Do you know why? Because REAL grape juice is LIVING and will ferment, even with refrigeration. So Dr. WELCH, a dentist, who heard about a new process of KILLING germs by pasteurization (Lous Pasteur), He used that same process to KILL living fermentation. And Dr. WELCH also saw a money making opportunity to invent WELCH'S GRAPE DRINK. While grape juice is common in some American evangelical circles, its use is rare in Europe. That's the sum of my "homework" on wine BOL.
WHERE did Jesus tell the Ap[stles to use "Leavened bread" for the Passover??
I never said that we didn't. But I ALSO never saud that the Cathollic Church went into "apostasy" by changing over to unleavened bread as YOU stated in post #357.
IF you took your studies seriously - you wouldn't have made many of the foolish statements that you have in this conversation.
NOWHERE does it say that they ate leavened bread at the Passover.
I know ALL about why grape juoice bagan beng used in many Protestant sects - and that grape juice begins to ferment the moment the grape is crushed. I wrote an entire article on the subject. However - ths has NOTHING to do with our conversation.
Ummm - in post #350, it way YOU who brought up the whole converstion of Communion and which bread to use . . .
No where does it say that Jesus told them to use leavened OR unleavened. And you never addressed when the apostles who were eating the bread they were eating though Judas was going out to buy what was needed for the Passover Day 3 days later.
I don't know what Strong's concordance you're using, but it doesn't agree with any Strong's I've checked. Nor does it agree with the #2 selling Young's Concordance. Which also agrees with Strong's.
Again you misread; I never said Rome was apostate because of how they did communion with raised bread from 800-1,200 years. It was then that they finally abolished it from the whole Latin church.
It does in that it is OFF TOPIC, and yes when I went back, that's when I discovered it was off topic because of me. And that's why I said we should end it then. And I still say it should end now with this post for the same reason. Keep your opinion and I'll keep mine.
