"Credo Unum Deo" - twinc
Do you also;
Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem: Quam nisi quisque integram inviolatamque servaverit, absque dubio in aeternam peribit. ?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
"Credo Unum Deo" - twinc
This is based on Exodus 21:12-36;
This talks about personal injuries, starts with monetary payments and ends with monetary payments.
In the middle we see an eye for an eye.
This has to be considered figurative with a monetary payment applied.
Why?
Because no where in Jewish history is there any record that the Jews ever took this literally and actually took an eye for an eye.
Famous Jewish Rabbis discuss this in the Talmud with several explanations.
Then when we look at Matthew 5:38-42;, we see Jesus telling us not to seek an eye for an eye or a tooth for a tooth.
What does Jesus then say?
He says to give, give, give, and give more than what anyone asks for.
Why is giving part of an eye for an eye passage?
Because it was always about giving to pay for damages.
Jesus is saying give, no matter what the situation.
This is based on Exodus 21:12-36;
This talks about personal injuries, starts with monetary payments and ends with monetary payments.
In the middle we see an eye for an eye.
This has to be considered figurative with a monetary payment applied.
Why?
Because no where in Jewish history is there any record that the Jews ever took this literally and actually took an eye for an eye.
Famous Jewish Rabbis discuss this in the Talmud with several explanations.
Then when we look at Matthew 5:38-42;, we see Jesus telling us not to seek an eye for an eye or a tooth for a tooth.
What does Jesus then say?
He says to give, give, give, and give more than what anyone asks for.
Why is giving part of an eye for an eye passage?
Because it was always about giving to pay for damages.
Jesus is saying give, no matter what the situation.
Could you understand the O.T. this way?:You really dont get it do you stranger. Tell me God who is He. In the OT He killed little children, murdered mothers fathers and any one else who stood in His way. In the NT Jesus came to show the father, all He did was love, even when teh soldiers came to arrest Him, He told teh disciple to put away the swords and healed the ear of teh servant. So is God love or not teh OT says other wise, some even make teh bold statement that from the OT He is evil as well, so which is He.?? Even David God would not allow Him to build His temple because he had blood on His hands, rather funny thing for God to do when it was supposedly God setting men out to kill people . So what is teh truth.
The thing that irritates you as that I cannot and will not accept teh bible is teh word of God, because His words are life and teh bible has no life, it only points you to teh one who is life. At least Gods grace answered my question, seems teh bible is no idol in her life.
actually imo a good insight to the difference is maybe found in "...and the Word WAS God."The Word was God. So the term, "Word of God" would mean "God of God".
Sorry... It wasn't meant to be taken that seriously.
oh, depends what you mean by "helping" i guess; that usually translates to "proselytizing" now, right. Likely the "...You taught in our streets" that is condemned in Scripture by association imo, or iow how much do you appreciate JWs knocking on your door, like that. See, they are helping too, rightIf you "love thy neighbour as thyself" wouldn't you think that helping your neighbor find the God of love the neighborly thing to do?
Yes, I've now changed it to "Georgia" at size 5. I wish everyone else would at least make theirs larger. I know how to increase the size to read it but there are a lot of posts, that can be more trouble than it is worth.Amen...well said....
...and, by the way the font you used in post makes it so much more easier to read. :)
oh, depends what you mean by "helping" i guess; that usually translates to "proselytizing" now, right. Likely the "...You taught in our streets" that is condemned in Scripture by association imo, or iow how much do you appreciate JWs knocking on your door, like that. See, they are helping too, right
well, you might interpret them that way, yes. Others believe that they are reading "house church" though, and still others have a completely different interpretation. Iow Jesus went to synagogue, but He also called it a den of thieves. So iow He did not go there seeking knowledgeIf we follow the examples given then we go to religious meeting places.
hmm. In the world, i guess, ya.In our time it would seem that online is the only "open" places where people can go.
another valid reflection here might be what would the Good Samaritan consider "helping," and what might he think of the priest's "religious meeting place."What would love mean by helping.
If we follow the examples given then we go to religious meeting places.
In an absolute sense even online is not so "open" as that. I am aware of physical places [not online] where anyone in attendance can get up and speak without permission from any scriptural subject. The usual limitation is that the person must be willing to be questioned if someone doubts what he has said. It sounds better than it really is because there are still flawed and fragile people in attendance. If everyone were already like Jesus or even really striving to be like him, it would be... could we say ideal?What would love mean by helping.
If we follow the examples given then we go to religious meeting places. In our time it would seem that online is the only "open" places where people can go.
well, you might interpret them that way, yes. Others believe that they are reading "house church" though, and still others have a completely different interpretation. Iow Jesus went to synagogue, but He also called it a den of thieves. So iow He did not go there seeking knowledge
Iow Jesus went to synagogue, but He also called it a den of thieves. So iow He did not go there seeking knowledge
In an absolute sense even online is not so "open" as that. I am aware of physical places [not online] where anyone in attendance can get up and speak without permission from any scriptural subject. The usual limitation is that the person must be willing to be questioned if someone doubts what he has said. It sounds better than it really is because there are still flawed and fragile people in attendance. If everyone were already like Jesus or even really striving to be like him, it would be... could we say ideal?
And how small is your God.... Do you not think God can reach teh blind and teh deaf..How do the deaf hear God's words?
Only to those who believe...The Holy spirit is not given to everyone who states they believe in him.
I am glad you can see as so many cannot,Could you understand the O.T. this way?:
God revealed Himself to the Hebrews.
From that time on, they attributed everything that happened to God.
Even what was not from God.
They're not advertised much, and they may not always be as open as they sometime want to claim, but as I have said they are much closer than most. There is no central headquarters giving orders, so there definitely differences from one assembly to the next, however, some of them are quite good. On the other hand, some are quite the other direction. I hear a lot of good words spoken and I have a visited a few in the vicinity of northern Oklahoma, but they all over the country with more grouped closer together in the Ohio\Kentucky areas. You would have to try one for yourself. Send me a PM if interested.I have not seen nor heard of places open to anyone that allows for the reading and discussion of scripture. Most churches have a specific agenda to teach only the "truths" that they deem truth by their pastors and everyone else can sit and listen and then make sure you make your deposit in the collection plate.
so you say, but in a sense now you are saying that you understand the mind of God, and anyone who interprets differently is wrong, yes?I interpret them as they were intended.
but they exist nonetheless; Mennonite church allows discussion, etc, even in sermons, after the lecture, and there are many other places where "preaching" Scripture may not necessarily be welcome, but practicing It would be, so a change of perspective there can yield fruit...i guess Christian Science rooms are also open to that? although i haven't attended a CS service yet myself; guess i should prollyI have not seen nor heard of places open to anyone that allows for the reading and discussion of scripture.